Abstract
It has been asserted that the British Companies Act 1947 was part of the postwar response to a national emergency which created an ethos of greater social responsibility. The paper examines the validity of this contention. The 1947 Act is placed in the context of the debate which began in the 1920s about the role of accounting disclosure in corporate governance. From the 1920s onwards, there were calls for reform to improve accountability to investors, as well as a tenacious opposition to any reduction in the discretionary powers of directors. The British Labour Party made wider-ranging proposals for reform but these were dropped from its agenda in the 1930s. The paper concludes that the 1947 Act was not a product of Labour's programme of social legislation. Instead, it was a victory for the proponents of shareholder interests.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
