Organizations and governments have improved their environmental data collection and reporting performance since 1992, but it is still limited and focussed on specific problem solving rather than providing a national accounting framework for addressing environmental problems. In Australia evidence of the consideration of ‘sustainability’ goals in data collection and disclosure is growing through the development of ‘state of the environment’ reporting. The development of integrated environmental, economic and social information to support the application of more radical environmental modernisation ideas by organizations and governments is weak. Private and public sector organization reporting has improved, but there are still insufficient incentives to enhance it. This paper suggests more systematic reporting at the aggregate level by governments is essential if the environment is to be managed in a regular, balanced, sustainable and responsible way.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderJHigginsJWhiteT (1998) Environmental Indicators: Local and Community Uses, Environment Australia, Canberra.
2.
Australia and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council Task Force (2000a) National Headline Sustainability Indicators, Conference Discussion Paper, Environment Australia, Canberra at www.ea.gov.au/soe/envindicators/pubs/coreindicators accessed 13 October 2001.
3.
Australia and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council (2000b) Core Environmental Indicators for Reporting on the State of the Environment, ANZECC, Canberra, March.
4.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Cat. 4605.0 (1997a) Australian Transport and the Environment.
5.
ABS (1997b) Yearbook of Australia, ‘Natural Resources in National Balance Sheets’, ABS, Canberra.
ABS Cat 5249.0 (2002b) Australia's National Accounts: Tourism Satellite Account.
12.
ABS (2002c) Environment: Environmental Attitudes and Behaviour in Australian Households, ABS Canberra. Viewed at www.abs.qov.au/ausstats/ on 29 April 2002.
13.
Australian State of the Environment Committee (2001) State of the Environment: 2001, Environment Australia/CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood (released 2002).
14.
BeckU (1996) ‘Risk Society and the Provident State’ in LaschS (eds) Risk, Environment and Modernity, Sage, Lonon.
15.
BulkeleyH (2001) ‘No Regrets? Economy and Environment in Australia's Climate Change Policy Process’, Global Environmental Change, Vol. 11, No. 2, July.
16.
Commonwealth Environmental Protection Agency (now Environment Australia). (1992) Development of National State Environmental Reporting, CEPA, Canberra, December.
17.
DeeganC (1996) ‘Environmental reporting for Australian Corporations: An Analysis of Contemporary Australian and Overseas Environmental Reporting Practices’, Environmental and Planning Law Journal, April.
18.
DenisovNChristoffersenL. (2001) ‘Impact of Environmental Information on Decision Making Processes and the Environment’, UNEP/GRID-Arendal Occasional Paper No. 1.
EstyD (2001) ‘Bridging the Trade — Environment Divide’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 15, No. 3, Summer.
21.
GrayRBebbingtonJWaltersD (1993) Accounting for the Environment, Markus Weiner Publishers, Princeton.
22.
GrayROwenD.AdamsC., (1996) Accounting and Accountability: Changes and Challenges in Corporate Social Environmental Reporting, Prentice Hall, Lonon.
23.
HelmD (Ed) (2000) Environmental Policy: Objectives, Instruments, and Implementation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
24.
HollandeRCurranG (2001) ‘The Greening of Grey: National Competition Policy and the Environment’, Australian Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 60, No. 3, September
25.
JohnsonM (1991) ‘Regulating the Environment’ in HeadB & McCoyE (Eds). Deregulation or Better Regulation, Macmillan, Melbourne.
26.
JohnsonM. and RixS (eds) (1993) Water in Australia: Managing Economic, Environmental and Community Reform, Pluto Press, Sydney.
27.
JohnsonM (1995) ‘Infrastructure and Australia's Economic and Social Development Through the 1990's: Assessing the Problem and the Priorities’ in EPAC Private Infrastructure Task Force, Interim Report: Commissioned Studies, AGPS, Canberra.
28.
JohnsonM (2000) ‘Balancing Sustainability, Efficiency and Equity: An Economic Perspective’ in DobbinsonK (Ed) Sustainable Transport in Sustainable Cities: Project 1: Technical Papers, Warren Centre, University of Sydney, May.
29.
JohnsonM (2001) ‘The Impact of New Public Management on the Reform of Transportation Infrastructure in Sydney’ in JonesL, GuthrieJ, and SteaneP (Eds), Learning From Public Management Reform: Research in Public Policy Analysis and Management, JAI: Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
30.
Natural Heritage Trust (2000) Public Environmental Reporting: An Australian Approach, Environment Australia, Canberra, March.
31.
New South Wales Council on the Cost of Government (1999) Environmental Reporting in NSW, NSWCCG, Sydney.
32.
NewtonP (1998) Environmental Indicators for National state of the Environment Reporting: Human Settlements, Environment Australia, Canberra.
33.
OECD (1995) Environmental Accounting for Decision-Making, OECD Environmental Monographs, No 113, OECD, Paris.
34.
OECD (2001) OECD Environmental Strategy for the First Decade of the 21st Century, OECD, Paris. 16th May.
35.
Public Accounts Estimates Committee (1998) Environmental Accounting and Reporting, Issues Paper No 5, Parliament of Victoria, Melbourne.
36.
United Nations Environmental Program (1999) Global Environmental Outlook 2000, UNEP, Nairobi.
37.
UNEP (1992) Agenda 21, UNEP, Nairobi.
38.
World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
