Sensitivity to music reward varies across individuals. The Barcelona Music Reward Questionnaire (BMRQ) is an effective tool in the assessment of sensitivity to music reward. The current study investigated the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the BMRQ, including its internal consistency, factor structure, criterion-related validity, and measurement invariance across gender. In addition, the relationship between personality traits and sensitivity to music reward was explored. A total of 1,120 Chinese undergraduate students completed a pen-and-paper version of the BMRQ, either in individual sessions or in class groups. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated a good fit for the revised model of the BMRQ. In addition, good internal consistency reliability of the overall scale and criterion-related validity with the BIS/BAS scale were also supported in this study. Evidence of configural, metric, and scalar invariance supported its measurement invariance across gender. On this basis, women in our sample reported themselves more sensitive than men to music reward. Results also showed that the personality traits Openness to Experience and Agreeableness were the strongest contributors to music reward sensitivity, while Extraversion did not make a significant contribution. These findings may provide a reference point for therapists wishing to predict the efficacy of music therapy for individuals.
BloodA. J.ZatorreR. J. (2001). Intensely pleasurable responses to music correlate with activity in brain regions implicated in reward and emotion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(20), 11818. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.191355898
4.
BoerD.FischerR. (2011). Towards a holistic model of functions of music listening across cultures: A culturally decentred qualitative approach. Psychology of Music, 40(2), 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735610381885
5.
BoerD.FischerR.TekmanH. G.AbubakarA.NjengaJ.ZengerM. (2012). Young people’s topography of musical functions: Personal, social and cultural experiences with music across genders and six societies. International Journal of Psychology, 47(5), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.656128
6.
CarverC. S.WhiteT. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 319–333.
7.
ChapmanL. J.ChapmanJ. P.RaulinM. L. (1976). Scales for physical and social anhedonia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 85(4), 374–382. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.85.4.374
8.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
9.
ColverM. C.El-AlayliA. (2015). Getting aesthetic chills from music: The connection between openness to experience and frisson. Psychology of Music, 44(3), 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735615572358
10.
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
11.
de VoogdL. D.KanenJ. W.NevilleD. A.RoelofsK.FernándezG.HermansE. J. (2018). Eye-movement intervention enhances extinction via amygdala deactivation. The Journal of Neuroscience, 38(40), 8694–8706. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.0703-18.2018
12.
EgertonA.MehtaM. A.MontgomeryA. J.LappinJ. M.HowesO. D.ReevesS. J.CunninghamV. J.GrasbyP. M. (2009). The dopaminergic basis of human behaviors: A review of molecular imaging studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 33(7), 1109–1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.05.005
FerrandoP. J. (2012). Assessing the discriminating power of item and test scores in the linear factor-analysis model. Psicológica, 33(1), 111–134.
15.
FrickeK. R.HerzbergP. Y. (2017). Personality and self-reported preference for music genres and attributes in a German-speaking sample. Journal of Research in Personality, 68, 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.01.001
16.
Grau-SánchezJ.DuarteE.Ramos-EscobarN.SierpowskaJ.RuedaN.RedónS.Veciana de las HerasM.PedroJ.SärkämöT.Rodríguez-FornellsA. (2018). Music-supported therapy in the rehabilitation of subacute stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1423(1), 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13590
17.
GrebF.SchlotzW.SteffensJ. (2017). Personal and situational influences on the functions of music listening. Psychology of Music, 46(6), 763–794. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735617724883
GuptaU.GuptaB. (2016). Gender differences in psychophysiological responses to music listening. Music and Medicine, 8(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.47513/mmd.v8i1.471
20.
HairJ.BlackW.BabinB.AndersonR. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th edition). Pearson Prentice Hall.
21.
HolmS. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6(2), 65–70. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4615733
22.
HooperD.CoughlanJ.MullenM. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.
23.
HuL. t.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
24.
JuslinP. N.LiljeströmS.LaukkaP.VästfjällD.LundqvistL.-O. (2011). Emotional reactions to music in a nationally representative sample of Swedish adults: Prevalence and causal influences. Musicae Scientiae, 15(2), 174–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864911401169
KoelschS.FritzT.v. CramonD. Y.MüllerK.FriedericiA. D. (2006). Investigating emotion with music: An fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 27(3), 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20180
27.
KuntscheE.Le MévelL.BersonI. (2015). Development of the four-dimensional Motives for Listening to Music Questionnaire (MLMQ) and associations with health and social issues among adolescents. Psychology of Music, 44(2), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735614562635
28.
LadinigO.SchellenbergE. G. (2012). Liking unfamiliar music: Effects of felt emotion and individual differences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(2), 146–154. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024671
29.
LanX.WangW. (2020). To be shy or avoidant? Exploring the longitudinal association between attachment and depressive symptoms among left-behind adolescents in rural China. Personality and Individual Differences, 155, 109634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109634
30.
LiY.ZhangY.JiangY.LiH.MiS.YiG.. . . JiangY. (2008). The Chinese version of the BIS/BAS scale: Reliability and validity [in Chinese]. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 22, 613–616.
31.
LonsdaleA. J.NorthA. C. (2011). Why do we listen to music? A uses and gratifications analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 102(1), 108–134. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712610x506831
32.
LoosE.SchicktanzN.FastenrathM.CoynelD.MilnikA.FehlmannB.EgliT.EhrlerM.PapassotiropoulosA.de QuervainD. J.-F. (2020). Reducing amygdala activity and phobic fear through cognitive top-down regulation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 32(6), 1117–1129. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01537
33.
Lorenzo-SevaU.FerrandoP. J. (2006). FACTOR: A computer program to fit the exploratory factor analysis model. Behavior Research Methods, 38(1), 88–91. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192753
Martínez-MolinaN.Mas-HerreroE.Rodríguez-FornellsA.ZatorreR. J.Marco-PallarésJ. (2019). White matter microstructure reflects individual differences in music reward sensitivity. The Journal of Neuroscience, 39(25), 5018–5027. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2020-18.2019
37.
Mas-HerreroE.Marco-PallaresJ.Lorenzo-SevaU.ZatorreR. J.Rodriguez-FornellsA. (2013). Individual differences in music reward experiences. Music Perception, 31(2), 118–138. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2013.31.2.118
38.
McCraeR. R. (1993). Openness to experience as a basic dimension of personality. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 13(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.2190/H8H6-QYKR-KEU8-GAQ0
MenonV.LevitinD. J. (2005). The rewards of music listening: Response and physiological connectivity of the mesolimbic system. NeuroImage, 28(1), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.05.053
41.
MichelyJ.RigoliF.RutledgeR. B.HauserT. U.DolanR. J. (2020). Distinct processing of aversive experience in amygdala subregions. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, 5(3), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.07.008
42.
MontagC.ReuterM.AxmacherN. (2011). How one’s favorite song activates the reward circuitry of the brain: Personality matters!Behavioural Brain Research, 225(2), 511–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2011.08.012
43.
MoriK.IwanagaM. (2015). General reward sensitivity predicts intensity of music-evoked chills. Music Perception, 32(5), 484–492. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2015.32.5.484
44.
MuthénB. O.MuthénL. K. (2012). Mplus 7 base program. Muthén & Muthén.
45.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2002). How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(4), 599–620. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0904_8
46.
NaterU. M.AbbruzzeseE.KrebsM.EhlertU. (2006). Sex differences in emotional and psychophysiological responses to musical stimuli. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 62(2), 300–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.05.011
47.
NaveG.MinxhaJ.GreenbergD. M.KosinskiM.StillwellD.RentfrowJ. (2018). Musical preferences predict personality: Evidence from active listening and Facebook likes. Psychological Science, 29(7), 1145–1158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618761659
48.
OysermanD.CoonH. M.KemmelmeierM. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3
49.
ParkM.Hennig-FastK.BaoY.CarlP.PöppelE.WelkerL.. . . GutyrchikE. (2013). Personality traits modulate neural responses to emotions expressed in music. Brain Research, 1523, 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2013.05.042
50.
PulverA.KiiveE.HarroJ. (2020). Reward sensitivity, affective neuroscience personality, symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and TPH2-703G/T (rs4570625) genotype. Acta Neuropsychiatrica, 32(5), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1017/neu.2020.18
51.
RosenbergN.GreenbergD. M.LambM. E. (2021). Musical engagement is linked to posttraumatic resilience: The role of gender, personality, and music listening styles after childhood trauma. Music & Science, 4, 2059204321993731. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059204321993731
52.
SalibaJ.Lorenzo-SevaU.Marco-PallaresJ.TillmannB.ZeitouniA.LehmannA. (2016). French validation of the Barcelona Music Reward Questionnaire. PeerJ, 4, e1760. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1760
53.
SalimpoorV. N.BenovoyM.LarcherK.DagherA.ZatorreR. J. (2011). Anatomically distinct dopamine release during anticipation and experience of peak emotion to music. Nature Neuroscience, 14(2), 257–262. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2726
54.
SilviaP. J.FaynK.NusbaumE. C.BeatyR. E. (2015). Openness to experience and awe in response to nature and music: Personality and profound aesthetic experiences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(4), 376–384. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000028
55.
SilviaP. J.NusbaumE. C. (2011). On personality and piloerection: Individual differences in aesthetic chills and other unusual aesthetic experiences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(3), 208–214. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021914
56.
SotoC. J.JohnO. P. (2017a). The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 117–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000096
57.
SotoC. J.JohnO. P. (2017b). Short and extra-short forms of the Big Five Inventory—2: The BFI-2-S and BFI-2-XS. Journal of Research in Personality, 68, 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.02.004
58.
StarckeK.von GeorgiR.TiihonenT. M.LaczikaK.-F.ReuterC. (2019). Don’t drink and chill: Effects of alcohol on subjective and physiological reactions during music listening and their relationships with personality and listening habits. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 142, 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.06.001
59.
ten BergeJ. M. F.KrijnenW. P.WansbeekT.ShapiroA. (1999). Some new results on correlation-preserving factor scores prediction methods. Linear Algebra and its Applications, 289(1), 311–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3795(97)10007-6
60.
TorrubiaR.ÁvilaC.MoltóJ.CaserasX. (2001). The Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ) as a measure of Gray’s anxiety and impulsivity dimensions. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(6), 837–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00183-5
61.
TriandisH. C. (2018). Individualism and Collectivism. Routledge.
VandenbergR. J.LanceC. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002
64.
van de SchootR.LugtigP.HoxJ. (2012). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(4), 486–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2012.686740
65.
WangM.DaiX.YaoS. (2011). Development of the Chinese big five personality inventory (CBF-PI) III: psychometric properties of CBF-PI brief version [in Chinese]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 19, 454-457.
66.
XuL.WenX.ShiJ.LiS.XiaoY.WanQ.QianX. (2020). Effects of individual factors on perceived emotion and felt emotion of music: Based on machine learning methods. Psychology of Music. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735620928422
67.
ZatorreR. J. (2015). Musical pleasure and reward: mechanisms and dysfunction. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1337(1), 202-211. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12677
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
