Based on the material obtained from focus group interviews conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, the article analyses the mechanisms used by employers towards employees, as well as the adaptation strategies applied by those in precarious employment in Poland. The authors’ considerations refer to anti-worker changes introduced under the pretext of the pandemic in the capitalist labour market: layoffs and cuts in wages, manifestations of discrimination against precarious workers and the potential attitudes of employee self-defence. The authors conclude that it is almost certain that under the conditions of post-pandemic capitalism, the number of the precariat will grow and the neoliberal system will want to retain as many of the anti-worker solutions introduced in the shadow of the pandemic as possible.
AzharSKhanD (2020) Rethinking informal labor in peripheral capitalism: the dynamics of surplus, market, and spatiality. Labor History61(3–4): 320–334.
2.
BielerASalygaJ (2020) Baltic labour in the crucible of capitalist exploitation: reassessing ‘post-communist’ transformation. The Economic and Labour Relations Review31(2): 191–210.
3.
BohleDGreskovitsB (2009) East-central Europe’s quandary. Journal of Democracy20(4): 50–63.
4.
BonefeldW (1995) The politics of debt. Common Sense17: 69–91.
5.
CantCWoodcockJ (2020) Fast food shutdown: from disorganisation to action in the service sector. Capital and Class44(4): 513–521.
6.
ChestersJCuervoH (2019) Adjusting to new employment landscapes: consequences of precarious employment for young Australians. The Economic and Labour Relations Review30(2): 222–240.
7.
ChowdhuryAŻukP (2018) From crisis to crisis: capitalism, chaos and constant unpredictability. The Economic and Labour Relations Review29(4): 375–393.
8.
DevereuxHWadsworthE (2020) Work scheduling and work location control in precarious and ‘permanent’ employment. The Economic and Labour Relations Review32(2): 230–246.
9.
FioritoJGallagherDGRussellZA, et al. (2019) Precarious work, young workers, and union-related attitudes: distrust of employers, workplace collective efficacy, and union efficacy. Labor Studies Journal46(1): 5–32.
10.
GallG (2020) Emerging forms of worker collectivism among the precariat: when will capital’s ‘gig’ be up?Capital and Class44(4): 485–492.
11.
GauffinK (2020) Precariousness on the Swedish labour market: a theoretical and empirical account. The Economic and Labour Relations Review31(2): 279–298.
12.
HardyJ (2015) The institutional, structural and agential embeddedness of precarity. Warsaw Forum of Economic Sociology6(11): 7–25.
HorkheimerMAdornoTW (2007) Dialectic of Enlightenment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
15.
ItegbojeJChangK (2021) Agency workers and their equivocal roles - wandering employees?Labor History62(2): 115–133.
16.
KarolakM (2020) Społeczno-ekonomiczne konteksty prekaryzacji pracy młodych w Polsce. In: MrozowickiACzarzastyJ (eds), Oswajanie niepewności. Studia społeczno-ekonomiczne nad młodymi pracownikami sprekaryzowanymi. Warszawa: Scholar, pp. 49–72.
17.
KearseyJ (2020) Control, camaraderie and resistance: precarious work and organisation in hospitality. Capital and Class44(4): 503–511.
18.
KılıçS (2020) Does COVID-19 as a long wave turning point mean the end of neoliberalism?Critical Sociology47(4–5): 609–623.
19.
KirkE (2020) Contesting ‘bogus self-employment’ via legal mobilisation: the case of foster care workers. Capital and Class44(4): 531–539.
20.
KleinN (2007) The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. Toronto, ON: Random House of Canada.
21.
LarmerM (2017) Permanent precarity: capital and labour in the Central African copperbelt. Labor History58(2): 170–184.
22.
LohmeyerBATaylorN (2020) War, heroes and sacrifice: masking neoliberal violence during the COVID-19 pandemic. Critical Sociology47(4–5): 625–639.
23.
MagyarBVasarhelyiJ (eds), (2017) Twenty-Five Sides of a Post-Communist Mafia State. Budapest, Hungary: Central European University Press.
MeardiGSimmsMAdamD (2021) Trade unions and precariat in Europe: representative claims. European Journal of Industrial Relations27(1): 41–58.
26.
MeardiGTrappmannV (2013) Between consolidation and crisis: divergent pressures and sectoral trends in Poland. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research19(2): 195–204.
27.
MertonRK (1968) Social Theory and Social Structure. New York, NY: Free Press.
28.
MooreSNewsomeK (2018) Paying for free delivery: dependent self-employment as a measure of precarity in parcel delivery. Work, Employment and Society32(3): 475–492.
29.
MrozowickiATrappmannV (2020) Precarity as a biographical problem? Young workers living with precarity in Germany and Poland. Work, Employment and Society35(2): 221–238.
30.
MurshedSM (2020) Capitalism and COVID-19: crisis at the crossroads. Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy26(3): 1–8. DOI: 10.1515/peps-2020-0026.
31.
OECD [Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development] (2021) Hours worked (indicator). Available at: DOI: 10.1787/47be1c78-en (accessed 19 November 2021).
OrensteinMABugaričB (2020) Work, family, Fatherland: the political economy of populism in central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Public Policy: 1–20. Epub ahead of print 19 October. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2020.1832557.
35.
OstD (2018) Workers and the radical right in Poland. International Labor and Working-Class History93: 113–124.
ParetM (2019) Building labor solidarity in precarious times: the danger of union paternalism. Labor Studies Journal44(4): 314–332.
38.
RobinsonWI (2020) Global capitalism post-pandemic. Race & Class62(2): 3–13.
39.
RuberyJGrimshawDKeizerA, et al. (2018) Challenges and contradictions in the ‘normalising’ of precarious work. Work, Employment and Society32(3): 509–527.
40.
Saad-FilhoA (2020) From COVID-19 to the end of neoliberalism. Critical Sociology46(4–5): 477–485.
41.
SallaiDSchnyderG (2018) The Transformation of Post-Socialist Capitalism – from Developmental State to Clan State?No. GPERC57. Greenwich Paper in Political Economy. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3100775.
42.
ScheiringG (2020) Workers and neo-nationalism. In: ScheiringG (ed), The Retreat of Liberal Democracy. Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 187–216.
43.
SennettR (1998) The Corrosion of Character: The Personal. Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism. London and New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
SheenV (2017) The implications of Australian women’s precarious employment for the later pension age. The Economic and Labour Relations Review28(1): 3–19.
46.
ShieldsS (2019) The paradoxes of necessity: fail forwards neoliberalism, social reproduction, recombinant populism and Poland’s 500Plus policy. Capital and Class43(4): 653–669.
47.
ShieldsS (2021) Domesticating neoliberalism: ‘Domification’ and the contradictions of the populist countermovement in Poland. Europe-Asia Studies73: 1622–1640. DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2021.1972937.
48.
SmithCPunN (2018) Class and precarity: an unhappy coupling in China’s working class formation. Work, Employment and Society32(3): 599–615.
49.
StandingG (2011) The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
50.
StubbsPLendvai‐BaintonN (2020) Authoritarian neoliberalism, radical conservatism and social policy within the European Union: Croatia, Hungary and Poland. Development and Change51(2): 540–560.
51.
ŠumonjaM (2021) Neoliberalism is not dead – On political implications of Covid-19. Capital and Class45(2): 215–227.
52.
ThelenK (2019) The American precariat: US capitalism in comparative perspective. Perspectives on Politics17(1): 5–27.
53.
TrappmannV (2011) Precarious employment in Poland: a legacy of transition or an effect of European integration. Employment and Economy in Central and Eastern Europe (Emecon)2(1): 1–22.
54.
UrbańskiJ (2014) Prekariat i nowa walka Klas: przeobraż enia współczesnej klasy pracowniczej i jej form walki. Warszawa, Poland: Instytut Wydawniczy Książka i Prasa.
55.
van BarneveldKQuinlanMKrieslerP, et al. (2020) The COVID-19 pandemic: lessons on building more equal and sustainable societies. The Economic and Labour Relations Review31(2): 133–157.
56.
WongVAu-YeungTC (2019) Autonomous precarity or precarious autonomy? Dilemmas of young workers in Hong Kong. The Economic and Labour Relations Review30(2): 241–261.
57.
WoodAJ (2020) Beyond mobilisation at McDonald’s: towards networked organising. Capital and Class44(4): 493–502.
58.
WrightEO (2016) Is the precariat a class?Global Labour Journal7(2): 123–135.
59.
Zafar SheikhASaleem ButtAHussainB, et al. (2021) Dodgy labour market dichotomy: the repercussions of sneaky labour intermediaries on employees’ constitutional rights. Labor History62(1): 91–107.
60.
ŻukP (2007) Struktura a kultura. O uwarunkowaniach orientacji emancypacyjnych w społeczeństwie polskim. Warszawa, Poland: Scholar.
61.
ŻukP (2017) Employment structures, employee attitudes and workplace resistance in neoliberal Poland. The Economic and Labour Relations Review28(1): 91–112.
62.
ŻukPToporowskiJ (2020) Capitalism after communism: the triumph of neoliberalism, nationalist reaction and waiting for the leftist wave. The Economic and Labour Relations Review31(2): 158–171.
63.
ŻukPŻukP (2018) Retirees without pensions and welfare: the social effects of pension privatization in Poland. Critical Social Policy38(2): 407–417.
64.
ŻukPŻukPLisiewicz-JakubaszkoJ (2019) Labour migration of doctors and nurses and the impact on the quality of health care in Eastern European countries: the case of Poland. The Economic and Labour Relations Review30(2): 307–320.
