This study investigated an expert pianist's nine-month preparation for a public music performance (recital) through the collection of practice diaries and MIDI recordings of the eight scheduled pieces. Recordings were made under the experimentally varied conditions of solitary performance and public performance. The practice diaries revealed that the expert (an advanced student performer) allocated practice time consistently across the entire preparation period and tended to use mornings to practice the pieces perceived as being more difficult. Total preparation time for each of the pieces could be predicted on the basis of the pianist's subjective ratings of complexity and independent ratings of complexity given by other experts. An analysis of the performance data showed that, near the time of the recital, variability in performance tempo was large between pieces but very small for multiple renditions of the same piece, even under the different experimental conditions. Thus, to attain a highly reproducible public performance, the expert allocated practice time in response to task demands and engaged in specific preparations that would safeguard the performance against unexpected problems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ChaffinR.ImrehG. (1996). Effects of difficulty on expert practice: A case study of a concert pianist. Poster presented at the 4th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, McGill University, Montreal, Canada, August 11–15.
2.
ClynesM.WalkerJ. (1986). Music as time's measure. Music Perception, 4 (1), 85–120.
3.
EricssonK. A. (1997). Deliberate practice and the acquisition of expert performance: An overview. In JørgensenH.LehmannA. (eds.), Does practice make perfect? Current theory and research on instrumental music practice (pp. 9–52). Oslo, Norway: Norges musikkhøgskole.
4.
EricssonK. A.CharnessN. (1994). Expert performance. Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49, 725–747.
5.
EricssonK. A.LehmannA. C. (1996). Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 273–305.
6.
EricssonK. A.SmithJ. (1991). Prospects and limits in the empirical study of expertise: An introduction. In EricssonK. A.SmithJ. (eds.), Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (pp. 1–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
EricssonK. A.KrampeR. T.Tesch-RomerC. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406.
8.
GabrielssonA. (1987). Once again: The theme from Mozart's piano sonata in a major (K. 331). In GabrielssonA. (ed.), Action and perception in rhythm and music, (pp. 81–103). Stockholm, Sweden: Royal Swedish Academy of Music.
9.
GrusonL. M. (1988). Rehearsal skill and musical competence: does practice make perfect? In SlobodaJ. A. (ed.), Generative processes in music (pp. 91–112). Oxford, England: Clarendon.
10.
HarnischmacherC. (1993). Instrumentales Üben und Aspekte der Persönlichkeit. Eine Grundlagenstudie zur Erfassung physischer und psychischer Abweichungen durch InstrumentalspielFrankfurt, Germany: Lang.
11.
JonesA. R. (1990). The role of analytical prestudy in the memorization and retention of piano music with subjects of varied aural/kinesthetic ability. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51 (7), 2307A (UMI no. 9026216).
12.
KopiezR. (1996). Aspekte der Performanceforschung. In Motte-HaberH. (ed.), Handbuch der Musikpsychologie (pp. 505–587). Laaber, Germany: Laaber.
13.
KrampeR. T. (1994). Maintaining excellence: Cognitive-motor performance in pianists differing in age and skill levelStudien und Berichte/MPI für Bildungsforschung 58. Berlin, Germany: Sigma.
14.
LehmannA. C.EricssonK. A. (1996). Structure and acquisition of expert accompanying and sight-reading performance. Psychomusicology, 15, 1–29.
15.
LehmannA. C.EricssonK. A. (1993). Sight-reading ability of expert pianists in the context of piano accompanying. Psychomusicology, 12 (2), 182–195.
16.
MarcusA. (1979). Great pianists speak. Neptune, NJ: Paganiniana Publications.
17.
MiklaszewskiK. (1989). A case study of a pianist preparing a musical performance.
18.
Psychology of Music, 18, 112–139.
19.
MiklaszewskiK. (1995). Individual differences in preparing a musical composition for public performance. In ManturzewskaM.MiklaszewskiK.BiatkowskiA. (eds.), Psychology of music today: Proceedings of the international seminar of researchers and lecturers in the psychology of music, Radziejowice, Poland1990, (pp. 138–147). Warsaw, Poland: Fryderyik Chopin Academy of Warsaw.
20.
NewellA.RosenbloomP. S. (1981). Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In AndersonJ. R. (ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition, (pp. 1–55). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21.
NielsenS. G. (1997). Self-regulation of learning strategies during practice: A case study of a church organ student preparing a musical work for performance. In JørgensenH.LehmannA. (eds.), Does practice make perfect? Current theory and research on instrumental music practice (pp. 109–122). Oslo, Norway: Norges musikkhogskole.
22.
PalmerW A. (ed.) (1968). J. S. Bach Inventions and Sinfonias. Alfred Music.
23.
Piano Syllabus (1986). Royal Conservatory of Music Toronto: Piano Syllabus. Royal Conservatory, Toronto, Canada.
24.
PierceR.FuszekR. (1987). The P-F Guide: A conceptual approach to piano instruction. West Covina, CA: Author.
25.
ReppB. H. (1990). Patterns of expressive timing in performances of a Beethoven minuet by nineteen famous pianists. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 622–640.
26.
ReppB. H. (1994). On determining the basic tempo of an expressive music performance. Psychology of Music, 22, 157–167.
27.
ReppB. H. (1995). Expressive timing in Schumann's “Träumerei”: An analysis of performances by graduate student pianists. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98, 2413–2427.
28.
Rubin-RabsonG. (1940). Studies in the psychology of memorizing piano music: III. A comparison of the whole and the part approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 31, 460–476.
29.
Rubin-RabsonG. (1941). Studies in the psychology of memorizing piano music: V. A comparison of pre-study periods of varied length. Journal of Educational Psychology, 32, 101–112.
30.
SeashoreC. E. (1938/1967). The psychology of music. New York: Dover. Originally published 1938.
31.
ShafferL. H. (1980). Analysing piano performance: A study of concert pianists. In StelmachG. E.RequinJ. (eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior, (pp. 443–455). Amsterdam: North Holland.
32.
ShafferL. H. (1981). Performances of Chopin, Bach, and Bartok: Studies in motor programming. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 326–376.
33.
ShafferL. H.ToddN. P. (1987). The interpretive component in musical performance. In GabrielssonA. (ed.), Action and perception in rhythm and music (pp. 137–152). Stockholm, Sweden: Royal Swedish Academy of Music.
34.
SlobodaJ. A. (1994). Music performance: Expression and the development of musical excellence. In AielloR.SlobodaJ. A. (eds.), Musical perceptions (pp. 152–172). New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
SlobodaJ. A.DavidsonJ. W.HoweM. J. A.MooreD. G. (1996). The role of practice in the development of performing musicians. British Journal of Psychology, 87, 287–309.
36.
The Pianist [Computer software]. (1993). Buffalo, NY: PG Music, Inc.
37.
WagnerC. (1974). Experimented Untersuchungen Über das Tempo. Österreichische Musikzeitschrift, 29 (12), 589–604.
38.
WeissenbergA. (1985). Estampes. On Piano Music. Selections [compact disk]. Hamburg, Germany: Deutsche Grammophon.
39.
WingA. M.KristoffersonA. B. (1973). The timing of interresponse intervals.
40.
Perception and Psychophysics, 13, 455–460.
41.
WoltersK.GoebelsF. (1967). Handbuch der Klavierliteratur. Zürich, Switzerland: Atlantis.
