The Work Choices package of legislative reforms has significantly altered both the institutions and the instruments of the federal regulatory architecture for setting minimum working conditions. This paper surveys the reduced role of awards and of the Australian Industrial Relations Commission, before considering the function and content of the Australian Fair Pay and Conditions Standard and Australian Pay and Classification Scales, as well as the role of the newly created Australian Fair Pay Commission. It argues that the Work Choices reforms have shifted power over the setting of minimum working conditions to the government, which will set many conditions directly, and to employers, who will be entitled to require employees to be party to workplace agreements that displace very many of the minimum working conditions that are otherwise purportedly guaranteed. These shifts have opened up the space for significant reductions in minimum working conditions, as well as for falls in real wages for those not able to benefit from wage bargaining.
AlstonP. (2005) ‘“Core Labour Standards” and the Transformation of the International Labour Rights Regime’, European Journal of International Law, 15: 457–421.
3.
ArupC., HoweJ., MitchellR., O'DonnellA. and ThamJ-C. (2000) ‘Employment Protection and Employment Promotion: The Contested Terrain of Australian Labour Law’ In BiagiM. (Ed), Job Creation and Labour Law: From Protection Towards Pro-action, Kluwer Law International.
4.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2005) Employee Hours and Earnings, Australia, Cat. 6306.
5.
Centre for Employment and Labour Relations Law. (2005) Submission to Senate Employment, Workplace Relations and Education Legislation Committee, Inquiry into the Workplace Relations Amendment (Work Choices) Bill 2005, Submission No 96, [Online], Available: www.aph.gov.au/Senate/committee/eet_ctte/wr_workchoices05/index.htm) [accessed 9 November 2005].
6.
ChapmanA. (2006) ‘Unfair Dismissal Law and Work Choices: From Safety Net Standard to Legal Privilege’, Economic and Labour Relations Review, 16(forthcoming).
7.
CreightonW.StewartA. (2005) Labour Law, (4th Edn), Federation Press, Sydney.
8.
CreightonW. (1998) ‘The ILO and the Protection of Fundamental Human Rights in Australia’, Melbourne University Law Review, 22: 239–280.
9.
DabscheckB. (2001) ‘The Slow and Agonising Death of the Australian Experiment with Conciliation and Arbitration’, Journal of Industrial Relations, 43: 277–293.
10.
FenwickC. (2003) ‘Protecting Victoria's Vulnerable Workers: New Legislative Developments’, Australian Journal of Labour Law, 16: 198–213.
11.
Forbes-MewettH.GriffinG.McKenzieD. (2003) ‘The Australian Industrial Relations Commission: Adapting or Dying?’, International Journal of Employment Studies, 11(2): 1–23.
12.
Forbes-MewettH.GriffinG.McKenzieD. (2005) ‘The Role and Usage of Conciliation and Arbitration in Dispute Resolution in the Australian Industrial Relations Commission’, Australian Bulletin of Labour, 31: 171–190.
13.
FordW. (2005) ‘Politics, the Constitution and Australian Industrial Relations: Pursuing a Unified National System’, The Australian Economic Review, 38(2): 211–222.
14.
GrayA. (2005) ‘Precedent and Policy: Australian Industrial Relations Reform in the 21st Century Using the Corporations Power’, Deakin Law Review, 10: 440–459.
15.
HancockK. and RichardsonS. (2004) ‘Economic and Social Effects,’ in IsaacJ. and MacIntyreS. (Eds), The New Province for Law and Order: 100 Years of Conciliation and Arbitration, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
16.
HoweJ. (2001) ‘The Job Creation Function of the State: A New Subject for Labour Law’, Australian Journal of Labour Law, 14: 242–268.
17.
HoweJ.MitchellR.MurrayJ.O'DonnellA.PatmoreG. (2005) ‘The coalition's proposed industrial relations changes: an interim assessment’, Australian Bulletin of Labour, 31(3): 189–209.
18.
JessupC. (2002) ‘The Onus of Proof in Proceedings under Part XA of the Workplace Relations Act 1996’, Australian Journal of Labour Law, 15: 198–208.
19.
KingJ.StilwellF. (2006) ‘The Industrial Relations “Reforms”: An Introduction’, Journal of Australian Political Economy, 56:5–12.
20.
KollmorgenS. (1997) ‘Towards A Unitary National System of Industrial Relations’, Australian Journal of Labour Law, 10:158–169.
21.
MayR. (2006) ‘The British Low Pay Commission and the Proposed Australian Fair Pay Commission’, Journal of Australian Political Economy, 56: 92–104.
22.
McCallumR. (2006) ‘The New Work Choices Laws: Once Again Australia Borrows Foreign Labour Law Concepts’, Australian Journal of Labour Law, 19 (forthcoming).
23.
McCallumR. (2005) ‘Plunder Downunder: Transplanting the Anglo-American Labor Law Model to Australia’, Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, 26: 381–399.
24.
MitchellR. (2005) ‘Looking Back on a Century of Conciliation and Arbitration’, Australian Journal of Labour Law, 18: 193–195.
25.
MitchellR.CampbellR.BarnesA.BicknellE.CreightonK.FetterJ.KormanS. (2005) ‘What's Going on With the No Disadvantage Test?: An Analysis of Outcomes and Processes under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth), Working Paper No 33, Centre for Employment and Labour Relations Law, University of Melbourne.
26.
MitchellR.NaughtonR. (1993) ‘Australian Compulsory Arbitration: Will It Survive into the Twenty-First Century?’Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 31: 265–295.
27.
MerloO. (2000) ‘Flexibilities and Stretching Rights: The No-Disadvantage Test in Enterprise Bargaining’, Australian Journal of Labour Law, 13: 207–235.
28.
MurrayJ. (2005) ‘The AIRC's Test Case on Work and Family Provisions: The End of Dynamic Regulatory Change at the Federal Level?’Australian Journal of Labour Law, 18: 325–343.
29.
MurrayJ. (2005a) Submission to Senate Employment, Workplace Relations and Education Legislation Committee, Inquiry into the Workplace Relations Amendment (Work Choices) Bill 2005, Submission No 65, [Online], Available: www.aph.gov.au/Senate/committee/eet_ctte/wr_workchoices05/index.html [accessed 9 November 2005]
30.
NaughtonR. (1997) ‘Sailing into Uncharted Seas: The Role of Unions Under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth)’, Australian Journal of Labour Law, 10: 112–132.
31.
OwensR. (2002) ‘Decent Work for the Contingent Workforce in the New Economy’, Australian Journal of Labour Law, 15: 209–234.
32.
PeetzD. (1998) ‘The Safety Net, Bargaining and The Role of the Australian Industrial Relations Commission’, Journal of Industrial Relations, 40: 532–553.
33.
PittardM. (2006) ‘Back to the Future: Termination of Employment Under the Work Choices Legislation’, Australian Journal of Labour Law, 19 (forthcoming).
34.
PlowmanD.PrestonA. (2006) ‘The New Industrial Relations: Portents for the Low Paid’, Journal of Australian Political Economy, 56: 224–242.
35.
PocockB.Masterman-SmithH. (2006) ‘WorkChoices and Women Workers’, Journal of Australian Political Economy, 56: 126–144.
36.
RaffinL. (2005) ‘Baby Steps in The Right Direction? Does the New Maternity Payment Realise the Aims of Paid Maternity Leave?’, Australian Journal of Labour Law, 18: 270–291.
37.
RiderC. (2005) ‘Using Tax and Social Security to Reconstruct the Part-Time Labour Market: A Note on “Welfare to Work’”, Australian Journal of Labour Law, 18: 302–312.
38.
SmithB. (2003) ‘A Time to Value: Proposal for a National Paid Maternity Leave Scheme’, Australian Journal of Labour Law, 16: 226–233.
39.
SmithB. (2002) ‘Maternity Leave: Still Unpaid and Still Uncertain’, Australian Journal of Labour Law, 15: 291–297.
40.
StewartA. (2005) The Work Choices Legislation: An Overview, Supplement to Creighton and Stewart (2005), Available: www.federationpress.com.au.
41.
StewartA. (2001) Federal Labour Law and New Uses for the Corporations Power’, Australian Journal of Labour Law, 14: 145–168.
42.
Victorian Industrial Relations Taskforce. (2000) Independent Report of the Victorian Industrial Relations Taskforce.
43.
WaringP.LewerJ. (2001) ‘The No Disadvantage Test: Failing Workers’, Labour and Industry12(1): 65–86.
44.
WilliamsG. (2005) ‘The Constitution and a National Industrial Relations Regime’, Deakin Law Review, 10: 489–510.
45.
WoodenM. (2006) ‘Minimum Wage Setting and the Australian Fair Pay Commission,’
