MacDonaldB.1976, ‘Evaluation and the control of evaluation’, in TawneyD.A. (ed.), Curriculum evaluation today: trends and implications, Schools Council Research Studies, Macmillan, London.
ParlettM., & HamiltonD.1972, ‘Evaluation as illumination: a new approach to the study of innovatory programmes’, Occasional Paper No. 9, Centre for Research in the Educational Sciences, University of Edinburgh, reprinted in GV Glass (ed.) 1976, Evaluation Studies Review Annual, vol. 1, Sage, Beverly Hills, California. pp. 140–157.
StakeR.E.1967, ‘The countenance of educational’, inTeachers College Record, vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 523–540.
9.
StakeR.E. (ed.) 1975, Evaluating the arts in education: a responsive approach, Charles E Merrill, Columbus, Ohio.
10.
StenhouseL. (ed.) 1980, Curriculum research and development, Heinemann, London.
11.
WalkerR.1980, ‘Making sense and losing meaning’, in SimonsH. (ed.), Towards a science of the Singular, CARE Occasional Publications No. 10, University of East Anglia, Norwich. pp. 222–235.
12.
WeissC.1983, ‘The stakeholder approach to evaluation: origins and promise’, in BrykA.S. (ed.), New directions for program evaluation, no. 17, Jossey Bass, London.
13.
WeissC., & ReinM.1969, ‘The evaluation of broad-aims programs: a cautionary case and a moral’, inAnnals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 385, pp. 133–142.