This article reviews the use of photographs as data within the social sciences as well as defining related terminology used over the past century. It then examines the use of photos as stimuli for talking about health settings before presenting three recent case studies where photo-interviewing has been used successfully in health evaluation and research. Advantages and limitations of the method are considered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AkeretR.U.1973, Photoanalysis: how to interpret the hidden psychological meaning of personal and public photographs, Wyden, New York.
2.
ArnettJ.J.1995, ‘Adolescents use of media for self-socialization’, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 519–33.
3.
AschermannE.1998, ‘Photographs as retrieval cues for children’, Applied Cognitive Psychology, vol. 12, pp. 55–66.
4.
BanksM.2001, Visual methods in social research.Sage Publications, London.
5.
BeckerH.1975, ‘Photography and sociology’, Afterimage, vol. 3, pp. 22–32.
6.
BeckerH.1978, ‘Do photographs tell the truth?’, Afterimage, vol. 5, pp. 9–13.
7.
BenderD.E.2001, ‘Tell me what you mean by “Si”: perceptions of quality of prenatal care among immigrant Latina women’, Qualitative Health Research, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 780–794.
8.
BennettT.1995, ‘Do you remember when …’, Australian Association of Rural Nurses Newsletter, February, vol. 2.
9.
BensonS., 1997, ‘The body health and eating disorders’, in WoodwardK (ed.), Identity and Difference, Sage Publications, London.
10.
BrownR.D., PetersonC.H., & SansteadM.1980, ‘Photographic evaluation: the use of the camera as an evaluation tool for student affairs’, Journal of College Student Personnel, pp. 558–63.
11.
BuchananD.1998, ‘Representing process: the contribution of a re-engineering frame’, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, vol. 18, no. 11-12, p. 1163.
12.
CaldarolaV.J.1988, ‘Imaging process as ethnographic inquiry’, Visual Anthropology, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 433–51.
13.
ChiozziP.1989, ‘Photography and anthropological research: three case studies’, in BoonzajerF (ed.), Eyes across the water (pp 43–50), Het Spinhuis, Amsterdam.
14.
CollierJ.1979, ‘Visual anthropology’, in WagnerJ (ed.), Images of information, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, California.
15.
CollierJ.1987, ‘Visual anthropology's contribution to the field of anthropology’, Visual Anthropology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 37–46.
16.
CollierJ., & CollierM.1986, Visual anthropology, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.
17.
CunninghamC.C., GlennS., & FitzpatrickH.2000, ‘Parents telling their offspring about Down syndrome and disability’, Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, vol. 13, pp. 47–61.
18.
CurryT.J., & StraussR.H.1994, ‘A little pain never hurt anybody: a photo-essay on the normalization of sport injuries’, Sociology of Sport Journal, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 195–208.
19.
DempseyJ.V., & TuckerS.A.1994, ‘Using photo-interviewing as a tool for research and evaluation’, Educational Technology, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 55–62.
20.
DiamondK.E.1996, ‘Preschool children's conceptions of disabilities: the salience of disability in children's ideas about others’, Topics in Early Childhood Special Education (TECSE), vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 458–75.
21.
DouglasK.B.1998, ‘Impressions: African American first-year students' perceptions of a predominantly white university’, Journal of Negro Education, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 416–31.
22.
DuncanM.C.1990, ‘Sports photographs and sexual difference: images of women and men in the 1984 and 1988 Olympic Games’, Sociology of Sport Journal, vol. 7, pp. 22–43.
23.
EmmisonM., & SmithP.2001, Researching the visual, Sage Publications, London.
24.
EntinA.D.1979, ‘Reflection of families’, Photo Therapy Quarterly, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 19–21.
25.
FingersonL.1999, ‘Active viewing: girls' interpretations of family television programs’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 389–418.
26.
FosterS., HogeJ.D., & RoschR.H.1999, ‘Thinking aloud about history: children's and adolescents' responses to historical photographs’, Theory and Research in Social Education, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 179–214.
27.
GatesM.1976, ‘Measuring peasant attitudes to modernisation: a projective method’, Current Anthropology, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 641–65.
28.
GeraceL.M.1989, ‘Using family photographs to explore life cycle changes’, Nursing and Health Care, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 244–49.
29.
GluckS.B., & PataiD.1991, ‘Introduction’, in GluckS.B., & PataiD (eds), Women's words. the feminist practice of oral history (pp. 1–9), Routledge, New York.
30.
GoldS.1986, ‘Ethnic boundaries and ethnic entrepreneurship: a photo-elicitation study’, Visual Sociology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 9–22.
31.
GranasteinL.1998, ‘Pump it up’, Mediaweek, vol. 8, no. 35, pp. 24–6.
32.
HagedornM.I.E.1994, ‘Hermeneutic photography: an innovative aesthetic technique for generating data in nursing research’, Advances in Nursing Science, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 44–50.
33.
HagedornM.I.E.1996, ‘Photography: an aesthetic technique for nursing inquiry’, Issues in Mental Health Nursing, vol. 17, pp. 517–27.
34.
HarevenT., & LangenbachR.1978, Amoskeag: life and work in an American factory city, Pantheon Press, New York.
35.
HarperD.1984, ‘Meaning and work: a study in photo elicitation’, International Journal of Visual Sociology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 20–43.
36.
HarperD., ‘Visual sociology: expanding sociological vision’, The American Sociologist, Spring, pp. 54–70.
37.
HarringtonC., & LindyI.1998, ‘The use of reflexive photography in the study of the freshman year experiencee’, paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Indiana Association for Institutional Research (ED 429473).
38.
HeisleyD.D., & LevyS.J.1991, ‘Autodriving: a photoelicitation technique’, Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 18, pp. 257–72.
39.
HigginsS., & HighleyB.1986, ‘The camera as a study tool: photo interview of mothers and infants with congestve heart failure’, Children's Health Care, vol. 15, pp. 119–22.
40.
HurworthR.1995, ‘An annotated bibliography concerning the use of the visual medium for research and evaluation’, Evaluation News & Comment, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 53–60.
41.
HurworthR.2003, ‘Photo-interviewing’, Social Research Update, no. 40, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
42.
HurworthR., & SweeneyM.1995, ‘The use of the visual image in a variety of australian evaluations’, Evaluation Practice, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 153–64.
43.
KillionC.M.2001, ‘Understanding cutural aspects of health through photography’, Nursing Outlook, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 50–4.
44.
KillionC.M., & WangC.C.2000, ‘Linking African American mothers across life stage and station through photovoice’, Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 310–25.
45.
LincolnY.S., & GubaE.G.1985, Naturalistic inquiry, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, California.
46.
MagilvyJ.K., CongdonJ.G., NelsonJ.P., & CraigC.1992, ‘Visions of rural aging: use of photographic method in gerontological research’, The Gerontologist, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 253–57.
47.
MartinC., & GentryJ.1997, ‘Stuck in the model trap: the effects of beautiful models in ads on female pre-adolescents and adolescents’, Journal of Advertising, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 19–33.
48.
MilesM.B., & HubermanA.M.1994, Qualitative date analysis: an expanded sourcebook, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California.
49.
ModellJ.A., & BrodskyC.1994, ‘Envisioning homestead: using photographs in interviewing’, Interactive oral history interviewing, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
RubyJ.1976, ‘In a pic's eye: interpretative strategies for deriving significance and meaning from photographs’, Afterimage, vol. 3, pp. 5–7.
53.
RubyJ.1991, ‘Speaking for, speaking about, speaking with or speaking alongside: an anthropological and documentary dilemma’, Visual Anthropology Review, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 50–67.
54.
SalmonK.2001, ‘Remembering and reporting by children: the influence of cues and props’, Clinical Psychology Review, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 267–300.
55.
SangsterJ.1994, ’Telling our stories: feminist debates and the use of oral history, Women's History Review, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 5–28.
56.
SmithC.Z., & WoodwardJ.1999, ‘A photoelicitation method gives voice and reactions of subjects’, Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 31–41.
57.
StokrockiM.1984, ‘The significance of touching in an art awareness experience: a photographic analysis, elicitation and interpretation’, International Journal of Visual Sociology, vol. 2, pp. 44–58.
58.
SucharC.S., & RotenbergR.1994, ‘Judging the adequacy of shelter: a case from Lincoln Park’, Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 149–65.
59.
SchwartzD.1989, ‘Visual ethnography: using photography in qualitative research’, Qualitative Sociology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 119–54.
60.
SticeE.1994, ‘Review of the evidence for a sociocultural model of bulimia nervosa and an exploration of the mechanism of action’, Clinical Psychology Review, vol. 14, pp. 633–41.
61.
TemplinP.1978, Still photography: can it provide program portrayal?, Centre for Instructional Research and Curriculum Evaluation, University of Illinois, Urbana.
62.
TemplinP.A.1982, ‘Still photography in evaluation’, in SmithN.L. (ed.), Communication strategies in evaluation: new perspectives in evaluation, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, California.
63.
TuckerS.A., & DempseyJ.V.1991, ‘Photo-interviewing: a tool for evaluating technological innovations’, Evaluation Review, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 639–54.
64.
van der DoesP.1992, ‘Reading images: a study of a Dutch neighbourhood’, Visual Sociology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 4–67.
65.
van LeeuwenT.2000, The handbook of visual analysis, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California.
66.
WachtmanE.L.1978, ‘The camera as an evaluation and research instrument: snapshots of the a science curriculum’, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Toronto, Canada (ED 161925).
67.
WagnerJ. (ed.) 1979, Images of information, Sage Publications, Beverley Hills, California.
68.
WalkerR.1993, ‘Finding a silent voice for the researcher: using photographs in evaluation and research’, in SchratzM (ed.), Qualitative voices in educational research, Falmer Press, London.
69.
WangC.C.1998, ‘Practice notes: strategies in health education—photovoice involving homeless men and women of Washtenaw County, Michigan’, Health Education and Behaviour, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 8–10.
70.
WangC.C.1999, ‘Photovoice: a participatory action research strategy applied to women's health’, Journal of Women's Health, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 185–92.
71.
WangC., & BurrisM.A.1994, ‘Empowerment through photo novella: portraits of participation’, Health Education Quarterly, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 171–86.
72.
WangC., & BurrisM.A.1997, ‘Photovoice; concept, methodology and use for participatory needs assessment’, Health and Behaviour, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 369–87.
73.
WangC., BurrisM.A., & XiangY.P.1996, ‘Chinese women as visual anthropologists: a participatory approach to reaching policy makers’, Social Science and Medicine, vol. 42, no. 10, 1391–400.
74.
WangC.C., WuK.Z.1998, ‘Photovoice as a participatory health promotion strategy’, Health Promotion International, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 75–86.
75.
WeinigerS.1998, ‘Children living in poverty: their perception of career opportunities’, Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, May–June, pp. 320–30.
76.
WesselsD.T.Jr1985, ‘Using family photographs in the treatment of eating disorders’, Psychotherapy in Private Practice, vol. 3, pp. 95–105.
77.
ZillerR.C.1990, Photographing the self: methods for observing personal orientations, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California.
