It is often argued that job insecurity and precarious work are on the rise. However, the evidence to back these arguments remains mixed and inconclusive. In this study, we define and measure precarious work in Finland using five variables that reflect both objective and subjective insecurity: atypical employment, actually experienced unemployment, the threat of dismissal or unemployment, poor chances of finding a new job, and low earnings. Results based on Statistics Finland’s Quality of Work Life Surveys from 1984 to 2013 indicate that, from a labour market or forms of employment perspective, the proportion of precarious wage earners has increased from 11% in 1984 to 13% in 2013. From a second perspective, however, focusing on changing working conditions, growing inequality and eroding social security mechanisms, we also analyse how a precarious labour market position is related to intrinsic job quality. Precarious workers experience decreased levels of skill and discretion, and they work in a less supportive environment than other employees.
ChanS (2013) ‘I am king’: financialisation and the paradox of precarious work. The Economic and Labour Relations Review24(3): 362–379.
2.
ChengGHLChanDKS (2008) Who suffers more from job insecurity? A meta-analytic review. Applied Psychology57(2): 272–303.
3.
De BustilloRFFernández-MacíasEAntónJ-I. (2011) Measuring More than Money: The Social Economics of Job Quality. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
4.
De WispelaereJ (2015) An Income of One’s Own? The Political Analysis of Universal Basic Income. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
5.
Della PortaDHänninenSSiisiäinenM. (eds) (2015) The New Social Division: Making and Unmaking Precariousness. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
6.
DooganK (2009) New Capitalism? The Transformation of Work. Cambridge: Polity Press.
7.
DooganK (2015) Precarity – Minority condition or majority experience? In: Della PortaDHänninenSSiisiäinenM. (eds) The New Social Division: Making and Unmaking Precariousness. London: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 43–62.
8.
Eurofound (2012) Fifth European Working Conditions Survey. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
9.
Eurofound (2015) 3rd European Company Survey – Overview Report: Workplace Practices – Patterns, Performance and Well-Being. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
10.
European Commission (2004) Precarious Employment in Europe: A Comparative Study of Labour Market Related Risks in Flexible Economies. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
11.
FevreR (2007) Employment insecurity and social theory: the power of nightmares. Work, Employment & Society21(3): 517–535.
12.
GallieD (2008) Task discretion and job quality. In: GallieD (ed.) Employment Regimes and the Quality of Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 105–136.
13.
GreenF (2006) Demanding Work: The Paradox of Job Quality in the Affluent Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
GreenFMostafaT (2012) Trends in Job Quality in Europe: A Report Based on the Fifth European Working Conditions Survey. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
15.
International Labour Organization (ILO) (2012) From Precarious Work to Decent Work: Outcome Document to the Workers’ Symposium on Policies and Regulations to Combat Precarious Employment. Geneva: ILO.
16.
JokinenE (2016) Precarious everyday agency. European Journal of Cultural Studies19(1): 85–99.
17.
KalelaJKianderJKivikuruU. (eds) (2001) Down from the Heavens, up from the Ashes: The Finnish Economic Crisis of the 1990s in the Light of Economic and Social Research. Helsinki: VATT – Government Institute for Economic Research.
18.
KallebergAL (2011) Good Jobs, Bad Jobs: The Rise of Polarized and Precarious Employment in the United States, 1970s to 2000s. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
19.
KallebergAL (2012) Job quality and precarious work: clarifications, controversies, and challenges. Work and Occupations39(4): 427–448.
20.
KallebergAL (2014) Measuring precarious work. Working paper of the EINet Measurement group, University of Chicago School of Social Service Administration, Chicago, IL, November.
21.
KarasekRTheorellT (1990) Healthy Work: Stress, Productivity, and the Reconstruction of Working Life. New York: Basic Books.
22.
KauhanenMNättiJ (2015) Involuntary temporary and part-time work, job quality and well-being at work. Social Indicators Research120(3): 789–799.
23.
LiukkonenV (2012) Non-Standard Employment and Health with Respect to Sense of Coherence and Social Capital. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
24.
Ministry of Employment and the Economy (2010) Finland’s Regional Development Strategy 2020. Helsinki: Ministry of Employment and the Economy.
25.
Ministry of Employment and the Economy (2012) Finnish Labour Legislation and Industrial Relations. Helsinki: Ministry of Employment and the Economy.
NeilsonBRossiterN (2008) Precarity as a political concept, or, Fordism as exception. Theory, Culture & Society25(7–8): 51–72.
28.
OinasTAnttilaTMustosmäkiA. (2012) The Nordic difference: job quality in Europe 1995–2010. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies2(4): 135–152.
29.
OjalaSPyöriäP (2015) Working around the clock? – The time and location of paid work in Finland, 1979–2010. Electronic International Journal of Time Use Research12(1): 73–96.
30.
OlsthoornM (2014) Measuring precarious employment: a proposal for two indicators of precarious employment based on set-theory and tested with Dutch labor market-data. Social Indicators Research119(1): 421–441.
31.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2014) How’s Life in Finland? OECD Better Life Initiative. Paris: OECD.
32.
Puig-BarrachinaVVanroelenCVivesA. (2014) Measuring employment precariousness in the European Working Conditions Survey: the social distribution in Europe. Work49(1): 143–161.
33.
PyöriäPMelinHBlomR (2005) Knowledge Workers in the Information Society: Evidence from Finland. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
34.
QuinlanM (2012) The ‘pre-invention’ of precarious employment: the changing world of work in context. The Economic and Labour Relations Review23(4): 3–24.
35.
RodgersGRodgersJ (eds) (1989) Precarious Jobs in Labour Market Regulation: The Growth of Atypical Employment in Western Europe. Geneva: ILO.
36.
RokkanenMUusitaloR (2013) Changes in job stability – Evidence from lifetime job histories. Finnish Economic Papers26(2): 36–55.
37.
RuostetsaariI (2015) Elite Recruitment and Coherence of the Inner Core of Power in Finland: Changing Patterns during the Economic Crises of 1991–2011. London: Lexington Books.
38.
SiegristJStarkeaDChandolabT. (2004) The measurement of effort–reward imbalance at work: European comparisons. Social Science & Medicine58(8): 1483–1499.
39.
SoininenT (2015) Changing Expectations and Realities of Employment Stability – Longitudinal Analysis on Tenures in Finland. Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland.
40.
StandingG (2011) The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury.
41.
SutelaHLehtoA-M (2014) Työolojen muutokset 1977–2013 [Changes in Working Conditions 1977–2013]. Helsinki: Statistics Finland.
42.
SverkeMHellgrenJ (2002) The nature of job insecurity: understanding employment uncertainty on the brink of a new millennium. Applied Psychology51(1): 23–42.
43.
TompaEScott-MarshallHDolinschiR. (2007) Precarious employment experiences and their health consequences: towards a theoretical framework. Work28(3): 209–224.
44.
VoskoLF (2010) Managing the Margins: Gender, Citizenship, and the International Regulation of Precarious Employment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45.
WilsonSEbertN (2013) Precarious work: economic, sociological and political perspectives. The Economic and Labour Relations Review24(3): 263–278.
