Several articles have debated the differences between critical and traditional accounting history, generally concluding with a call for reconciliation. This article argues that this debate has been lost, and critical history has claimed the field. After reviews of historiography that dispute the foundations of accounting critical history research, the article discusses the very real consequences of this defeat: that actual history research has become irrelevant to accounting research. On a hopeful note, a review of several recent historiographic articles in accounting journals suggests that this point is gaining currency, although it has yet to permeate most mainstream journals.
AbbottA (1988) The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
ApplebyJHuntLJacobM (1994) Telling the Truth About History. New York: W. W. Norton and Co.
3.
BakerCPerssonM (2022) Historical Developments in the Accountancy Profession, Financial Reporting, and Accounting Theory. United Kingdom: Emerald Publishing.
4.
BallRBrownP (2014) Ball and Brown (1968): A retrospective. The Accounting Review89(1): 1–26.
5.
BellahR (1959) Durkheim and history. The American Sociological Review24(4): 447–461.
6.
BuddA (2009) The Modern Historiography Reader: Western Sources. London: Routledge.
7.
CarnegieGMcBrideKNapierC, et al. (2020) Accounting history and theorizing about organizations. The British Accounting Review52(6): 100932.
CorderyCGomesDLeoniG, et al. (2023) Innovation in accounting historiography: Where to from here?Accounting History28(3): 368–389.
10.
FleischmanRRadcliffeVShoemakerP (2003) Doing Accounting History: Contributions to the Development of Accounting Thought. Amsterdam: JAI Press.
11.
FleishmanRRadcliffeV (2005) The roaring nineties: Accounting history comes of age. Accounting Historians Journal32(1): 61–109.
12.
FoucaultM (1972) The Archeology of Knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.
13.
GayP (1985) The Bourgeois Experience: Victoria to Freud. Volume I: Education of the Senses. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
14.
GendronYBakerC (2005) On interdisciplinarity movements: The development of a network of support around Foucauldian perspectives in accounting research. European Accounting Review14: 525–569.
15.
GinzburgC (1980) The Cheese and the Worms: The Cosmos of a Sixteenth-Century Miller. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
16.
GuthrieJParkerL (2017) Reflections and projections: 30 years of the interdisciplinary accounting, auditing and accountability search for a fairer society. Accounting, Auditing, & Accountability Journal20(1): 2–17.
17.
HimmelfarbG (1987) The New History and the Old: Critical Essays and Reappraisals. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
18.
HobsbawmE (1997) On History. New York: The New Press.
19.
HoskinKMacveR (1988) The genesis of accountability: The West Point connections. Accounting, Organizations and Society13(1): 37–73.
20.
IggersG (2005) Historiography in the Twentieth Century: From Scientific Objectivity to the Postmodern Challenge. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.
21.
JenkinsK (1997) The Postmodern History Reader. London: Routledge.
22.
KentC (1986) Foucault: Doing history of undoing it?Canadian Journal of History21(3): 371–395.
23.
LearyD (1976) Michel Foucault, an historian of the sciences humaines. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences12(3): 286–293.
24.
LukkaKModellSVannariE (2022) Exploring the ‘theory is king’ thesis in accounting research: The case of actor-network theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal35(9): 136–167.
25.
MazaS (2017) Thinking About History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
MegillA (1979) Foucault, structuralism, and the ends of history. The Journal of Modern History51(3): 451–503.
27.
MerinoBMayperA (2001) Securities legislation and the accounting profession in the 1930s: The rhetoric and reality of the American dream. Critical Perspectives on Accounting12: 501–525.
28.
MidelfortE (1980) Madness and civilization in early modern Europe: A reappraisal of Michel Foucault. In: MalamentB (ed) After the Reformation: Essays in Honor of J. H. Hexter. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 247–265.
29.
NapierC (2006) Accounts of change: 30 years of historical accounting research. Accounting, Organizations and Society31: 445–507.
30.
NapierC (2020) Historiography. In: EdwardsJRWalkerSP (eds) The Routledge Companion to Accounting History, 2nd ed. Oxfordshire, UK: Taylor and Francis Group, 32–53.
31.
OldroydD (1999) Historiography, causality, and positioning: An unsystematic view of accounting history. The Accounting Historians Journal26(1): 83–102.
32.
OldroydD (2021) In memory of Dick Fleischman. The Accounting History Review31(1): 125–127.
33.
PicardCDurocherSGendronY (2014) From meticulous professionals to superheroes of the business world: A historical portrait of a cultural change in the field of accountancy. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal27(1): 73–118.
34.
PorterR (1990) Foucault’s great confinement. History of the Human Sciences3(1): 47–54.
35.
RaffensoeSMennikenAMillerP (2019) The Foucault effect in organization studies. Organization Studies40(2): 155–182.
36.
SangsterA (2016) The genesis of double-entry bookkeeping. The Accounting Review91(1): 299–315.
37.
ScullA (1990) Michel Foucault’s history of madness. History of the Human Sciences3(1): 57–67.
38.
StarrP (1982) The Social Transformation of American Medicine: The Rise of a Sovereign Profession and the Making of a Vast Industry. New York: Basic Books.
39.
StoneL (1979) The revival of narrative: Reflections on a new old history. Past and Present85: 3–24.
40.
TuchmanB (1981) Practicing History: Selected Essays by Barbara W. Tuchman. New York: A. Knopf.
41.
TysonT (1993) Keeping the record straight: Foucauldian revisionism and US cost accounting history. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal6(2): 4–16.
42.
TysonTOldroydD (2007) Straw men and old saws – An evidence-based response to Sy & Tinker’s critique of accounting history. The Accounting Historians Journal34(1): 173–193.
43.
TysonTOldroydD (2017) The debate between postmodernism and historiography: An accounting historian’s manifesto. Accounting History22(1): 29–43.
44.
VasconcelosASangsterARodriguesL (2022) Avoiding Whig interpretations in historical research: An illustrative case study. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal35(6): 1402–1430.
45.
WalkerS (2020) Structures, territories, and tribes. In: EdwardsJRWalkerSP (eds) The Routledge Companion to Accounting History, 2nd ed. Oxfordshire, UK: Taylor and Francis Group, 11–31.
46.
WoodG (2008) The Purpose of the Past: Reflections on the Uses of History. New York: Penguin Press.
