Implementation of supra-national policies: lessons from the Nordic countries' experiences of European directives

Abstract

The article analyses the process of implementation of the Accounting Directives in the Nordic countries as a case study of supra-national regulation. The experiences in the Nordic countries are documented for an English-speaking readership based on the drafts of the legislation, commentaries by the implementing committees and interviews with individuals involved in the process. The article concludes that, in the current economic and political climate, the European Union has apparently drawn on the experience of implementing the original directives with its new model for regulating accounting change introduced with the IAS Regulation of 2002.

Keywords

accounting harmonization European directives international accounting standards Nordic countries supra-national regulation.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aisbitt, S. (2002), “ Harmonisation of Financial Reporting before the European Company Law Directives: The Case of the Nordic Companies Act ”, Accounting and Business Research, Vol.32, No.2, pp.105—17.

Aisbitt, S. and Nobes, C. (2001), “ The True and Fair View Requirement in Recent National Implementations ”, Accounting and Business Research , Vol.31, No.2, pp.83—90.

Alexander, D. (1996), “ Truer and Fairer: Uninvited Comments on Invited Comments ”, European Accounting Review, Vol.5, No.3, pp.483—93.

Alexander, D. and Christiansen, M. (1996), “The General Clause in Danish Accounting Regulation”, EAA Congress, Bergen, April 1996.

Alexander, D. and Schwencke, H.R. (2003), “ Accounting change in Norway ”, European Accounting Review, Vol.12, No.3, pp.549—66.

Allison, G. (1971), Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.

Brandsås, H. (1998), “ Ny Regnskapslov ”, Revisjon og Regnskap, No.5, pp.8—13.

Burrowes, A. and Nordström, J. (1999), “ An Alternate Approach in Implementing the 4th Directive: A Territorial Claim to Financial Reporting and Auditing in Sweden ”, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol.14, No.6, pp.302—7.

Capron, M. and Chiapello, E. (2005), “Les Transformations Institutionelles: l'Europe Recule,l'IASB s'impose”, in Capron, M. (ed.), Les Normes Comptables Internationales, Instruments du Capitalisme Financier, Paris: La Découverte, Ch.3.

10.

Christiansen, M. (1984), “ Danske Regnskabers Infromationsværdi efter Indførelsen af Årsregnskabsloven ”, Revision og Regnskabsvæsen , Vol.53, No.11, pp.472—87.

11.

Christiansen, M. (1995), “The History of Financial Reporting in Denmark ”, in Walton, P. (ed.) European Financial Reporting: A History, London: Academic Press, pp.55—73.

12.

Christiansen, M. (1999), ` Denmark ', in McLeay,S. (ed.), Accounting Regulation in Europe, Basingstoke and London: Macmillan , pp.49—77.

13.

Christiansen, P.M. and Sidenius, N.C. (1999), “Venner for Altid?: Samspillet Mellem Centraladministration og Interesseorganisationer”, in Blom-Hansen, C., J. and Daugbjerg, C. (eds.), Magtens Organisering: Stat og Interesseorganisationer i Danmark, Aarhus: Systime, pp.21—35.

14.

Colasse, B. (2005), “La Regulation Comptable entre Public et Privé”, in Capron, M. (ed.), Les Normes Comptables Internationales, Instruments du Capitalisme Financier , Paris: La Découverte , Ch.2.

15.

Cooper, D.J. , Puxty, T. , Robson, K. & Willmott, H. (1996), “ Changes in the International Regulation of Auditors: (In)stalling the Eighth Directive in the UK ”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol.7, No.6, pp.589—613.

16.

David, R. and Brierley, R. (1985), Major Legal Systems in the World Today: An Introduction to the Comparative Study of Law, 3rd edn, London: Stevens.

17.

Diggle, G. and Nobes, C.W. (1994), “ European Rule Making in Accounting: The Seventh Directive as a Case Study ”, Accounting and Business Research, Vol.24, No.96, pp.319—33.

18.

EC (1997), Interpretative Communication Concerning Certain Articles of the Fourth and Seventh Council Directives on Accounting, EC Commission, XV/7009/97 EN.

19.

EC (2000), EU Financial Reporting Strategy: The Way Forward, Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament.

20.

EC (2002), Regulation (EC) No. 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 July 2002 on the application of international accounting standards.

21.

EC (2004), Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Statutory Audit of Annual Accounts and Consolidated Accounts and Amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC, COM (2004) 177 final, COD 2004/0065

22.

Elling, J.O. (1994), “ Denmark ”, in J. Flower (ed.), The Regulation of Financial Reporting in the Nordic Countries, Stockholm: Publica, pp.33—64.

23.

Elling, J.O. and Hansen, C.K. (1984), “The Fourth Directive in Denmark”, in Gray, S.J. and Coenenberg, A. (eds.), EEC Accounting Harmonisation: Implementation and Impact of the Fourth Directive, Amsterdam and Oxford: North Holland, pp.29—41.

24.

Evans, L. and Nobes, C. (1998a), “ Harmonization of the Structure of Audit Firms: Incorporation in the UK and Germany ”, European Accounting Review, Vol.7, No.1, pp.125—48.

25.

Evans, L. and Nobes, C. (1998b), “ Harmonization Relating to Auditor Independence: The Eighth Directive, the UK and Germany ”, European Accounting Review, Vol.7, No.3, pp.493—516.

26.

Fagerstrøm, A. and Schwencke, H.R. (1994), “Why is Deferred Tax Treated Differently in Norwegian and Swedish Consolidated Accounts?”, Working Paper 1994/12, Sandvika: Norwegian School of Management .

27.

Hansen, C.K. and Sørensen, O. (2001), “ Denmark ”, in Alexander, D. and Archer, S. (eds.), European Accounting Guide, New York: Aspen Law & Business, pp.169—255.

28.

Heurlin, S. and Petersohn, E. (2001), “Sweden”, in Alexander, D. and Archer, S. (eds.), European Accounting Guide, New York: Aspen Law & Business, pp. 1202—57

29.

Hofstede, G. (1984), Culture's Consequences, abridged edn, London: Sage.

30.

Johnsen, A. and Eilifsen, A. (2001), “Norway”, in Alexander, D. and Archer, S. (eds.), European Accounting Guide, New York: Aspen Law & Business, pp.1294—341.

31.

Jönsson, S. (1984), “ Accounting Élite and Accounting Policy Making: The Swedish Case ”, Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies, August, pp.3—33.

32.

Kinserdal,A. (1995), “The History of Financial Reporting in Norway ”, in Walton, P. (ed.), European Financial Reporting: A History, London : Academic Press, pp.189—202.

33.

Kirchner, C. and Schmidt, M. (2005), “ IFRS and EU Accounting Regulation: Problems of Hybrid Standard Setting (HSS) ”, paper presented at the Workshop on Accounting in Europe, Regensburg, Germany, September 2005.

34.

Loft, A. and Jeppesen, K. (2001), “ Harmonising the Education and Qualification of Auditors?: Implementing the EU's Eighth Directive in Denmark ”, paper presented at the First European Auditing Research Network Symposium (EARNet), Germany, 26—7 October 2001.

35.

McLeay, S. , Ordelheide, D. and Young, S. (2000), “ Constituent Lobbying and its Impact on the Development of Financial Reporting Regulations: Evidence from Germany ”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol.25, No.1, pp.79—98.

36.

Majala, R. (1994), “Finland”, in Flower, J. (ed.), The Regulation of Financial Reporting in the Nordic Countries, Stockholm: Fritzes, pp.65—106.

37.

Näsi, S. and Virtanen, A. (2001), “Finland”, in Alexander, D. and Archer, S. (eds.), European Accounting Guide, New York: Aspen Law & Business, pp.256—302.

38.

Nobes, C. (1993), “ The True and Fair View Requirement: Impact on and of the Fourth Directive ”, Accounting and Business Research, Vol.24, No.93, pp.35—48.

39.

Nobes, C.W. and Schwencke, H.R. (2006), “ Modelling the Links between Tax and Financial Reporting: A Longitudinal Examination of Norway over 30 years up to IFRS adoption ”, European Accounting Review, Vol.15, No.1, pp.63—87.

40.

NOU (1995), Ny Regnskapslov , October.

41.

Ordelheide, D. (1996), “ True and Fair View: A European and German Perspective II ”, European Accounting Review, Vol.5, No.3, pp.495—506.

42.

Pirinen, P. (1996), The 1992 Reform of Finnish Accounting Legislation , Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä .

43.

Saario, M. (1959), The Expenditure-Revenue Theory in Accounting, Helsinki: Ottava.

44.

Schwencke, H.R. (1996), “ La Oss Beholde Forsiktighetsprinsippet! ”, Revisjon og regnskap, No.1, pp.12—5.

45.

Smith, M. (2003), Research Methods in Accounting, London: Sage.

46.

SOU (1994), Års- och koncernredovisning enligt EG-direktivet, February.

47.

Thorell, P. (1995), “ Perspektiv på den nya Årsredovisningslagen ”, Balans, No.11, pp.31—9.

48.

Tidström, G. (1995), “ Blir EU ett Hinder för Utvecklingen av Svensk Redovisning? ”, Balans, No.3, pp.4—7.

49.

Troberg, P.H. (1992), “ Recent Developments in Financial Reporting in Finland”, Advances in International Accounting, No.5, pp.24—45.

50.

Tyrrall, D. (2005), “ Accounting Standards: A Question of Proportional Representation ”, Financial Management, October, pp.28—9.

51.

Walton, P. (1992), “ Harmonisation of Accounting in France and Britain: Some Evidence ”, Abacus, Vol.28, No.2, pp.186—99.