Should the Australian labour movement pursue a system of statutory union recognition? The experiences of the UK and Canada illustrate that such a system can address some of the worst breaches of freedom of association under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth). However, the influence on union density and collective bargaining coverage is likely to be modest. It may also constitute a structural impediment to multi-employer bargaining, boxing unions into a system of fragmented bargaining, and results are sensitive to institutional design so there could be serious consequences if the system was re-engineered towards the US model in the future.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ACTU (2006) A fair go at work: Collective bargaining for Australian workers. Report by an ACTU Delegation, September.
AdamsR. (1999) ‘Why statutory union recognition is bad labour policy: The North American experience’, Industrial Relations Journal, 30(2), pp.96–100.
4.
ArthursH.CarterD.GlasbeekHFudgeJ. (1988) ‘Canada’, in BlanpainR. (ed.), International Encyclopedia for Labour Law and Industrial Relations, Kluwer, Deventer, Netherlands.
5.
BriggsC. (2005) ‘Lockout law in comparative perspective: Corporatism, pluralism and neo-liberalism’, International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 21(3), pp. 481–502.
6.
BriggsC. (2006) ‘The return of lockouts down under in comparative perspective: Globalisation, the state and employer militancy’, Comparative Political Studies, 20(10), pp. 1–25.
7.
BriggsC. (2007) ‘After the storm: Union renewal in the UK and New Zealand’, International Labour Process Conference, Amsterdam, April 2–4.
8.
BronfenbrennerK. (2003) ‘The American labor movement and the resurgence in union organising’, in FairbrotherP.YatesC. (eds.), Trade Unions in Renewal: a Comparative Study, Continuum, London, pp. 32–50.
9.
BronfenbrennerK.JuravichT. (1994) ‘The impact of employer opposition on union certification win rates: a private/public sector comparison’, Economic Policy Institute Working Paper No. 113, Economic Policy Institute, Washington, DC.
CookeW. (1985) ‘The failure to negotiate first contracts: Determinants and policy implications', Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 38(2), pp. 163–178.
12.
Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) (2003a) Review of the Employment Relations Act 1999: Government Response to the Public Consultation, Available: http://www.dti.gov.uk/files/file21205.pdf [accessed 17 November 2006].
13.
Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) (2003b) Review of the Employment Relations Act 1999: Consultation Document, Available: http://www.dti.gov.uk/files/file21201.pdf [accessed 17 November 2006].
14.
DickensW. (1983) ‘The effect of company campaigns on certification elections: Law and reality once again’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 36(4), pp. 560–575.
15.
EwingK.MooreSWoodS. (2003). Unfair Labour Practices: Trade Union Recognition and Employer Resistance, Institute of Employment Rights, United Kingdom.
16.
ForsythASutherlandC. (2006) ‘From “uncharted seas” to “stormy waters“: How will trade unions fare under Work Choices', Economic and Labour Relations Review, 16(2), pp. 215–236.
17.
GallG. (2003) ‘Employer opposition to union recognition’, in GallG. (ed), Union Organizing: Campaigning for Trade Union Recognition, Routledge, London, pp. 79–96.
18.
GallG. (2004) ‘Trade union recognition in Britain, 1995–2002: Turning a corner?’, Industrial Relations Journal, 35(3), pp. 249–270.
19.
GallG. (2006). ‘Trade union recognition in Britain — An Emerging crisis for trade unions', Available: http://uin.org.uk/content/view/142/70/ [accessed 11 September 2006].
20.
GodardJ. (2004) ‘Trade union recognition: Statutory unfair labour practice regimes in the USA and Canada’, Department of Trade and Industry Employment Relations Research Series no. 29, Department of Trade and Industry, London.
21.
HeeryE.SimmsM. (2006) ‘Union organising under certification law in Britain’, in GallG. (ed), Union Recognition: Organising and Bargaining Outcomes, Routledge, London, pp. 44–63.
22.
Institute of Employment Rights (2004) The Future of Employment Law: Which Way for the Next Manifesto?, Seminar Proceedings, March 2.
JohnsonS. (2002) ‘Card check or mandatory representation vote? How the type of union recognition procedure affects union certification success', The Economic Journal, 112(479), pp. 344–361.
25.
JordanL.BrunoB. (2006) ‘Does the organising means determine the bargaining ends?’, in GallG. (ed), Union Recognition: Organising and Bargaining Outcomes, Routledge, London, pp. 181–197.
26.
McCallumR. (2002) ‘Good faith bargaining, protected action and the need for a statutory trade union recognition procedure’, Tenth ACIRRT Annual Labour Law Conference, Sydney.
27.
McKayS.MooreS. (2005) ‘The Role of ACAS in trade union recognition claims under the Employment Relations Act 1999’, Research Paper 03/05, ACAS, London.
28.
McKayS.MooreS.WoodH. (2006) ‘The nature of collective bargaining achieved through the statutory procedure’, in GallG. (ed.), Union Recognition: Organising and Bargaining Outcomes, Routledge, London, pp. 98–114.
29.
MeltzN. (1985) ‘Labor movements in Canada and United States', in KochanT. (ed.), Challenges and Choices Facing American Labor, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 315–334.
30.
NoakesDCardell-ReeA. (2001) ‘Recent cases: Individual contracts and the freedom to associate’, Australian Journal of Labour Law, 14(3), pp 89–96.
31.
OECD. (2004) Employment Outlook, OECD, Paris.
32.
OxenbridgeS.BrownW.DeakinS.PrattenC. (2003) ‘Initial responses to the statutory recognition provisions of the Employment Relations Act 1999’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 41(2), pp. 315–334.
33.
PeetzD. (2006) Brave New Workplace: How Individual Contracts are Changing Our Jobs, Allen and Unwin, Sydney.
QuinnD. (2004) ‘To be or not to be a member — Is that the only question? Freedom of association under the Workplace Relations Act’, Australian Journal of Labour Law, 17(1), pp. 1–34.
36.
RiddellC. (2001) ‘Union suppression and certification success', Canadian Journal of Economics, 34(2). pp. 396–410.
37.
RiddellC. (2004) ‘Union certification success under voting versus card-check procedures: Evidence from British Columbia, 1978–1998’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 57(4), pp.493–517.
38.
RileyJPetersonK. (2006) Work Choices: A Guide to the 2005 Changes, Thomson, Sydney.
39.
RoseJ. (2006) ‘Collective Bargaining Performance of Newly Certified Unions in Canada: Process and Outcomes', in GallG. (ed.), Union Recognition: Organising and Bargaining Outcomes, Routledge, London, pp. 198–214.
40.
RoseJ.ChaisonG. (1996) ‘Linking Union Density and Union Effectiveness: The North American Experience’, Industrial Relations, 35(1): 78–105.
41.
ThomasonT. (1994) ‘The effect of accelerated certification procedures on union organising success in Ontario’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 47(2), pp. 207–226.
42.
ThomasonT.PozzebonS. (1998) ‘Managerial opposition to union certification in Quebec and Ontario’, Relations Industrielles, 53(4), pp. 750–771.
43.
TownleyB. (1987) ‘Union recognition: A comparative analysis of the pros and cons of a legal procedure’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 25(2), pp. 177–199.
44.
VernonG. (2006). ‘Does density matter? The significance of comparative historical variation in unionization’. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 12(2), pp. 189–209.
45.
VisserJ. (2006). ‘Union membership statistics in 24 countries'. Monthly Labor Review, No. 1, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington.
46.
WeilerP. (1983) ‘Promises to keep: Securing workers' rights to self-organisation under the NLRA’, Harvard Law Review, 96(8), pp. 1769–1827.
47.
WoodS.GodardJ. (1999) ‘The statutory union recognition procedure in the Employment Relations Bill: A comparative analysis', British Journal of Industrial Relations, 37(2), pp. 203–245.
48.
WoodS.MooreS.EwingK. (2003) ‘The impact of the trade union recognition procedure under the Employment Relations Act 2000–02’, in GospelH.WoodS. (eds), Representing Workers: Union Recognition and Membership in Britain, Routledge, London, pp. 119–143.
49.
Workplace Express. (2002) ‘DEWR Deal Sinks Under No Vote’, July 19, [Online], Available: http://www.workplaceexpress.com.au/ [accessed 20 February 2006].
