Based on European Working Conditions Survey (EWCS) micro-data, we show that, on average, work autonomy has declined and work pressure has increased in most European Union countries since 1995. Since such evolution is substantially detrimental for workers, we examine whether workers of varied skill levels in different countries have been equally impacted. Descriptive analysis shows that low-skill clerical workers are the most affected and that Scandinavian countries fare better. Econometric results show that the decline in job satisfaction is due mainly to the increase in work pressure—which might be reaching a limit for high-skill workers—and that job satisfaction is most affected by an increase in work pressure when this is not accompanied by greater work autonomy.
BauerT (2004) High performance workplace practices and job satisfaction: Evidence from Europe. IZA Discussion paper no. 1265, August. Bonn: IZA.
2.
BartoliniSBilanciniEPugnoM (2013) Did the decline in social connections depress Americans’ happiness?Social Indicators Research110(3): 1033–1059.
3.
BrownACharlwoodAFordeC. (2007) Job quality and the economics of new labour. Cambridge Journal of Economics31(6): 941–971.
4.
BustilloRFernández-MacíasEEsteveF. (2011) E pluribus unum? A critical survey of Job quality indicators. Socio-Economic Review9(3): 447–502.
5.
ClarkA (2005) Your money or your life: changing job quality in OECD countries. British Journal of Industrial Relations43(3): 377–400.
6.
DannaKGriffinR (1999) Health and well-being in the workplace: a review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Management25(3): 357–384.
7.
DavoineLEhrelCGuergoat-LariviereM (2008) Monitoring quality in work. International Labour Review147(2–3): 163–198.
8.
De JongeJKompierM (1997) A critical examination of the demand-control-support model from a work psychological perspective. International Journal of Stress Management4(4): 235–258.
9.
De LangeATarisTKompierM. (2003) The very best of the millennium. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology8(4): 282–305.
10.
DejoursC (2009) Travail vivant – Travail et emancipation.Paris: Payot.
11.
DhondtSKraanKSlotenG (2002) Work organization, technology and working conditions. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.
12.
EsserIOlsenK (2012) Perceived job quality: autonomy and job security within a multilevel framework. European Sociological Review28(4): 443–454.
13.
European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Eurofound) (1995) European Working Conditions Survey (computer files). SN: 5604, March2007. London: UK Data Archive (distributor). Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-5604-1
14.
European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Eurofound) (2000) European Working Conditions Survey (computer files). SN: 5286, March2007. London: UK Data Archive (distributor). Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-5286-1
15.
European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Eurofound) (2005) European Working Conditions Survey (computer files). SN: 5639, May2007. London: UK Data Archive (distributor). Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-5639-1
16.
European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Eurofound) (2007) Measuring Job Satisfaction in Surveys—Comparative Analytical Report. Dublin: Eurofound.
17.
European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Eurofound) (2010a) Changes over time—first findings from the fifth European Working Conditions Survey. Available at: http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/pubdocs/2010/74/en/3/EF1074EN.pdf (accessed 21 March 2012).
18.
European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Eurofound) (2010b) EWCS (computer file). SN: 6971, February2012. London: UK Data Archive (distributor). Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-6971-1
19.
GagnéMDeciE (2005) Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior26(4): 331–362.
20.
GallieD (2003) The quality of working life: is Scandinavia different?European Sociological Review19(1): 61–79.
21.
GallieD (2007) Task discretion and job quality. In: DuncanG (ed.) Employment Regimes and the Quality of Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 105–136.
22.
GreenF (2004) Work intensification, discretion, and the decline in well-being at work. Eastern Economic Journal30(4): 615–625.
23.
GreenF (2006) Demanding Work. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
24.
GreenFTsitsianisN (2005) An investigation of national trends in job satisfaction in Britain and Germany. British Journal of Industrial Relations43(3): 401–429.
25.
JudgeTThoresenCBonoJ. (2001) The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: a qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin127(3): 376–407.
26.
KarasekRA (1979) Job demands, job decision latitude and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly24: 285–308.
27.
KarasekRTheorellT (1990) Healthy Work: Stress, Productivity and the Reconstruction of Work Life. New York: Basic Books.
28.
KnudsenHBusckOLindJ (2011) Work environment quality: the role of workplace participation and democracy. Work, Employment and Society25(3): 379–396.
29.
LopesHLagoaSCalapezT (2014) Declining autonomy at work in the EU and its effect on civic participation. Economic and Industrial Democracy. 35(2): 341–366.
30.
MansellABroughP (2005) A comprehensive test of the job-demands-control interaction. Australian Journal of Psychology57(2): 103–114.
31.
MeulmanJvan der KooijAHeiserW (2004) Principal components analysis with nonlinear optimal scaling transformations. In: KaplanD (ed.) The Sage Handbook of Quantitative Methodology for the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 49–70.
32.
NguyenANTaylorJBradleyS (2003) Job autonomy and job satisfaction: new evidence. Working-paper 2003/050, August. Lancaster: Lancaster University.
33.
RoseM (2003) Good deal, bad deal? Job satisfaction in occupations. Work, Employment and Society17(3): 503–530.
34.
RyanRDeciE (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist55(1): 68–78.
35.
SiegristJ (2006) Work, health and welfare: new challenges. International Journal of Social Welfare15(Suppl. 1): S5–S12.
36.
Sousa-PozaASousa-PozaA (2000) Well-being at work: a cross-national analysis of the levels and determinants of job satisfaction. The Journal of Socio-Economics29: 517–538.
37.
SpectorP (1986) Perceived control by employees: a meta-analysis of studies concerning autonomy and participation at work. Human Relations39(11): 1005–1016.
38.
UtmanCH (1997) Performance effects of motivational state: a meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review1(2): 170–182.
39.
Van der DoefMMaesS (2010) The job-demand-control-(support) model and psychological well-being. Work and Stress: An International Journal of Work, Health and Occupations12(2): 87–114.
