Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2010
The Political Inherency of Evaluation: The Impact of Politics on the Outcome of 10 Years of Evaluative Scrutiny of Australia's Mandatory Detention Policy
The primary objective of evaluation is to provide information that can provide a basis for developing or revising policies and programs, and is an inherently political activity. This article reflects on 10 years of scrutiny by evaluators of a contested policy in Australia—that of the mandatory detention of asylum seekers—and explores how evaluation informs political decisions, and how politics shapes the use of evaluation results.
The evidence presented shows that evaluators need to be aware of, and manage, the political forces that shape the scope and outcomes of evaluations. Otherwise, evaluation may be little more than a tool for reinforcing existing power relations rather than a neutral and objective means of improving social policies or programs. Some strategies are suggested to help evaluators safeguard their neutrality and maximise the effectiveness of their contributions to political debates.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Evaluation Association2004, AEA guiding principles for evaluators, American Evaluation Association, Fairhaven, Massachusetts.
2.
AndrewsK. (Australian Minister for Immigration and Citizenship) 2007, Howard Government's strong border policy delivers security for all, media release, Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, Canberra.
3.
Australian National Audit Office2004, Audit report no. 54, 2003-04: management of the detention centre contracts—part A, ANAO, Canberra.
4.
Australian National Audit Office2005, Audit report no.1, 2005-06: management of the detention centre contracts—part B, ANAO, Canberra.
5.
ChelimskyE.1983, ‘Improving the cost effectiveness of evaluation,’ in AlkinMC, & SolmonLC (eds), The costs of evaluation, Sage, Beverly Hills, California.
6.
Commonwealth Ombudsman2001, Report of an own motion investigation into the Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs’ immigration detention centres, Commonwealth Ombudsman, Canberra.
7.
DavidsonS.2006, What do people think about refugee policy?, Catallaxy Files, Catallaxy.com.
8.
Department of Immigration and Citizenship2008, Submission to the Joint Standing Committee on Migration Inquiry into Immigration Detention, Submission no. 129D, 30 September, Department of Immigration and Citizenship, Canberra, viewed 17 November 2008, <www.aph.gov.au/House/committee/mig/detention/subs/sub129d.pdf>.
9.
EvansC. (Minister for Immigration and Citizenship) 2008, ‘New directions in detention: restoring integrity to Australia's immigration system’, speech to the Australian National University, Canberra, 29 July, viewed 15 November 2008, <http://www.minister.immi.gov.au/media/speeches/2008/ce080729.htm>.
10.
FloodP.2001, Report of inquiry into immigration detention procedure, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.
11.
GreeneJ.C.1997, ‘Evaluation as advocacy,’American Journal of Evaluation, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 25–35.
12.
HowardJ. (Australian Prime Minister) 2005, Immigration detention, media release, 17 July, viewed 20 October 2008, Parliament House, Canberra.
Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission1997, Preliminary report on the detention of boat people, HREOC, Sydney.
15.
Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission1998, Those who've come across the seas: detention of unauthorised arrivals, HREOC, Sydney.
16.
Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission2001, A report on visits to immigration detention facilities by the Human Rights Commissioner, HREOC, Sydney.
17.
Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission2004, A last resort? National inquiry into children in immigration detention, HREOC, Sydney.
18.
Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission2006, Summary of observations following the inspection of mainland immigration detention facilities, HREOC, Sydney.
19.
Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission2007, Summary of observations following the inspection of mainland immigration detention facilities, HREOC, Sydney.
20.
JevonsC., & CarrollJ.2005, ‘Marketing, truth and political expediency,’Journal of Public Affairs, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 20–32.
21.
Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade2001, A report on visits to immigration detention centres, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.
22.
Joint Standing Committee on Migration1998, Immigration detention centres: inspection report, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.
23.
Joint Standing Committee on Migration2000, Not the Hilton—immigration detention centres: inspection report, Commmonwealth of Australia, Canberra.
MachiavelliN.1532, The Prince, trans. L Ricci, Signet Classic, New York.
27.
MillbankA.2001, The detention of boat people, Parliamentary Library Current Issues Brief 8, February, Social Policy Group, Canberra.
28.
PalmerM.2005, Inquiry into the circumstances of the Immigration Detention of Cornelia Rau: report, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.
29.
PalumboD.J.1987, ‘The political context: politics and evaluation’, in PalumboDJ (ed.), The politics of program evaluation, Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.
30.
PattonM.Q.1987, ‘Evaluation's political inherency,’ in PalumboDJ (ed.), The politics of program evaluation, Sage, Beverly Hills, California.
31.
PM responds to asylum seekers, HIH, advertising and Kyoto2001, transcript of radio program, AM, ABC Radio, Melbourne, viewed 20 October 2008, <http://www.abc.net.au/am/stories/s314922.htm>.
TaylorD., & BallochS.2005, ‘Introduction: the politics of evaluation—an overview’, in TaylorD, & BallochS, The politics of evaluation: participation and policy implementation, The Policy Press, Bristol, UK.
34.
VanstoneA. (Australian Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs) 2004, HREOC Inquiry into Children in Immigration report tabled, media release 68/2004, Department of Immigration, Canberra, 13 May, viewed 12 October 2008, <http://pandora.nla.gov.au>.
35.
VanstoneA. (Australian Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs) 2005, Report of Palmer Inquiry into Cornelia Rau Matter, media release, Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, Canberra, 14 July, viewed 12 October 2008, <http://pandora.nla.gov.au>.
36.
VanstoneA. (Australian Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs) 2006, Vanstone builds on commitment to alternative detention arrangements, media release, Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, Canberra, 2 February, viewed 12 October 2008, <http://pandora.nla.gov.au>.
37.
WeissC.H.1987, ‘Where politics and evaluation research meet’, in PalumboDJ (ed.), The politics of program evaluation, Sage, Newbury Park, California.
