Work conditions and financial difficulties in post-crisis Europe: Utility versus quality of working life

Abstract

This article critically examines the relation between work and utility and challenges the mainstream economic view of well-being as a hedonic state for which work is a less pleasurable trade-off. It proposes a conception of work as a potential source of eudaimonic well-being, providing meaning and contributing to human flourishing and self-realisation. Based on micro-level data, the article shows the relevance of distinguishing between hedonic and eudaimonic well-being by way of comparing the effects of increased financial difficulties and deteriorated work conditions on these two types of well-being in five European Union countries – Germany, Poland, Portugal, Sweden and the UK – in the post global financial crisis years between 2009 and 2014. The article concludes by underlining the political importance of addressing aspects pertaining to the quality of working life and of creating jobs that serve to improve the eudaimonic well-being of citizens.

JEL Codes: I31, J28, J81

Keywords

Eudaimonia Germany global financial crisis meaningful work Poland Portugal quality of working life Sweden United Kingdom work

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Benjamin

Heffetz

Kimbal

et al . (2014) Beyond happiness and satisfaction: toward well-being indices based on stated preferences. American Economic Review 104(9): 2698–2735.

Boffo

Brown

Spencer

(2017) From happiness to social provisioning: addressing well-being in times of crisis. New Political Economy 22(4): 450–462.

Bruni

(2008) The happiness of sociality. Economics and eudaimonia: a necessary encounter. Rationality and Society 22(4): 383–406.

Carroll

(2007) Unemployment and psychological well-being. Economic Record 83(262): 287–302.

Charness

Kuhn

(2011) Lab labor: what can labor economists learn from the lab? In: Ashenfelter

Card

(eds) Handbook of Labor Economics (Volume A.4). Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 229–330.

Clark

(2015) What makes a good job? Job quality and job satisfaction. IZA World of Work. Available at: https://wol.iza.org/articles/what-makes-good-job-job-quality-and-job-satisfaction/long (accessed 7 January 2019).

Clark

(2016) SWB as a measure of individual well-being. In: Adler

Fleurbaey

(eds) The Oxford Handbook of Well-being and Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 518–552.

Deci

Ryan

(2008) Hedonia, eudaimonia and well-being: an introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies 9(1): 1–11.

Derobert

(2001) On the genesis of the canonical labor supply model. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 23(2): 197–215.

10.

Dickinson

(1999) An experimental examination of labor supply and work intensities. Journal of Labor Economics 17(4): 638–670.

11.

Dickinson

Villeval

M-C

(2008) Does monitoring increase work effort? The complementarity between agency and crowding-out theories. Games and Economic Behavior 63(1): 56–76.

12.

Findlay

Kalleberg

Warhust

(2013) The challenges of job quality. Human Relations 66(4): 441–451.

13.

Gallie

(ed.) (2013a) Economic Crisis, Quality of Work and Social Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

14.

Gallie

(2013b) Direct participation and the quality of work. Human Relations 66(4): 453–473.

15.

Green

Felstead

Gallie

et al . (2016) Job-related well-being through the great recession. Journal of Happiness Studies 17(1): 389–411.

16.

Hausman

Ruud

(1987) Specifying and testing econometric models for rank-ordered data. Journal of Econometrics 34(1–2): 83–104.

17.

Helliwell

Huang

(2014) New measures of the cost of unemployment. Economic Inquiry 52(4): 1485–1502.

18.

Hinchcliffe

(2004) Work and human flourishing. Educational Philosophy and Theory 36(5): 535–547.

19.

Kahneman

Thaler

(1991) Economic analysis and the psychology of utility: applications to compensation policy. American Economic Review 81(2): 341–346.

20.

Kahneman

Kruege

Schkabe

et al . (2004) A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: the day reconstruction method. Science 306(5702): 1776–1780.

21.

Kaufmann

(1999) Expanding the behavioral foundations of labor economics. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 52(3): 361–392.

22.

Kopperud

Vitterso

(2008) Distinctions between hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology 3(3): 174–181.

23.

Lopes

(2011) Why do people work? Individual wants versus common goods. Journal of Economic Issues 45(1): 57–74.

24.

Lopes

(2018) The moral dimensions of the employment relationship. Journal of Institutional Economics 14(1): 103–125.

25.

Lopes

Lagoa

Calapez

(2014) Work autonomy, work pressure and job satisfaction: an analysis of EU countries. The Economic and Labour Relations Review 25(2): 306–326.

26.

Marshall

(1966 [1890]) Principles of Economics. London: MacMillan.

27.

Méda

Vendramin

(2013) Réinventer le Travail. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

28.

Mitra

Jenkins

Gupta

et al . (2015) The utility of pay raises/cuts. Journal of Economic Psychology 49: 150–166.

29.

Niemiec

Ryan

Deci

(2009) The path taken: consequences of attaining intrinsic and extrinsic aspirations in post-college life. Journal of Research in Personality 73(3): 291–306.

30.

OECD (2015) In It Together: Why Less Inequality Benefits All. Paris: OECD.

31.

Piekalkiewicz

(2017) Why do economists study happiness? The Economic and Labour Relations Review 28(3): 361–377.

32.

Rebitzer

Taylor

(2011) Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motives: standard and behavioural approaches to agency and labor markets. In: Ashenfelter

Card

(eds) Handbook of Labor Economics (Volume A.4). Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 701–772.

33.

Rosen

(1986) The theory of equalizing differences. In: Ashenfelter

Card

(eds) Handbook of Labor Economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 641–692.

34.

Rosso

Dekas

Wrzesniewski

(2010) On the meaning of work: a theoretical integration and review. Research in Organizational Behavior 30: 91–127.

35.

Ryan

Deci

(2001) On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology 52: 141–1666.

36.

Ryan

Veronica

Deci

(2008) Living well: a self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies 9(1): 139–170.

37.

Ryff

(2014) Psychological well-being revisited: advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 83(1): 10–28.

38.

Ryff

Singer

(2000) Interpersonal flourishing: a positive health agenda for the new millennium. Personality and Social Psychology Review 4(1): 30–44.

39.

Santos

Lopes

Betzelt

(2017) Financialisation and work in the EU: inequality, debt and labour market segmentation. Revista de Economía Mundial 46: 91–116.

40.

Santos

Lopes

Costa

(2016) FESSUD finance and well-being survey: report. FESSUD working paper no. 130. Available at: http://fessud.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/FESSUD-Finance-and-Well-being-Survey-Report-working-paper-130_ana.pdf (accessed 6 January 2019).

41.

Son

Wilson

(2012) Volunteer work and hedonic, eudemonic and social well-being. Sociological Forum 27(3): 658–681.

42.

Steger

Dik

Duffy

(2012) Measuring meaningful work: the work and meaning inventory (WAMI). Journal of Career Assessment 20(3): 322–337.

43.

Theorell

Hammarström

Aronsson

et al . (2015) A systematic review including meta-analysis of work environment and depressive symptoms. BMC Public Health 15: 738–752.

44.

Wells

(2010) An examination of the utility bearing characteristics of occupations. Economics Letters 108(3): 296–298.

45.

Winkelmann

(1998) Why are the unemployed so unhappy? Evidence from panel data. Economica 65(257): 1–15.