In this study, we examined how audiences for different types of concerts structure their musical preferences according to specific cultural logics and how this relates to the motives for going to the concert. We used large-scale audience data collected at 73 concerts in Belgium (n = 1594). Using Correlational Class Analysis, we inductively uncovered four different cultural logics: omnivore vs. disinterested; highbrow vs. lowbrow; acoustic vs. electric; and anything but/with distortion. Accordingly, besides the well-documented oppositions between highbrow and lowbrow, and between omnivorousness and univorousness, we found two other cultural logics among concert audiences. In subsequent analyses, we related these cultural logics to concert genre (e.g., classical and electronic) and mode of consuming concerts (e.g., music-centered and entertainment-centered). We demonstrate that mode of consumption is associated with both concert genre and the cultural logic to which one adheres.
BeateP.WilliamsL. (2019). One foot in the rave: Ageing ravers’ transitions to adulthood and their participation in rave culture. Leisure Sciences. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2019.1675560
2.
BennettA. (2004). Consolidating the music scenes perspective. Poetics, 32, 223–234.
3.
BennettT.EmmisonM.FrowJ. (1999). Accounting for tastes: Australian everyday cultures. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BerghmanM.van EijckK. (2009). Visual arts appreciation patterns: Crossing horizontal and vertical boundaries within the cultural hierarchy. Poetics, 37, 348–365.
5.
BourdieuP. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
BoutylineA. (2017). Improving the measurement of shared cultural schemas with Correlational Class Analysis. Sociological Science, 4, 353–393.
8.
BrownS. C.KnoxD. (2016). Why go to pop concerts? The motivations behind live music attendance. Musicae Scientiae, 21, 233–249
9.
BrysonB. (1996). “Anything but heavy metal”: Symbolic exclusion and musical dislikes. American Sociological Review, 61, 884–899.
10.
CheyneA.BinderA. (2010). Cosmopolitan preferences: The constitutive role of place in American elite taste for hip-hop music 1991–2005. Poetics, 38, 336–364.
11.
DaenekindtS. (2017). On the structure of dispositions. Transposability of and oppositions between aesthetic dispositions. Poetics, 62, 43–52.
12.
DaenekindtS. (2019). Out of tune. How people understand social exclusion at concerts. Poetics, 74, 101341.
13.
DaenekindtS.RooseH. (2017). Ways of preferring: Distinction through the ‘what’ and the ‘how’ of cultural consumption. Journal of Consumer Culture, 17, 25–45.
14.
DiMaggioP. (1977). Market structure, the creative process, and popular culture: Toward an organizational reinterpretation of mass-culture theory. The Journal of Popular Culture, 11, 436–452.
15.
DiMaggioP.MukhtarT. (2004). Arts participation as cultural capital in the United States, 1982–2002: Signs of decline?Poetics, 32, 169–194.
16.
DunnP. G.de RuyterB.BouwhuisD. G. (2011). Toward a better understanding of the relation between music preference, listening behavior, and personality. Psychology of Music, 40, 411–428.
17.
EmmisonM. (2003). Social class and cultural mobility: Reconfiguring the cultural omnivore thesis. Journal of Sociology, 39, 211–230.
18.
EpskampS.CramerA. O. J.WaldorpL. J.SchmittmannV. D.BorsboomD. (2012). qgraph: Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–18.
19.
FrithS. (1996a). Performing Rites: On the Value of Popular Music. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
FrithS. (1996b). Music and identity. In HallS.du GayP. (Eds.), Questions of cultural identity (Vol. 4, pp. 108–127). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
21.
FrithS. (Ed.) (2004). Popular Music: The rock era. London, UK: Routledge.
22.
GarciaL.-M. (2015). Techno-tourism and post-industrial neo-romanticism in Berlin’s electronic dance music scenes. Tourist Studies, 16, 276–295.
23.
GardikiotisA.BaltzisA. (2011). ‘Rock music for myself and justice to the world!’: Musical identity, values, and music preferences. Psychology of Music, 40, 143–163.
24.
GilesH.DenesA.HamiltonD. L.HajdaJ. M. (2009). Striking a chord: A prelude to music and intergroup relations research. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 291–301.
25.
GoldbergA. (2011). Mapping shared understandings using Relational Class Analysis: The case of the cultural omnivore reexamined. American Journal of Sociology, 116, 1397–1436.
26.
Grebosz-HaringK.WeichboldM. (2018). Contemporary art music and its audiences: Age, gender, and social class profile. Musicae Scientiae, 1–18. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864918774082.
27.
HallJ. R. (1992). The capital(s) of culture: A non-holistic theory of status situations, class, gender, and ethnicity. In LamontM.FournierM. (Eds.) Cultivating differences (pp. 257–285). Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
28.
HargreavesD. J.Bonneville-RoussyA. (2017). What is ‘open-earedness’, and how can it be measured?Musicae Scientiae, 22, 161–174.
29.
HesmondhalghD. (2006). Bourdieu, the media and cultural production. Media, Culture & Society, 28, 211–231.
30.
HillsM. (2002). Fan cultures. London: Routledge.
31.
HoltD. B. (1997). Poststructuralist lifestyle analysis: Conceptualizing the social patterning of consumption in postmodernity. Journal of Consumer Research, 23, 326–350.
32.
HoltD. B. (1998). Does cultural capital structure American consumption?Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 1–25.
33.
JægerM. M.Katz-GerroT. (2011). Top of the pops, ascend of the omnivores, defeat of the couch potatoes: Cultural consumption profiles in Denmark 1975–2004. European Sociological Review, 29, 243–260.
34.
JarnessV. (2015). Modes of consumption: From ‘what’ to ‘how’ in cultural stratification research. Poetics, 53, 65–79.
35.
JohnstonJ.BaumannS.OleschukM. (2019). Omnivorousness, distinction, or both? In WherryF. F.WoodwardI. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of consumption (pp. 361–380). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
36.
LaermansR. (1993). The relative rightness of Pierre Bourdieu: Some sociological comments on the legitimacy of postmodern art, literature and culture. Cultural Studies, 6, 248–260.
37.
LahireB. (2003). From the habitus to an individual heritage of dispositions. Towards a sociology at the level of the individual. Poetics, 31, 329–355.
38.
LahireB. (2008). The individual and the mixing of genres: Cultural dissonance and self-distinction. Poetics, 36, 166–188.
39.
LarsenG.LawsonR.ToddS. (2009). The consumption of music as self-representation in social interaction. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ)17, 16–26.
40.
LenaJ. C.PetersonR. A. (2008). Classification as culture: Types and trajectories of music genres. American Sociological Review, 73, 697–718.
41.
LeguinaA.Arancibia-CarvajalS.WiddopP. (2015). Musical preferences and technologies: Contemporary material and symbolic distinctions criticized. Journal of Consumer Culture, 17, 242–264.
42.
LizardoO.SkilesS. (2008). Cultural consumption in the fine and popular arts realms. Sociology Compass, 2, 285–502.
43.
LonsdaleA. J.NorthA. C. (2009). Musical taste and ingroup favouritism. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 319–327.
44.
MartinB. (1979). The sacralization of disorder: Symbolism in rock music. Sociological Analysis, 40, 87–124.
45.
MauchM.MacCallumR. M.LevyM.LeroiA. M. (2015). The evolution of popular music: USA 1960–2010. Royal Society Open Science, 2, 150081–150081.
46.
MillerD. L. (2014). Symbolic capital and gender: Evidence from two cultural fields. Cultural Sociology, 8, 462–482.
47.
O’SullivanT. (2009). All together now: A classical music audience as a consuming community. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 12, 209–223.
48.
PetersonR. A. (1997). The rise and fall of highbrow snobbery as a status marker. Poetics, 25, 75–92.
49.
PetersonR. A. (2005). Problems in comparative research: The example of omnivorousness. Poetics, 33, 257–282.
50.
PetersonR. A.KernR. M. (1996). Changing highbrow taste: From snob to omnivore. American Sociological Review, 61, 900–907.
51.
PrieurA.RosenlundL.Skjott-LarsenJ. (2008). Cultural capital today: A case study from Denmark. Poetics, 36, 45–71.
52.
RegevM. (1994). Producing artistic value: The case of rock music. The Sociological Quarterly, 35, 85–102.
53.
RentfrowP. J.GoslingS. D. (2003). The do re mi’s of everyday life: The structure and personality correlates of music preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1236–1256.
54.
RentfrowP. J.GoslingS. D. (2006). Message in a ballad: The role of music preferences in interpersonal perception. Psychological Science, 17, 236–242.
55.
RentfrowP. J.McDonaldJ. A.OldmeadowJ. A. (2009). You are what you listen to: Young people’s stereotypes about music fans. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 329–344.
56.
RentfrowP. J.GoldbergL. R.LevitinD. J. (2011). The structure of musical preferences: A five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 1139–1157.
57.
RösselJ. (2011). Cultural capital and the variety of modes of cultural consumption in the opera audience. The Sociological Quarterly, 52, 83–103.
58.
SchubertE.HargreavesD. J.NorthA. C. (2014). A dynamically minimalist cognitive explanation of musical preference: Is familiarity everything?Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 38–38.
59.
SchulzeG. (1992). Die erlebnisgesellschaft: Kultursoziologie der gegenwart [The adventure society: Contemporary sociology of culture]. Frankfurt, Germany: Campus Verlag. [In German.]
60.
ShepherdD.SiggN. (2015). Music preference, social identity, and self-esteem. Music Perception, 32, 507–514.
61.
SonnettJ. (2004). Musical boundaries: Intersections of form and content. Poetics, 32, 247–264.
62.
StrawW. (1991). Systems of articulation, logics of change: Communities and scenes in popular music. Cultural Studies, 5, 368–388.
63.
TampubolonG. (2010). Social stratification and cultures hierarchy among the omnivores: Evidence from the Arts Council England surveys. The Sociological Review, 58, 1–25.
64.
TekmanH. G.HortaçsuN. (2002). Music and social identity: Stylistic identification as a response to musical style. International Journal of Psychology, 37, 277–285.
65.
ThorntonS. (1995). Club cultures: Music, media and subcultural capital. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
66.
TrizzullaC.Garcia-BardidiaR.RémyE. (2016). From Bourdieu to Lahire: Social determinism and pluralist consumer practices. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition), 31, 85–102.
67.
van EijckK. (2001). Social differentiation in musical taste patterns. Social Forces, 79, 1163–1185.
68.
van VenrooijA.SchmutzV. (2010). The evaluation of popular music in the United States, Germany and the Netherlands: A comparison of the use of high art and popular aesthetic criteria. Cultural Sociology, 4, 395–421
69.
VlegelsJ.LievensJ. (2017). Music classification, genres, and taste patterns: A ground-up network analysis on the clustering of artist preferences. Poetics, 60, 76–89.
70.
WillekensM.LievensJ. (2014). Family (and) culture: The effect of cultural capital within the family on the cultural participation of adolescents. Poetics, 42, 98–113.
