This paper examines the experience of the Hyundai Motor Company (HMC) managing its employees in a new plant established in Chennai, India. The establishment of the Indian plant in 1998 marked an important attempt by HMC to ‘relaunch’ its globalisation strategy after an earlier failure to manufacture in Canada. The ability of HMC to adopt an appropriate employment relations strategy in India will be an important factor determining its success as a global manufacturer. A key issue facing the Hyundai Motor Company of India (HMI) is the role to be accorded to unions and employee representation in the plant.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmsdenA. (1989) Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialisation, Oxford University Press, New York.
2.
BaeK.H. (1987) Automobile Workers in Korea, Seoul National University Press, Seoul.
3.
BhaktavatsalaR.C. (1992) ‘The Indian automobile industry: patterns of expansion, entry and performance’, Management Journal, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 97–111.
4.
ChoH.J. (1999) ‘The employment adjustment of Hyundai Motor Company: a research focus on corporate-level labor relations’, Korean Journal of Labor Studies, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 63–96 (in Korean).
5.
ChoiJ. (1989) Labor and the Authoritarian State: Labor Unions in South Korean Manufacturing Industries, Korea University Press, Seoul.
6.
HillR.C. and LeeY.C. (1989) ‘Japanese multinationals in East Asian development: the case of the auto industry’ in SklairL. (Ed) Capitalism and Development, Routledge, Lonon.
7.
International Labour Organisation (1992) The World Labour Report, ILO, Geneva.
8.
JanelliR.YimD. (1993) Making Capitalism: the Social and Cultural Construction of a Korean Conglomerate, Stanford University Press, Palo Alto.
9.
KearneyR.P. (1991) Warrior Worker: History and Challenge of South Korea's Economic Miracle, Henry Holt & Coy, New York.
10.
KochanT.A.LansburyR.D.MacDuffieJ.P. (1997) After Lean Production: Evolving Employment Relations in the World Auto Industry, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.
11.
KwonS.H.O'DonnellM. (1999) ‘Repression and struggle: the State, the Chaebol and the independent trade unions in South Korea’, Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 272–293.
12.
KwonS.H.O'DonnellM. (2001) The Chaebol and Labour in Korea, Routledge, Lonon.
13.
LeeC.S. (2002) ‘Law and labour-management relations in South Korea: advancing industrial democratisation’ in CooneyS., LindseyT., MitchellR. and ZhuY. (Eds) Law and Labour Market Regulation in East Asia, Routledge, London, pp. 215–245.
14.
OgleG.E. (1990) South Korea: Dissent within the Economic Miracle, Zed Books, Lonon.
15.
RamaswamyE.A. (1988) Worker Consciousness and Trade Union Response, Oxford University Press, New Delhi.
16.
SteersR.M.ShinY.K.UngsonR. (1989) The Chaebol: Korea's New Industrial Relations Might, Harper & Raw, New York.
17.
TealG. (1995) ‘Korean management, corporate culture and systems of labour control between South Korea and North America’, Culture, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 85–103.
18.
Venkata RatnamC.S. (1995) ‘Economic liberalisation and the transformation of industrial relations policies in India’ in VermaA., KochanT.A., and LansburyR.D. (Eds) Employment Relations in the Growing Asian Economies, Routledge, London, pp. 248–314.
