The KEF developed its identity, role and activities in the face of challenges to employers quite different to those that marked the history of employer associations in western countries. Only in recent years have economic and political developments generated perceived threats from unions and pro-labour legislative proposals. Instead, the KEF had to find ways of attracting, holding and uniting members in the absence of these threats. The result was a very limited organisation operating at low levels. As those threats emerged more fully through Korea's democratisation process, the KEF responded to pressures to raise its profile, broaden its activities and sharpen its identity. In seeking to attract and retain members and to develop internal cohesion, macroeconomic and macro-political developments have been of crucial importance, as has the central role of large employers among the KEF membership.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsR.J. (1995) Industrial Relations under Liberal Democracy: North American in Comparative Perspective, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia.
2.
BaeK. S.ChoS. J. (2004) ‘Labour Movement’, in LeeW.D. (ed), Labour in Korea, the Korea Labour Institute, Seoul.
3.
BaeK. S.ChoS. J. (2003) ‘Labour Movement Limitations and Development Planning’, in The Korean Tripartite Commission (ed.), Policy Topics for the Development of Korean Industrial Relations, Policy Research 02, The Korean Tripartite Commission, Seoul (in Korean).
4.
BaglioniG.CrouchC. (1990) (eds) European Industrial Relations: The Challenge of Flexibility, Sage, London.
5.
BarbashJ.BarbashK. (1989) (eds) Theories and Concepts in Comparative Industrial Relations, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia SC.
BehrensM. (2003) ‘Is there a future for Employers' Collective Interest Representation?’, paper delivered at the IIRA 13th World Congress, Berlin, September 8–12, 2003.
BowmanJ. R. (2002) ‘Employers and the persistence of centralized wage setting: The Case of Norway’, Comparative Political Studies, 35(9): 995–1026.
10.
BroadP. (2001) ‘Australian business associations - their strategies for surviving the 1990s and beyond’, Labour & Industry, 11(3): 27–54.
11.
ChangD.O.ChaeJ.H. (2004) ‘The Transformation of Korean Labour Relations since 1997’, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 34(4): 427–448.
12.
Cheil Economic Daily, 1998–2003 (in Korean).
13.
CherryJ. (2003) ‘The ‘Big Deals' and Hynix Semiconductor: State-Business Relations in Post-Crisis Korea’, Asia Pacific Business Review, 10(2): 178–98.
14.
ChoJ.I. (2006) (Team leader, Management Innovation, KEF), Interviewed 8 April (in Korean).
15.
IlboChosun, 1998–2003 (in Korean).
16.
ChoN.H. (2006) (Former full-time executive vice-chairman, KEF), Interviewed 15 March (in Korean).
17.
CorsettiG.PesentiP.RoubiniN. (1998) ‘What caused the Asian currency and financial crisis?’, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, 6833–4.
18.
CrottyJ.LeeK. K. (2002) ‘A political-economic analysis of the failure of neo-liberal restructuring in post-crisis Korea’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 22: 667–678.
19.
DeyoF. C. (1989) Beneath the Miracle: Labour Subordination in the New Asian Industrialisation, University of California Press, Berkeley.
20.
Financial News, 1998–2003 (in Korean).
21.
GladstoneA. (1984) ‘Employers associations in comparative perspective: Functions and activities', in WindmullerJ.GladstoneA. (eds), Employers associations and industrial relations: a comparative study, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 24–43.
22.
Hankyoreh, 1998–2003 (in Korean).
23.
Hankyung, 1998–2003 (in Korean).
24.
HurJ. J. (2002) ‘Economic Crisis, Income Support and Employment Generating Programs: Korea's Experience’, Labour Policy Research, 2(4): 39–73.
25.
IMF (International Monetary Fund) (1998) Annual report of the Executive Board for the Financial Year Ended April 30 1998, IMF: Washington D.C.
26.
JeongI. (2004) ‘Unemployment Structure and Unemployment Schemes', in LeeW.D. (ed), Labour in Korea, the Korea Labour Institute, Seoul.
27.
JwaS. H.YiI. (2001) The Korean Financial Crisis: Evaluation and Lessons', in KwonO.Y.ShepherdW. (eds), Korea's economic prospects: from financial crisis to prosperity, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
28.
KEF, Annual Business Reports, 1970–2005 (in Korean).
29.
KEF, Financial Reports, 1988–2003, unpublished (in Korean).
30.
KEF (Korea Employers Federation) (2000) A Thirty-year History of the KEF, The KEF, Seoul (in Korean).
31.
KEF (Korea Employers Federation) (1990) A Twenty-year History of the KEF, The KEF, Seoul (in Korean).
KimD. W.KimS. (2003) ‘Globalisation, Financial Crisis, and Industrial Relations: The Case of South Korea’, Industrial Relations, 42(3): 341–367.
34.
KimH.R. (2001) ‘Economic Crisis in Korea: Toward a New Economic Paradigm’, in KwonO.Y.ShepherdW. (eds), Korea's economic prospects: from financial crisis to prosperity, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
35.
KimK.S. (2004) Korean Labour Movement: 6. The Labour Movement during the Democratisation Period, 1987–1997, Jisikmadang, Seoul (in Korean).
36.
KimS. S.BriscoeD.R. (1997) ‘Globalization and a new human resource policy in Korea: Transformation to a performance based HRM’, Employee Relations, 19(4): 289–308.
37.
Korea Herald, 1998–2003.
38.
Korea Times, 1998–2003.
39.
KTC (Korea Tripartite Commission) (2003) A Five-year History of the KTC, the KTC, Seoul (in Korean).
40.
KwonS.D. (2006) (Director, Business Information Management Team, Hyundai Car), Interviewed 16 March (in Korean).
41.
Kyunghyang Shinmoon, 1998–2003 (in Korean).
42.
ParkS.I. (2000) Reforming Labour Management Relations: Lessons from the Korean Experiences: 1996–7, the Korea Development Institute, Seoul.
43.
PlowmanD.H. (1989) Holding the Line: Compulsory arbitration and national employer co-ordination in Australia, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
44.
LeeD.E. (2006) (full-time Executive Director, KEF), Interviewed 21 March (in Korean).
45.
LeeW. B. (2004) Korean Labour Movement: 5. The Labour Movement during the Industrialisation Period, 1961–1987, Jisikmadang, Seoul (in Korean).
46.
LeeW. D.LeeJ. H. (2004) ‘Will the Model of Uncoordinated Decentralization Persist? Changes in Korean Industrial Relations after the Financial Crisis', in Katz (eds), The New Structure of Labour Relations, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
47.
LieJ. (1998) Han Unbound: The Political Economy of South Korea, Stanford University Press, California.
48.
LimS.H. (2002) Strategy Matters: A Constructivist Approach to The South Korean Social Pact, Unpublished Ph.D dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
49.
LimW. (2003) ‘Origin and evolution of the Korean economic system’, in TchaM.J.SuhC.S. (eds), The Korean Economy at the Crossroads, Routledge Curzon, London.
50.
MacdonaldD. (1997) Industrial Relations and Globalisation: Challenges for Employers and their organisations, Paper presented at the ILO Workshop on Employers' Organizations, in Asia-Pacific in the Twenty-First Century, Turin, Italy, 5–13 May.
51.
MartinJ. P.TergeistP.ToresR. (2004) ‘Reforming the Korean Labour Market and Social Safety Net: Key Pending Issues', in HarvieC.LeeH. H.OhJ. (eds), The Korean Economy: Post-Crisis Policies, Issues and Prospects, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
52.
MurhemS. (2003) Turning to Europe: A New Swedish Industrial Relations Regime in the 1990s, Dissertation, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
53.
OgleG. E. (1990) South Korea: Dissent within the Economic Miracle, Zed Books Ltd, London.
54.
OlsonM. (1965) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass.
55.
PCIRR (1998) Review of the Industrial Relations Reform, the PCIRR, Seoul (in Korean).
56.
RowleyC.BaeJ. (2004) ‘HRM in South Korea’, in BudhwarP. S. (ed), Managing Human Resources in Asia-Pacific, Routledge, London.
57.
RynhartG. (2004) ‘International Employers' Organizations', in BlanpainR. (ed), Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations in Industrialized Market Economies, Kluwer Law International, the Hague, 8th edn, pp.509–548.
58.
SchmitterR.C.StreeckW. (1999) The Organization of Business Interests: Studying the Associative Action of Business in Advanced Industrial Societies, MPIfG Discussion Paper 99/1, Max-Planck-Insitut fur Gesellschaftsforschung, Cologne.
59.
Seoul Economic Daily, 1998–2003 (in Korean).
60.
SheldonP.ThornthwaiteL. (1999a) (eds) Employer associations and industrial relations change: catalysts or captives?Allen & Unwin, Sydney.
61.
SheldonP.ThornthwaiteL. (1999b) ‘Swedish engineering employers: The search for industrial peace in the absence of centralized collective bargaining’, Industrial Relations Journal, 30(5): 514–532.
62.
SheldonPThornthwaiteL. (2004) ‘Business or Association? The Strategic Response of Employer Associations to the Decentralisation of Bargaining in Australia’, Economic and Labour Relations Review, 15(1): 128–58.
63.
SissonK. (1987) The management of collective bargaining: An international comparison, Blackwell, Oxford.
64.
SongW.G.LeeS.H. (2005) The Business Structure of Korean Chaebols and Concentration of Economic Power, Nanam, Seoul (in Korean).
65.
StreeckW. (1987) ‘The Uncertainties of Management in the Management of Uncertainty: Employers, Labor Relations and Industrial Adjustment in the 1980s', Work, Employment & Society, 1(3): 281–308.
66.
ThelenK. (1994) ‘Beyond corporatism: Toward a new framework for the study of labor in advanced capitalism’, Comparative Politics, 27(1): 107–24.
67.
TollidayS.ZeitlinJ. (1991a) ‘Introduction: Employers and industrial relations between theory and history’, in TollidayS.ZeitlinJ. (eds), The Power to Manage? Employers and industrial relations in comparative-historical perspective, Routledge, London, pp. 1–31.
68.
TollidayS.ZeitlinJ. (1991b) ‘Conclusion: National models and international variations in labour management and employer organisation’, in TollidayS.ZeitlinJ. (eds), The Power to Manage? Employers and industrial relations in comparative-historical perspective, Routledge, London, pp. 273–343.
69.
TraxlerF. (1993) ‘Business associations and Labor Unions in Comparison: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Findings on Social Class, Collective Action and Associational Organisability’, The British Journal of Sociology, 44(4): 673–691.
70.
TraxlerF. (2000) ‘Employers and employer organizations in Europe: Membership strength, density and representativeness', Industrial Relations Journal, 31(4): 308–316.
71.
TraxlerF. (2003a) ‘Bargaining (De)centralization, Macroeconomic Performance and Control over the Employment Relationship’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 41(1): 1–27.
72.
TraxlerF. (2003b) Economic change and its impact on employers' associations: A Crossnational Comparison: IIRA, 13th World Congress, Track 4.
73.
VattaA. (1999) ‘Employers' Organizations and Concertation: Internal Dynamics and Institutional Influence’, European Journal of Industrial Relations, 5(3): 245–64.
74.
WindmullerJ.P.GladstoneA. (1984) Employers associations and industrial relations: a comparative study, Clarendon, PressNew York.
75.
YooB. (2004) ‘Social Accord’, in LeeW.D. (ed), Labour in Korea, the Korea Labour Institute, Seoul.
76.
YoonN.S. (2005) (Former full-time executive vice-chairman, KEF), Interviewed 18 April (in Korean).
