This paper analyses the International Labour Organisation's recent review of its Maternity Protection Convention (No. 103) and Recommendation (No. 95) from a feminist perspective, arguing the need for more comprehensive provisions in a revised convention. It also evaluates the provision of maternity rights in Australia, the Australian government's position in relation to the ILO convention, and the capacity for international standards to extend maternity rights in this country. It argues that federal law reform is necessary to strengthen women's maternity rights at work, and notes the importance of ratification of ILO 103 to such an agenda. However, the author is somewhat pessimistic about the immediate prospects both for the extension of standards in ILO provisions, and for substantial progress on maternity rights in Australia.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ABS, The Labour Force, Australia, Catalogue no. 6203.0 (various years)
2.
ABS, The Labour Force Status Survey, Catalogue no. 6224.0 (June 1997)
3.
ABS, Weekly Earnings of Employees, Catalogue no. 6310.0 (August 1997)
4.
ABS, Labour Mobility, Catalogue no 6209.0 (110), (February 1994)
5.
ACIRRT (1998), Agreements Database and Monitor, Report No. 16, Australian Centre for Industrial Relations Research and Training, Sydney.
6.
BakerM. (1997), ‘Parental Benefit Policies and the Gendered Division of Labour’, Social Science Review, 11(1), March, pp. 51–71.
7.
BakerM. (1995), Canadian Family Policies: Cross National Comparisons, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
8.
BittmanM.PixleyJ. (1997), The Double Life of the Family, Allen and Unwin, Sydney.
9.
BrennanD. (1998), The Politics of Australian Childcare, 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, Melbourne.
10.
de la CruzH.G.B.von PotobskyG.SwepstonL. (1996), The International Labor Organization: the International Standards System and Basic Rights, Westview Press, Boulder (Colorado) and Oxford.
11.
GlezerH. (1988), Maternity Leave in Australia, Employee and Employer Experiences, Australian Institute of Family Studies Monograph No. 7, Melbourne.
12.
HREOC (1999), Pregnant and Productive: It' a right not a privilege to work while pregnant, Report of the National Pregnancy and Work Inquiry, Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission,Sydney.
13.
HunterR. (1996), ‘Part-time work and indirect discrimination’, Alternative Law Journal, 21 (5), pp. 220–222.
14.
ILC (1999), Report of the Committee on Maternity Protection, International Labour Conference 87th Session, Geneva.
15.
ILO (1999), Maternity Protection at Work, Report V(2), International Labour Office, Geneva.
16.
ILO (16/2/1998), Press Release, International Labour Office, Geneva.
17.
ILO (1997), Maternity Protection at Work, Report V(1), International Labour Office, Geneva.
18.
JonesE.G.MathenyR.J. (1993), ‘Relationship between infant feeding and exclusion rate from childcare because of illness’, Journal of the American Diet Association, 93 (7), pp. 809–811.
19.
MacDermottT. (1997), ‘Linking Gender and Superannuation’, International Journal of Discrimination and the Law, 1997, 2, pp. 271–297.
20.
MacDermottT. (1996), ‘Who' rocking the cradle’, Alternative Law Journal, 21 (5), pp. 207–212.
21.
McDonaldP. (1998), ‘Contemporary fertility patterns in Australia’, People and Place, 6 (1), pp. 1–13.
22.
MoreheadA.SteeleM.AlexanderM.StephenK.DuffinL. (1997), Changes at Work: the 1995 Australian Workplace Industrial Relations SurveyAddison Wesley Longman, South Melbourne.
23.
National Association of Community Based Children' Services (1997) Cost versus Quality, NACBS, Canberra.
24.
NHRMC (1984), Guidelines to Promote Breastfeeding and Implement WHO International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes, National Health and Medical Research Council, Canberra.
25.
NWCC (1993), Paid Maternity Leave, A Discussion Paper on Paid Maternity Leave in Australia, National Women' Consultative Council, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.
26.
NWJC (1999), Submission to the International Labour Conference 87th SessionNational Women' Justice Coalition, Canberra.
27.
OECD (1988), Employment Outlook, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.
28.
PalmerC. (1998), Legal rights to child friendly working hours, Legal Action Group London.
29.
RuskinN.SmithL. (1988), ‘The Role and Impact of International Labour Organisation Standards in the Australian Workplace’, Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol 40 (2), pp. 314–325.
30.
TaskerG.SiemonD. (1998), Is Child Care Affordable? Pressures on Families and their use of Formal Long Day Care, Brotherhood of St Laurence and Community Child Care, Melbourne.
31.
UNICEF (1990), Innocenti Declaration on the Protection, Promotion and Support of Breastfeeding, United Nations Children' Fund, New York.
32.
WhitehouseG. and ZetlinD. (1999), ‘Globalization and the Pursuit of Pay Equity: Contradictory Pressures in the Australian Case’, in EdwardsP. and EigerT. (Eds) The Global Economy, National States and the Regulation of LabourMansell'London & New York.
33.
Work and Family Unit (1999), Work and Family State of Play, Department of Employment, Workplace Relations and Small Business, Canberra.
