BambergerM. (ed.) 2000, Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Research in Development Projects, Directions in Development Series, World Bank, Washington, DC.
2.
BoruchR.1997, Randomized Experiments for Planning and Evaluation: A Practical Guide, Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.
3.
BrockT.2001, Viewing mixed methods through an implementation lens: A response to the New Hope and Moving to Opportunities evaluations, paper presented at the MacArthur Conference on Mixed Methods, January 2001.
4.
CookT. D.1985: ‘Postpositivist critical multiplism’, in Social Science and Social Policy, eds I. & MarkM. M., Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, pp. 21–62.
5.
DattaL-e2001, Avoiding death by evaluation: The Abt evaluation of the Comer Approach, paper presented at the MacArthur Conference on Mixed Methods, January
6.
GibsonC. M., & DuncanG. J.2001, Qualitative/quantitative synergies in a random-assignment program evaluation, paper presented at the MacArthur Conference on Mixed Methods, January 2001.
7.
GoldenbergC., GallimoreR., & ReeseL.2001, Using Mixed Methods to Explore Latino Children's Literacy Development, paper presented at the MacArthur Conference on Mixed Methods, January 2001.
8.
GreeneJ. C., & CaracelliV. J. (eds) 1997, Advances in Mixed-method Evaluation: The Challenges and Benefits of Integrating Diverse Paradigms, New Directions for Evaluation, no. 74, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
9.
HenryG. T., JulnesG., & MarkM. M. (eds) 1998, Realistic Evaluation: An Emerging Theory in Support of Practice, New Directions for Evaluation, no. 79, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
10.
JulnesG., & FosterE. M.2001, Crafting evaluation in support of welfare reform, unpublished paper.
11.
KidderL. H., & FineM.1987, ‘Qualitative and quantitative methods: When stories converge’, in Multiple Methods in Program Evaluation, eds MarkM. M., & ShotlandR. L., New Directions for Program Evaluation, no. 35, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 57–75.
12.
LiS., MarquartJ. M., & ZercherC.2000, ‘Conceptual issues and analytic strategies in mixed-method studies of preschool inclusions’, Journal of Early Intervention, no. 20, pp. 116–132.
13.
LipseyM. W., & CordrayD. S.2000, ‘Evaluation methods for social intervention’, Annual Review of Psychology, no. 51, pp. 345–375.
14.
MarkM. M., HenryG. T., & JulnesG.1999, Evaluation: An Integrated Framework for Understanding, Guiding and Improving Policies and Programs, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
15.
MillsapM. A.2000, Evaluation of Detroit's Comer Schools and Families Initiative, Abt Associates, Cambridge, Massachusetts.