Applying the networked flow model in a real-world music contest

Abstract

Flow and creativity have always held a special link in artistic domains. Music-making is increasingly demonstrated as a source of group flow and collaborative musical creativity. The Networked Flow (NF) model outlines factors supporting optimal collaborative group work in different contexts, including music. The model suggests that high levels of affect, group flow, and social presence are crucial for optimal group creativity, along with the progressive emergence of a particular group communication structure. Therefore, it would be crucial to study group creativity over time by examining communication dynamics, experiential features, and creative outcomes. In this study, the NF model was applied to a 2-day real-world music contest. A total of nine bands and eight rappers participated in the first round of the contest. At the end of the first round, each band was randomly paired with a rapper, forming new bands that were asked to compose a piece of music and perform it in the second round of the contest a month later. Measures of affect, group flow, social presence, communication structure, self-assessed and expert-rated performance outcomes, and creativity in group performance were collected during each of the two rounds. Methods of evaluating creative collaboration included Social Network Analysis (communication structure) and Consensual Assessment Technique (creativity in group performance). Significant positive correlations between group flow and social presence emerged. Only one of the three judges reported an increase in group creativity in the final phase. There was little agreement between the judgments of the expert judges and participants in terms of artists’ creativity and performance. Flow dimensions were positively correlated with self-rated performance outcomes and creativity but not with expert-rated performance outcomes. Bands that scored high for flow had a specific communication structure, characterized by high-status members. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of how group flow and intersubjective dynamics interact in live music.

Keywords

performance group flow social presence group creativity music

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amabile

T. M.

(1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 997.

Amabile

T. M.

Barsade

S. G.

Mueller

J. S.

Staw

B. M.

(2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 367–403.

Baer

McKool

S. S.

(2009). Assessing creativity using the consensual assessment technique. In Schreiner

(Ed.), Handbook of research on assessment technologies, methods, and applications in higher education (pp. 65-77). IGI Global.

Barrett

M. S.

Creech

Zhukov

(2021). Creative collaboration and collaborative creativity: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 713445.

Belzak

W. C.

Thrash

T. M.

Sim

Y. Y.

Wadsworth

L. M.

(2017). Beyond hedonic and eudaimonic well-being: Inspiration and the self-transcendence tradition. In The happy mind: Cognitive contributions to well-being (pp. 117–138). Springer.

Bethelmy

L. C.

Corraliza

J. A.

(2019). Transcendence and sublime experience in nature: Awe and inspiring energy. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 509.

Biocca

Harms

(2003). Guide to the networked minds social presence inventory v. 1.2: Measures of co-presence, social presence, subjective symmetry, and intersubjective symmetry. Michigan State University.

Chirico

Serino

Cipresso

Gaggioli

Riva

(2015). When music “flows.” State and trait in musical performance, composition and listening: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 906. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00906

Cseh

G. M.

Jeffries

K. K.

(2019). A scattered CAT: A critical evaluation of the consensual assessment technique for creativity research. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(2), 159.

10.

Csíkszentmihályi

(1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper Collins.

11.

Csikszentmihalyi

(2014). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity (pp. 47–61). Springer Netherlands.

12.

Csíkszentmihályi

Abuhamdeh

Nakamura

(2005). Flow. In Handbook of Competence and Motivation (pp. 598–608).

13.

Csíkszentmihályi

Rich

(1997). Musical improvisation: A systems approach. Creativity in Performance, 43–66.

14.

Diana

Villani

Muzio

Riva

(2012). La validazione italiana della Flow State Scale—FSS. In Muzio

Riva

Argenton

(Eds.), Flow, benessere e prestazione eccellente. Dai modelli teorici alle applicazioni nello sport e in azienda (pp. 123–142). FrancoAngeli.

15.

Eun

(2017). The zone of proximal development as an overarching concept: A framework for synthesizing Vygotsky’s theories. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(1), 18–30.

16.

Gaggioli

Chirico

Mazzoni

Milani

Riva

(2017). Networked Flow in musical bands. Psychology of Music, 45(2), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735616665003

17.

Gaggioli

Mazzoni

Benvenuti

Galimberti

Bova

Brivio

Cipresso

Riva

Chirico

(2020). Networked flow in creative collaboration: A mixed method study. Creativity Research Journal, 32(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1712160

18.

Gaggioli

Mazzoni

Milani

Riva

(2015). The creative link: Investigating the relationship between social network indices, creative performance and flow in blended teams. Computers in Human Behavior, 42, 157–166.

19.

Gaggioli

Milani

Mazzoni

Riva

(2011). Networked flow: A framework for understanding the dynamics of creative collaboration in educational and training settings. The Open Education Journal, 4(1), 107–115.

20.

Gaggioli

Riva

Milani

Mazzoni

(2012). Networked flow: Towards an understanding of creative networks. Springer.

21.

Gaggioli

Riva

Milani

Mazzoni

(2013a). Networked flow: Towards an understanding of creative networks. Springer.

22.

Gaggioli

Riva

Milani

Mazzoni

(2013b). Analyzing the experience of networked flow through social network analysis. In Networked flow (pp. 71–99), Springer.

23.

Gaggioli

Riva

Milani

Mazzoni

(2013c). The cognitive foundations of networked flow: Intentions, presence, and social presence. In Networked flow (pp. 21–53). Springer.

24.

Galimberti

Chirico

Brivio

Mazzoni

Riva

Milani

Gaggioli

(2015). Bridging minds: A mixed methodology to assess networked flow. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 219, 33–36.

25.

Garrison

D. R.

Vaughan

N. D.

(2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. John Wiley & Sons.

26.

Glăveanu

V. P.

(2015). Creativity as a sociocultural act. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 49(3), 165–180.

27.

Harmat

de Manzano

Ö.

Ullén

(2021). Flow in music and arts. In Advances in flow research (pp. 377–391). Springer.

28.

Harms

Biocca

(2004). Internal consistency and reliability of the networked minds measure of social presence. Seventh Annual International Workshop: Presence.

29.

Hart

Di Blasi

(2015). Combined flow in musical jam sessions: A pilot qualitative study. Psychology of Music, 43(2), 275-290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735613517422

30.

Hutchins

(2006). The distributed cognition perspective on human interaction. Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction, 1, 375.

31.

John-Steiner

(2000). Creative collaboration. Oxford University Press.

32.

Kitson

Chirico

Gaggioli

Riecke

B. E.

(2020). A review on research and evaluation methods for investigating self-transcendence. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(2880). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.547687

33.

Marin

M. M.

Bhattacharya

(2010). Music induced emotions: Some current issues and cross-modal comparisons. Music Education, 1–38.

34.

Persson

R. S.

(2001). The subjective world of the performer. In Juslin

P. N.

Sloboda

J. A.

(Eds.), Music and emotion: Theory and research (pp. 275–289). Oxford University Press.

35.

Sawyer

(2012). Extending sociocultural theory to group creativity. Vocations and Learning, 5(1), 59–75.

36.

Sawyer

R. K.

(2003). Group creativity: Music, theater, collaboration. Psychology Press.

37.

Sawyer

R. K.

(2008). Group genius: The creative power of collaboration. Basic Books.

38.

Schiavio

Bashwiner

D. M.

Jung

R. E.

(2021). What is musical creativity? Interdisciplinary dialogues and approaches. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 796096.

39.

Schiavio

Moran

van der Schyff

Biasutti

Parncutt

(2022). Processes and experiences of creative cognition in seven western classical composers. Musicae Scientiae, 26(2), 303–325.

40.

Scott

(1991). Social network analysis: A handbook. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

41.

Tan

Sin

H. X.

(2021). Flow research in music contexts: A systematic literature review. Musicae Scientiae, 25(4), 399–428.

42.

Tay

Tan

Goh

(2021). A PRISMA review of collective flow experiences in music contexts. Psychology of Music, 49(3), 667–683.

43.

Terraciano

McCrae

R. R.

Costa

P. T.

Jr. (2003). Factorial and construct validity of the Italian Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19(2), 131.

44.

Veresov

(1999). Undiscovered Vygotsky: Etudes on the pre-history of cultural-historical psychology. Peter Lang.

45.

Vygotsky

L. S.

Cole

(1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

46.

Wasserman

Faust

(1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.

47.

Woody

R. H.

McPherson

G. E.

(2010). Emotion and motivation in the lives of performers. Handbook of music and emotion: Theory, Research, Applications, 401–424.

48.

Zielke

Anglada-Tort

Berger

(2023). Inducing and disrupting flow during music performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1187153.