In this paper, it is argued that the benefits of competitive tendering and contracting have been overestimated, and that many of the apparent benefits actually reflect transfers rather than efficiency gains. Moreover, if arrangements for competitive tendering and contracting yield an inappropriate allocation of risk, such policies can reduce welfare rather than enhancing it as is commonly claimed. A number of case studies are presented to illustrate the latter proposition. Finally, some recommendations are presented for improvements in policy with respect to competitive tendering and contracting.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AscherK. (1987) The Politics of Privatisation: Contracting Out Public Services, Macmillan Education, Basingstoke.
2.
Australian National Audit Office (1995) The Sale of CSL, AGPS, Canberra, The Auditor-General. Audit Report No. 14, 1995–96.
3.
ClarkC.M.H. (1962) A History of Australia: From the Earliest Times to the Age of Macquarie, Melbourne University Press, Melbourne.
4.
Commonwealth of Australia (1945) Full Employment in Australia, Commonwealth Government Printer, Canberra.
5.
Commonwealth of Australia (2001) Report of Enquiry Arising from Senate Estimates Hearings on 4–5 June 2001 into Matters Concerning Job Network, AGPS, Canberra.
6.
Department of Employment Workplace Relations and Small Business (2001) Job Network Evaluation, Stage two: Progress Report, AGPS, Canberra.
7.
DombergerS.DoyleG.HallC. (1996) Competitive tendering and contracting: a response to the critics, CT02-96 April, CTC Research Team, Graduate School of Business, University of Sydney.
8.
DombergerS.HallC.LiE.A.L. (1995) ‘The determinants of price and quality in competitively tendered contracts’, Economic Journal105 (433), 1454–70.
9.
DombergerS.MeadowcroftS.ThompsonD. (1986) ‘Competitive tendering and efficiency: The case of refuse collection’, Fiscal Studies7 (4), 69–87.
10.
DombergerS.MeadowcroftS.ThompsonD. (1987) ‘The impact of competitive tendering on the costs of hospital domestic services’, Fiscal Studies8 (4), 39–54.
11.
DombergerS.MeadowcroftS.ThompsonD. (1988) ‘Competition and efficiency in refuse collection: a reply’, Fiscal Studies9 (1), 86–9.
12.
Economic Planning Advisory Commission Private Infrastructure Task Force (1995), Final Report, AGPS, Canberra.
13.
EganJ.T.MontesinH.J.AdenaM.A. (1995) NSW Teachers Federation School Cleaning Services Survey 1994, February, INSTAT Statistical Data Analysts (INSTAT Australia Pty Ltd).
14.
Evatt Research Centre (1990) Breach of Contract: Privatisation and the Management of Australian Local Government, Pluto Press, Sydney.
15.
FraserL. (1997) Impact of contracting out on female NESB workers: case study of the NSW government cleaning service, Ethnic Communities' Council of NSW Inc.
16.
FraserL.QuigginJ. (1999) ‘Competitive tendering and service quality’, Just Policy17, 53–7.
17.
GanleyJ.GrahlJ. (1988) ‘Competition and efficiency in refuse collection: a critical comment’, Fiscal Studies9 (1), 80–5.
18.
HamiltonC.QuigginJ. (1997) The privatisation of CSL, Australia Institute Report No. 4, Canberra.
19.
HartleyK. (1997) Independent Audit of the Bolivar Wastewater Treatment Plant to Determine the Causes of a Major Odour Event, Uniquest Limited, St Lucia.
20.
Humphry and Richard (2000) Review of the Whole of Government Information Technology Outsourcing Initiative, Commonwealth of Australia.
21.
Industry Commission (1996) Competitive Tendering and Contracting by Public Sector Agencies, AGPS, Melbourne.
22.
GrantS.QuigginJ. (2002) ‘The equity premium and the discount rate for public projects’, Economics, forthcoming.
23.
JohnsG. (2001) ‘Confessions of a Privatizer: The Privatization of CSL Ltd’, Institute of Public Affairs, Privatisation Briefing, May.
24.
National Commission of Audit (1996) Report to the Commonwealth Government, AGPS, Canberra.
25.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2001) Innovations in Labour Market Policies: the Australian Way, OECD, Paris.
26.
PaddonM. (1991) The real costs of contracting out: reassessing the Australian debate from UK experience, Discussion Paper No. 21, Public Sector Research Centre, University of NSW, Sydney.
27.
PaddonM. (1993) Competitive tendering and contracting out in British local government, 1979–92, Discussion Paper No. 30, Public Sector Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney.
28.
RimmerS.J. (1993) Aspects of competitive tendering and contracting in local government administration (PhD thesis), April, University of New England.
29.
SavasE. (1977) ‘An empirical study of competition in municipal service delivery’, Public Administration Review Nov/Dec, 717–24.
30.
Senate Committee on Finance and Public Administration (2001) Re-booting the IT agenda in the Australian Public Service — Final report on the Government's information technology outsourcing initiative, Parliament of Australia, Canberra.
31.
SheilC. (2000) Water's Fall: Running the Risks With Economic Rationalism, Pluto Press, Sydney.
32.
TanziV. (1982) The Underground Economy in the United States and Abroad, Blackwell, Oxford.
33.
WalkerB.WalkerB.C. (2000) Privatisation: Sell Off or Sell Out? The Australian Experience, ABC Books, Sydney.
