This article examines the use of the Delphi technique as part of a Needs Assessment to inform an evaluation capability-building plan within a government department. Besides considering the Delphi process itself, it also raises methodological issues and suggests steps that might be taken in the future.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AltschuldJ.W., & WitkinB.R.2000, From needs assessment to action: transforming needs into solution strategies, Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.
2.
CritcherC., & GladstoneB.1998, ‘Utilising the Delphi technique in policy discussion: a case study of a privatised utility in Britain’, Public Administration, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 431–449.
3.
Department of Primary Industries (DPI)2008, ‘Agriculture and Fisheries Group Evaluation and Reporting Framework: exposure draft’, Office of Science, Technology and Commercialisation, DPI, Victoria, unpublished.
4.
GaberJ.2000, ‘Meta-needs assessment’, Evaluation and Program Planning, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 139–147.
5.
GaravaliaL., & GredlerM.2004, ‘Teaching evaluation through modeling: using the Delphi technique to assess problems in academic programs’, American Journal of Evaluation, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 375–380.
6.
JonesJ., & HunterD.1996, ‘Consensus methods for medical and health services research’, in MaysN, & PopeC (Eds), Qualitative Research in Health CareBMJ, London.
7.
KingJ.2007, ‘Developing evaluation capacity through process use’, in CousinsJ.B. (ed.), Process use in theory, research, and practice: New directions for evaluation, 116, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
8.
LeeY., AltschuldJ.W., & WhiteJ.L.2007, ‘Problems in needs assessment data: discrepancy analysis’, Evaluation and Program Planning, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 258–266.
9.
MackayK.2002, ‘The World Bank's ECB experience’, in ComptonD, BaizermanM, & StockdillS Hueftle (Eds), The art, craft, and science of evaluation capacity building: New directions for evaluation, 93, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
10.
OwenJ.M.2006, Program evaluation: forms and approaches, 3rd edn, Allen & Unwin, Crow's Nest, New South Wales.
11.
ReviereR., BerkowitzS., CarterC.C., & FergusonC.G. (Eds) 1996, Needs assessment: a creative and practical guide for social scientists, Taylor & Francis, Washington, DC.
12.
Rodski Survey Research2005, ‘Department of Primary Industries: employee opinion survey report’, Department of Primary Industries, Victoria, unpublished.
13.
RothJ.1990, ‘Needs and the needs assessment process’, Evaluation Practice, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 141–143.
StockdillS., BaizermanM., & ComptonD.2002, ‘Toward a definition of the ECB process: a conversation with the ECB literature’, in ComptonD, BaizermanM, & StockdillS Hueftle (Eds), The art, craft, and science of evaluation capacity building: New directions for evaluation, 93, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
VolkovB., & KingJ.2007, A checklist for building organizational evaluation capacity: Evaluation Checklists Project, viewed 13 August 2008, <www.wmich.edu/evalctr/checklists>.
19.
WatermanS.1990, ‘Comment on needs assessment article in EN #2’, Evaluation Practice, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 140–141.
20.
WitkinB.R., & AltschuldJ.W.1995, Planning and conducting needs assessments: a practical guide, Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.
