Older people with multiple chronic conditions and complex health care needs require a comprehensive, accessible and well-coordinated system of services. To address this growing problem, a consortium of acute and community-based health care organisations implemented a ‘Patients First’ model of service integration for the target population. The project evaluation utilised a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods in an action research framework.
Findings
The evaluation process not only demonstrated the benefits of the project to patients and the health care system, but also contributed to the identification of pivotal components in the model, aspects requiring attention and consequently their refinement. It was also a vehicle for the development of a sense of ownership amongst staff and has evolved into an integral part of the model.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndrewsG.2002, ‘A brief integer scorer for the SF-12: validity of the brief scorer in Australian community and clinic settings’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 508–14.
2.
BussingA., & HerbigB.2003, ‘Tacit knowledge and experience in working’, Psychology Science, vol. 45(Supplement III), pp. 142–64.
3.
CumminsR.A.1993, Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale for adults, fourth edition (ComQol-A4) manual, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.
4.
CumminsR.A.2000, Objective and Subjective Quality of Life: an interactive model, Social Indicators Research, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 55–72.
5.
CumminsR.A., McCabeM.P., RomeoY., & GulloneE.1994, ‘The Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale (ComQol): instrument development and psychometric evaluation on college staff and students’, Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 372–82.
6.
DHS2002, Western Metropolitan Region Health and Social Wellbeing Profile, 2nd edn, Department of Human Services, Melbourne.
7.
DHS2003, Hospital admission risk program (HARP): integrated care for clients with complex needs working party report, Hospital Demand Management, Metropolitan Health and Aged Care Services Division, Victorian Government Department of Human Services, Melbourne.
8.
HeaneyC., Lydall-SmithS., O'ConnorC., & TenniC.2003, The utility of the Resident Assessment Instrument for Home Care (RAI-HC), Victorian Coordinated Healthcare Trial, Bundoora, Australia.
9.
HerbigB., & BussingA.2003, ‘Comparison of the role of explicit and implicit knowledge in working’, Psychology Science, vol. 45(Supplement III), 165–88.
10.
interRAI-UK2002, Outcome measurement with minimum data set assessments, Centre for Health Service Studies, George Allen Wing, University of Kent, interRAI UK, Canterbury, UK.
11.
JenkinsonC., ChandolaT., CoulterA., & BrusterS.2001, ‘An assessment of the construct validity of the SF-12 summary scores across ethnic groups’, Journal of Public Health Medicine, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 187–94.
12.
MateoM.A., MatzkeK., & NewtonC.1998, ‘Designing measurements to access case management outcomes’, Nursing Case Management, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 2–6.
13.
MorrisJ.N., FriesB.E., BernabeiR., SteelK., IkegamiN., & CarpenterI.2003, interRAI-HOME CARE (interRAI-HC) item by item assessment manual: primer on use of the HC Assessment Form and the Client Assessment Protocols (CAPs), interRAI Corporation, Washington, DC.
14.
RobertsD.Y.2002, ‘Reconceptualizing case management in theory and practice: a frontline perspective’, Health Services Management Research, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 147–64.
15.
SandersonK., & AndrewsG.2002, ‘The SF-12 in the Australian population: cross-validation of item selection’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 343–46.
16.
SmithL.C., AmsingN., PilbrowD.S., BirdS.R., SinnottH.M., TeichtahlH.2003, ‘Providing better care for patients with chronic disease’, Australian Journal of Primary Care, vol. 9, nos 2 & 3, pp. 119–26.
17.
SullivanM.T.2002, ‘Caregiver Strain Index (CSI)’, Journal of Gerontological Nursing, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 4–5.
18.
SullivanM.T.2003, ‘Caregiver Strain Index (CSI)’, Healthcare Nurse, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 197–8.
19.
TaylorA.W., WilsonD.H., GrandeE.D., & Ben-TovimD.2000, ‘Mental health status of the South Australian population’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 29–34.
20.
ThorntonM., & TravisS.S.2003, ‘Analysis of the reliability of the modified caregiver strain index’, The Journal of Gerontology, vol. 58B, no. 2, pp. S127–S132.
21.
TodA.M., ReadC., LaceyA., & AbbottJ.2001, ‘Barriers to uptake of services for coronary heart disease: qualitative study’, British Medical Journal, vol. 323, no. 7306, pp. 214–17.
22.
van der HeijdenB.I.J.M.2000, ‘The development and psychometric evaluation of a multidimensional measurement instrument of professional expertise’, High Ability Studies, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 9–39.
23.
WareJ.E., KosinskiM., Turner-BowlerD.M., & GandekB.2002, ‘How to score Version 2 of the SF-12 Health Survey’, QualityMetric Incorporated & Health Assessment Lab, Lincoln, Rhode Island.
24.
WolffJ.L., StarfieldB., & AndersonG.2002, ‘Prevalence, expenditures, and complications of multiple chronic conditions in the elderly’, Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 162, no. 20, pp. 2269–76.
