Increased age has been found to be associated with differences in musical preferences in adulthood. In past research, these differences were mostly attributed to changes in the social context. However, these influences were small and a large proportion of variance in age trends in musical preferences still remains to be explained. The aim of this article is to investigate the hypothesis that age trends in musical preferences are related to differences in preferences for some intrinsic attributes of the music in line with the Music Preferences in Adulthood Model (Bonneville-Roussy et al., 2017). Adult participants (N = 481) were asked to rate their preferences for extracts of 51 audio-music recordings (music clips) and musical attributes related to dynamics, pitch, structure, tempo, and timbre. Audio-features of the 51 clips were extracted using Music Information Retrieval methods. Using self-report, we found that the musical preferences of adults were linked with distinct likings for musical attributes, with large effects. We also discovered that self-rated attributes associated with dynamics and timbre moderated the links between age and musical preferences. Using the extracted features, we found that musical preferences were linked with distinct patterns of musical features. Finally, we established that the patterns of preferences of emerging, young and middle-aged adults were increasingly influenced by audio-features of timbre, dynamics and tonal clarity. These findings suggest that age trends in musical preferences could be partially explained by differences in the ways individuals process the intrinsic attributes of the music with age.
AgrawalY.PlatzE. A.NiparkoJ. K. (2008). Prevalence of hearing loss and differences by demographic characteristics among US adults. Archives of Internal Medicine, 168, 1999–2004.
2.
AlluriV.ToiviainenP. (2010). Exploring perceptual and acoustical correlates of polyphonic timbre. Music Perception, 27, 223–242.
3.
AnariM.AxelssonA.EliassonA.MagnussonL. (1999). Hypersensitivity to sound. Scandinavian Audiology, 28, 219–230.
4.
BeveridgeS.KnoxD. (2009). An exploration of the effect of structural and acoustical features on perceived musical emotion. In Proceedings of Audio Mostly, 4th Conference on Interaction with Sound. Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland.
5.
Bonneville-RoussyA. (2016). Dataset of the Music Genres-Clips Test (MG-CT). Open Science Framework. doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/4EX7X
6.
Bonneville-RoussyA.RentfrowP. J.XuM. K.PotterJ. (2013). Music through the ages: Trends in musical engagement and preferences from adolescence through middle adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 703–717.
7.
Bonneville-RoussyA.RustJ. N. (2018). Age trends in musical preferences in adulthood: 2. Sources of social influences as determinants of preferences. Musicae Scientiae, 22(2), 175–195.
8.
Bonneville-RoussyA.StillwellD.KosinskiM.RustJ. (2017). Age trends in musical preferences in adulthood: 1. Conceptualization and empirical investigation. Musicae Scientiae, 21(4), 369–389.
9.
BuusS.FlorentineM. (2002). Growth of loudness in listeners with cochlear hearing losses: Recruitment reconsidered. JARO - Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 3, 120–139.
10.
CharlesS. T.CarstensenL. L. (2010). Social and emotional aging. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 383–409.
11.
CroghanN. B. H.ArehartK. H.KatesJ. M. (2012). Quality and loudness judgments for music subjected to compression limiting. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132, 1177–1188.
12.
DrakeC.JonesM. R.BaruchC. (2000). The development of rhythmic attending in auditory sequences: Attunement, referent period, focal attending. Cognition, 77, 251–288.
13.
DunnG. P. (2010). The music in you: Investigating personality-based recommendation. Eindhoven, The Netherlands: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.
14.
DunnG. P.de RuyterB.BouwhuisD. G. (2011). Toward a better understanding of the relation between music preference, listening behavior, and personality. Psychology of Music, 40, 411–428.
15.
DunnG. P.JurgenW.JaapH.AroyoL. (2009). Evaluating interface variants on personality acquisition for recommender systems. In HoubenG.-J.McCallaG.PianesiF.ZancanaroM. (Eds.), User modeling, adaptation, and personalization. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 5535, pp. 259–270). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
16.
EerolaT. (2011). Are the emotions expressed in music genre-specific ? An audio-based evaluation of datasets spanning classical, film, pop and mixed genres. Journal of New Music Research, 40, 349–366.
17.
EerolaT. (2012). Modeling listeners’ emotional response to music. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4, 607–624.
18.
EerolaT.FerrerR. (2009). Setting the standards: Normative data on audio-based musical features for musical genres. In Proceedings of the 7th Triennial Conference of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music. Jyväskylä, Finland.
19.
EerolaT.FerrerR.AlluriV. (2012). Timbre and affect dimensions: Evidence from affect and similarity ratings and acoustic correlates of isolated instrument sounds. Music Perception, 30, 49–70.
20.
EerolaT.LartillotO.ToiviainenP. (2009). Prediction of multidimensional emotional ratings in music from audio using multivariate regression models. In Proceedings of the 10th International Society for Music Information Retrieval (pp. 621–626). Kobe, Japan.
21.
FerrerR.EerolaT. (2010). Timbral qualities of semantic structures of music. In Proceedings of the 11th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (pp. 571–576). Utrecht, the Netherlands.
22.
FerrerR.EerolaT. (2011). Semantic structures of timbre emerging from social and acoustic descriptions of music. EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing, 2011, 11. doi:10.1186/1687-4722-2011-11
23.
FerrerR.EerolaT.VuoskoskiJ. K. (2012). Enhancing genre-based measures of music preference by user-defined liking and social tags. Psychology of Music, 41, 499–518.
24.
FitzgibbonsP. J.Gordon-SalantS. (2010). Behavioral studies with aging humans: Hearing sensitivity and psychoacoustics. In Gordon-SalantS.FrisinaR. D.PopperA. N.FayR. R. (Eds.), The aging auditory system (Vol. 34, pp. 111–134). New York: Springer.
25.
FlorentineM.PopperA. N.FayR. R. (2011). Loudness. New York: Springer.
26.
GabrielssonA.LindströmE. (2010). The role of structure in the musical expression of emotions. In JuslinP. N. (Ed.), Handbook of music and emotion: Theory, research, applications (pp. 367–400). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27.
GatesG. A.MillsJ. H. (2005). Presbycusis. The Lancet, 366, 1111–1120.
28.
Gordon-SalantS. (2005). Hearing loss and aging: New research findings and clinical implications. The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 42, 9–24.
29.
Gordon-SalantS.FrisinaR. D. (2010). Introduction and overview. In Gordon-SalantS.FrisinaR. D.PopperA. N.FayR. R. (Eds.), The aging auditory system (pp. 1–8). New York: Springer.
30.
Gordon-SalantS.FrisinaR. D.PopperA. N.FayR. R. (Eds.). (2010). The aging auditory system. New York: Springer.
31.
GreasleyA. E.LamontA. M. (2006). Music preference in adulthood : Why do we like the music we do? In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition. Bologna, Italy.
32.
GreenbergD. M.KosinskiM.StillwellD. J.MonteiroB. L.LevitinD. J.RentfrowP. J. (2016). The song is you: Preferences for musical attribute dimensions reflect personality. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 597–605.
33.
HannonE. E.TrainorL. J. (2007). Music acquisition: Effects of enculturation and formal training on development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 466–472.
34.
HargreavesD. (1982). The development of aesthetic reactions to music. Psychology of Music, [Special Issue], 51–54.
35.
HargreavesD. J.Bonneville-RoussyA. (2018). What is “open-earedness”, and how can it be measured?Musicae Scientiae, 22(2), 161–174.
36.
HargreavesD. J.ColmanA. M. (1981). The dimensions of aesthetic reactions to music. Psychology of Music, 9, 15–20.
37.
HemmingJ. (2013). Is there a peak in popular music preference at a certain song-specific age? A replication of Holbrook & Schindler’s 1989 study. Musicae Scientiae, 17, 293–304.
38.
HolbrookM. B.SchindlerR. M. (1989). Some exploratory findings on the development of musical tastes. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 119–124.
39.
HoodJ. D.PooleJ. P. (1966). Tolerable limit of loudness: Its clinical and physiological significance. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 40, 47–54.
40.
JanssenS. M. J.MurreJ. M. J. (2008). Reminiscence bump in autobiographical memory: Unexplained by novelty, emotionality, valence, or importance of personal events. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1847–1860.
41.
JohnstonK. N. (2009). Music perception of hearing-impaired listeners: Effects of hearing aid settings and personality factors (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Florida, FL. (UMI No. 3400268)
42.
JuslinP. N.LaukkaP. (2003). Communication of emotions in vocal expression and music performance: Different channels, same code?Psychological Bulletin, 129, 770–814.
43.
JuslinP. N.LaukkaP. (2004). Expression, perception, and induction of musical emotions: A review and a questionnaire study of everyday listening. Journal of New Music Research, 33, 217–238.
44.
JuslinP. N.LiljeströmS.VästfjällD.BarradasG.SilvaA. (2008). An experience sampling study of emotional reactions to music: Listener, music, and situation. Emotion, 8, 668–683.
45.
KrumhanslC. L.ZupnickJ. A. (2013). Cascading reminiscence bumps in popular music. Psychological Science, 24, 2057–2068.
46.
LamereP. (2008). Social tagging and music information retrieval. Journal of New Music Research, 37, 101–114.
47.
LangmeyerA.Guglhör-RudanA.TarnaiC. (2012). What do music preferences reveal about personality?Journal of Individual Differences, 33, 119–130.
48.
LartillotO.ToiviainenP. (2007). A matlab toolbox for musical feature extraction from audio. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Audio Effects (pp. 1–8). Bordeaux, France.
49.
LeblancA.SimsW. L.SiivolaC.ObertM. (1996). Music style preferences of different age listeners. Journal of Research in Music Education, 44, 49–59.
50.
LeekM. R.MolisM. R.KubliL. R.TuftsJ. B. (2008). Enjoyment of music by elderly hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 19, 519–526.
51.
LesaffreM.LemanM.De VoogdtL.De BaetsB.de MeyerH.MartensJ.-P. (2006, August). A user-dependent approach to the perception of high-level semantics of music. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition. Bologna, Italy.
52.
MacDormanK. F.OughS.HoC.-C. (2007). Automatic emotion prediction of song excerpts: Index construction, algorithm design, and empirical comparison. Journal of New Music Research, 36, 281–299.
53.
NorthA. C. (2010). Individual differences in musical taste. American Journal of Psychology, 123, 199–208.
54.
NorthA. C.HargreavesD. J. (1995). Eminence in pop music. Popular Music and Society, 19, 41–66.
55.
PhillipsL. H.HenryJ. D.HosieJ. A.MilneA. B. (2006). Age, anger regulation and well-being. Aging & Mental Health, 10, 250–256.
56.
PrattR.DoakP. (1976). A subjective rating scale for timbre. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 45, 317–328.
57.
PunchJ.JosephA.RakerdB. (2004). Most comfortable and uncomfortable loudness levels: Six decades of research. American Journal of Audiology, 13, 144–157.
58.
RentfrowP. J. (2012). The role of music in everyday life: Current directions in the social psychology of music. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 402–416.
59.
RentfrowP. J.GoldbergL. R.LevitinD. J. (2011). The structure of musical preferences: A five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 1139–1157.
60.
RentfrowP. J.GoldbergL.StillwellD.KosinskiM.GoslingS. D.LevitinD. J. (2012). The song remains the same: A replication and extension of the MUSIC model. Music Perception, 30, 161–185.
61.
RentfrowP. J.GoslingS. D. (2003). The do re mi’s of everyday life: The structure and personality correlates of music preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1236–1256.
62.
RentfrowP. J.McDonaldJ. A. (2009). Music preferences and personality. In JuslinP.SlobodaJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of music and emotion (pp. 669–695). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
63.
SaarikallioS. (2010). Music as emotional self-regulation throughout adulthood. Psychology of Music, 39, 307–327.
64.
SchäferT. (2016). The goals and effects of music listening and their relationship to the strength of music preference. PLoS ONE, 11(e0151634). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0151634
65.
SchedlM.FlexerA.UrbanoJ. (2013). The neglected user in music information retrieval research. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 41, 523–539.
66.
SchindlerR. M.HolbrookM. B. (2003). Nostalgia for early experience as a determinant of consumer preferences. Psychology and Marketing, 20, 275–302.
67.
SchmucklerM. A. (2016). Tonality and contour in melodic processing. In HallamS.CrossI.ThautM. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music psychology (pp. 143–166). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
68.
SchubertE. (2004). Modeling perceived emotion with continuous musical features. Music Perception, 21(4), 561–585.
69.
SmithD. S. (1989). Preferences for differentiated frequency loudness levels in older adult music listening. Journal of Music Therapy, 26, 18–29.
70.
TrainorL.HeinmillerB. (1998). The development of evaluative responses to music: Infants prefer to listen to consonance over dissonance. Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 77–88.
71.
TurnbullD.MemberS.BarringtonL.TorresD.LanckrietG. (2008). Semantic annotation and retrieval of music and sound effects. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 16, 467–476.
72.
VatolkinI.RötterG.WeihsC. (2014). Music genre prediction by low-level and high-level characteristics. In SpiliopoulouM.Schmidt-ThiemeL.JanningR. (Eds.), Data analysis, machine learning and knowledge discovery (pp. 427–434). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.
73.
WeihsC.LiggesU.MörchenF.MüllensiefenD. (2007). Classification in music research. Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, 1, 255–291.
74.
ZentnerM. R.GrandjeanD.SchererK. R. (2008). Emotions evoked by the sound of music: Characterization, classification, and measurement. Emotion, 8, 494–521.
75.
ZentnerM. R.KaganJ. (1996). Perception of music by infants. Nature, 383, 29–29.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
