BrinkerhoffR.1981, ‘Making evaluation more useful’, Training and Development Journal, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 66–70.
2.
FerringtonJ., & ClarkR.E.2000, ‘Snake oil, science, and performance products,’Performance Improvement, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 5–10.
3.
Guerra-LópezI.2007, Evaluating impact: evaluation and continual improvement for performance improvement practitioners, Human Resource Development Press, Champaign, Illinois, USA.
4.
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation1994, The program evaluation standards, Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.
5.
KaufmanR.A., GuerraI., & PlattW.A.2006, Practical evaluations for educators: finding what works and what doesn't, Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, California.
6.
KirkpatrickD.L.1959, ‘Techniques for evaluating training programs’, Journal of ASTD, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 21–26.
7.
LynchD., GreerA., LarsonL., CummingsD., HarriettB., Springer DreyfusK., & ClayM.2003, ‘Descriptive metaevaluation: case study of an interdisciplinary curriculum, Evaluation and the Health Professions, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 447–461.
8.
NevoD.1981, ‘The evaluation of a multi-dimensional project’, in LewyA, & KugelmassS (Eds), Decision oriented evaluation in education: the case of Israel, International Science Services, Philadelphia.
9.
PattonM.Q.1997, Utilization-focused evaluation: the new century text, 3rd edn, Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.
10.
PershingJ.2006, Handbook of human performance technology: principles, practices, potential, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
11.
PhillipsJ.1997, Return on investment in training and performance improvement programs, Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington, Massachusetts.
12.
ProvusM.1971, The discrepancy model: for educational program improvement and assessment, McCutchan, Berkeley, California.
13.
ScrivenM.1967, ‘The methodology of evaluation’, in TylerR, GagneR, & ScrivenM (Eds), Perspectives on curriculum evaluation, McGraw-Hill, New York.
14.
ScrivenM.1974, ‘Standards for the evaluation of educational programs and products’, in BorrichG.D. (ed.), Evaluating educational programs and products, Educational Technology, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
15.
StuffelbeamD., 1967, The evaluation of context, input, process, and product in elementary and secondary education, paper commissioned by and presented to the US Office of Education.
16.
StakeR.E.1975, Program evaluation, particularly responsive evaluation, Evaluation Center, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan.
17.
StuffelbeamD., & ShinkfieldA.2007, Evaluation theory, models and applications, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
18.
TylerR.1949, Basic principles of curriculum and instruction, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.