The spread of results-based management in developed countries, combined with increasing taxpayers’ concern for non-performing projects, has increased the relevance of evaluation in development assistance. There are challenges, however, stemming from the ‘more than usual’ complexities of evaluation circumstances (e.g. asymmetry of interest in evaluation between an aid donor and a recipient) as well as the changing development context, such as increasingly strategic orientation of donor policies, growing weight of global development targets such as the Millennium Development Goals, and spread of the practice of multi-donor assistance. The paper reviews the theoretical and practical issues involved in coping with these challenges. It argues that the increasing emphasis placed on capacity development in development policy and programs, when coupled with empowerment approaches in evaluation, may give rise to a new and promising role for evaluation in development and development cooperation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BambergerM.2000, ‘The evaluation of international development programs: a view from the front’, American Journal of Evaluation, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 95–102.
2.
BrinkerhoffD., & GoldsmithA.A.1992, ‘Promoting the sustainability of development institutions: a framework for strategy, World Development, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 369–383.
3.
Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA)2002, ‘Assessing sustainability’, What we're learning no. 2, Canadian International Development Agency, Ottawa.
4.
ChapmanD., & NagaoM.2006, ‘Editorial: the evaluation of international cooperation in education—assuring quality and effectiveness during rapid change’, Journal of International Cooperation in Education, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–5.
5.
DabelsteinN., & RebienC.C.2002, ‘Evaluation of development assistance: its start, progress, and current challenges’, in FuruboJ-E, RistR.C., & SandahlR (eds), International atlas of evaluation, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, New Jersey, pp. 393–405.
6.
EllermanD.2004, ‘Autonomy in education and development’, Journal of International Cooperation in Education, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 3–14.
7.
FettermanD.2000, ‘Steps of empowerment evaluation: from California to Cape Town’, in StufflebeamD.L. (eds), Evaluation models: viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation, 2nd edn, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp. 395–408.
8.
FuruboJ-E, RistR.C., & SandahlR. (eds) 2002, International atlas of evaluation, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
9.
GarawayGila2003, ‘Evaluating educational programs and projects in the Third World’, in KellaghanT, & StufflebeamD.L. (eds), International handbook of educational evaluation, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 701–720.
10.
GuerreroR.P.1999, ‘Evaluation capacity development in developing countries: applying the lessons from experience’, in BoyleR, & LemaireD (eds), Building effective evaluation capacity, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, New Jersey, pp. 177–194.
11.
KingK.1998, ‘New challenges to international development cooperation in education’, Journal of International Cooperation in Education, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3–16.
12.
KingK.2004, ‘The external agenda of educational reform: a challenge to educational self-reliance and dependency in Sub-Saharan Africa’, Journal of International Cooperation in Education, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 85–96.
13.
LindahlC., & CattersonJ.2005, ‘What causes aid dependncy? Evaluating thirty years of Swedish bilateral aid to Tanzani’, in PitmanG.K., FeinsteinO.N., & IngramG.K. (eds), Evaluating development effectiveness, World Bank series on evaluation and development, vol. 7, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, New Jersey, pp. 133–151.
14.
MackayK.2002, ‘The World Bank's evaluation capacity building experience’, in ComptonD.W., BaizermanM, & StockdillS Hueftle (eds), The art, craft, and science of evaluation capacity building, New directions for evaluation, no. 93, Spring, pp. 81–100.
15.
MinamotoY., & NagaoM.2006, ‘Process considerations in evaluating educational cooperation projects’, Journal of International Cooperation in Education, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 89–106.
16.
Mpumalanga Department of Education1999, Mpumalanga secondary science initiative (MSSI), Project Document, Middelburg, South Africa.
17.
Mpumalanga Secondary Science Initiative (MSSI)2006, Joint Evaluation of the Mpumalanga Secondary Science Initiative (MSSI), Nelspruit, South Africa.
18.
NagaoM.2001, ‘Purposes and uses of evaluation in aid projects: an Illustration by Japanese aid to mathematics and science education in South Africa’, Journal of International Cooperation in Education, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 89–100.
19.
NagaoM.2004, ‘Could Japan be a good math and science teacher for Africa’, Journal of International Cooperation in Education, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 53–70.
20.
OECD/DAC1997, Development Cooperation 1996 Report, OECD, Paris.
21.
OECD/DAC1999, Guidance for evaluating humanitarian assistance in complex emergencies, Working Party on Aid Evaluation, OECD, Paris.
22.
OECD/DAC2000, Results based management in the development co-operation agencies: a review of experience—executive summary, Working Party on Aid Evaluation, OECD, Paris.
23.
OECD/DAC2006, The challenge of capacity development: working towards good practice, DAC Network on Governance, OECD, Paris.
24.
OwenJ.2006, Program evaluation: forms and approaches, Allen & Unwin, Crows Nest, NSW.
25.
PattonM.Q.1982, Practical evaluation, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California.
26.
PattonM.Q.1997, Utilization-focused evaluation: the new century text, 3rd edn, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California.
27.
PicciottoR.2003, ‘International trend and development evaluation: the need for ideas’, American Journal of Evaluation, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 227–234.
28.
RawlingsL.2005, ‘Operational reflections on evaluating development programs’, in PitmanG.K., FeinsteinO.N., & IngramG.K. (eds), Evaluating development effectiveness, World Bank series on evaluation and development, vol. 7, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, New Jersey, pp. 193–204.
29.
StewartF.2005, ‘Evaluating evaluation in a world of multiple goals, interests, and models’, in PitmanG.K., FeinsteinO.N., & IngramG.K. (eds), Evaluating development effectiveness, World Bank series on evaluation and development, vol. 7, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, New Jersey, pp. 3–29.
30.
SvenssonK.1997, ‘The analysis and evaluation of foreign aid’, in ChelimskyE, & ShadishW.R. (eds), Evaluation for the 21st century: a handbook, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California.
31.
WhiteH.2005, ‘Challenges in evaluating development effectiveness’, in PitmanG.K., FeinsteinO.N., & IngramG.K. (eds), Evaluating development effectiveness, World Bank series on evaluation and development, vol. 7, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, New Jersey, pp. 33–54.
32.
WiesnerE.1997, ‘Evaluation, markets, and institutions in the reform agenda of developing countries’, in ChelimskyE, & ShadishiW (eds), Evaluation for the 21st century: a handbook, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California, pp. 189–200.
