Just over 20 years ago, Fred Gruen (1982) reviewed debates about the level of welfare expenditure in Australia, noting them as being motivated on the one hand by the view that ‘more is better’, and on the other hand by the view that ‘too much’ is dangerous. Despite Gruen's debunking of many assertions about the Australian welfare state, the debate continues, with arguments on the one hand, that Australian welfare state spending is ‘mean’ compared to other countries, and on the other hand, that Australia has a significant problem of welfare dependency and increasing welfare spending. This paper presents the results of recent OECD studies that provide the most-up-to-date comparative information on the relative performance of Australian welfare arrangements. The paper looks at: (i) the trends in the level of social expenditure in Australia compared to other OECD countries, and explanations for differences across countries; (ii) the level of benefit receipt among people of working age; (iii) the impact of social expenditure on income distribution; and (iv) the relative generosity of benefits and implications for incentives. The paper concludes with a discussion of the policy conclusions that might be drawn from these comparisons.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AaronH. (1992) The Economics and Politics of Pensions: Evaluating the Choices', in Private Pensions and Public Policy, OECD, Paris.
2.
ÅbergR. (1989) ‘Distributive Mechanisms of the Welfare State -A Formal Analysis and an Empirical Application’, European Sociological Review, No. 5:167–82.
3.
Australian Council of Social Service (2004) Australia's social security system: International comparisons of welfare payments, ACOSS Info 360, August, Sydney.
4.
Australian Insitute of Health and Welfare (2005) Australia's Welfare 2005, AIHW, Canberra.
5.
AdemaW. (2001) Net Social Expenditure, Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Paper 52, OECD, Paris.
6.
AdemaW.EinerhandM.EklindB.LotzJ.PearsonM. (1996) Net Public Social Expenditure, Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Paper, No. 19, OECD, Paris.
7.
AdemaW.LadaiqueM. (2005) Net Social Expenditure, Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Paper, forthcoming, OECD, Paris.
BarrN. (1992) ‘Economic Theory and the Welfare State: A Survey and Reinterpretation’, Journal of Economic Literature, 30: 741–803.
10.
BarrN. (1999) ‘Fundamentals of social security analysis', Australian Social Policy, 1999/1: 7–29.
11.
BarrN. (2001) The Welfare State as Piggy Bank: Information, Risk, Uncertainty, and the Role of the State, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
12.
BremnerK. (2005) ‘Net tax thresholds for Australian families', Economic Roundup, Winter, Department of the Treasury, Canberra.[Online] Available: http://www.Treasury.gov.au.
13.
CastlesF.G. (1992) ‘On Sickness Days and Social Policy’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 28: 29–44.
14.
FörsterM.D'ErcoleM. Mira (2005) ‘Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries in the Second Half of the 1990s', OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Paper No. 22, OECD, Paris.
15.
GruenF.H. (1982) ‘The Welfare Expenditure Debate: Economic Myths of the Left and the Right’, Economic Record, 58(162): 207–223.
16.
InglesD. (1977) ‘International Comparisons of Social Security Expenditure’, Social Security Quarterly, 5(1): 1–6.
17.
KorpiW.PalmeJ. (1998) ‘The Paradox of Redistribution and the Strategy of Equality: Welfare State Institutions, Inequality and Poverty in the Western Countries.’, American Sociological Review, 63(5): 661–87.
18.
LindertP.H. (2005) Growing Public: Is the Welfare State Mortal or Exportable?American University of Paris, Working Paper No. 25, Paris.
19.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (1976) Public Expenditure on Income Maintenance Programmes, OECD, Paris.
20.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (1981) The Welfare State in Crisis, OECD, Paris.
21.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (1985) Social Expenditure 1960–1990: Problems of growth and control, OECD, Paris.
22.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (1996) Social Expenditure Statistics of OECD Members Countries, Provisional Version, Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers No. 17, OECD, Paris.
23.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (1998) Income Distribution and Poverty in Selected OECD Counties, Economics Department Working Paper No. 189, OECD, Paris.
24.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2003) Employment Outlook, June, OECD, Paris.
25.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2004) Benefits and Wages: OECD Indicators, OECD, Paris.
26.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2005, forthcoming, Reconciling Earning and Caring: Social Policies for Working Families, OECD, Paris.
27.
SaundersP. (2004a) Only 18%? Why ACOSS Is Wrong To Be Complacent About Welfare Dependency, Issue Analysis No. 51, September, Centre for Independent Studies, Sydney.
28.
SaundersP. (2004b) Australia's Welfare Habit: and how to kick it, Duffy and Snellgrove and Centre for Independent Studies, Sydney.
29.
SaundersP. (2005a) The $85 Billion Tax/Welfare Churn, Issue Analysis No. 57, April, Centre for Independent Studies, Sydney.
30.
SaundersP. (2005b) Six Arguments in Favour of Self-Funding, Issue Analysis No. 61, July, Centre for Independent Studies, Sydney.
31.
SchuknechtL.TanziV. (2005) Reforming Public Expenditure In Industrialised Countries: Are There Trade-Offs?European Central Bank, Working Paper No. 435.
32.
SchutJ.M.VroomanJ.C.de BeerP.T. (2001) On Worlds of Welfare, Social and Cultural Planning Office of the Netherlands, The Hague.
33.
VarleyR. (1986) The Government Household Transfer Database, 1960–1984, Department of Economics and Statistics, Working Paper No. 36, OECD, Paris.
34.
VromanW.BrusentsevV. (2005) Unemployment Compensation throughout the World: A Comparative Analysis, W.E Upjohn Institute, Kalamazoo.
35.
WarbyM.NahanM. (1998) From Workfare State to Transfer State: Where We Were and Why We Changed, IPA Backgrounder, Volume 10, No 3. Institute of Public Affairs, Melbourne.
36.
WhitefordP. (1995) ‘The Use of Replacement Rates in International Comparisons of Benefit Systems', International Social Security Review, 48(2): 3–30.
37.
WhitefordP. (1997) ‘Targeting Welfare: A Comment’, Economic Record, 73(220): 45–50.
38.
WhitefordP. (1998) ‘Is Australia Particularly Unequal?’ in SmythP.CassB. (eds), Contesting the Australian Way: States, Markets and Civil Society, Cambridge University Press, Melbourne.
