The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of repeated attempts at singing accuracy tasks. Test-retest reliability of singing accuracy was examined in a second administration of the test. A secondary purpose was to analyze individual variability in children’s singing accuracy. Test stimuli were designed using five attempts each at a single pitch, interval, and four-note pattern, and song singing. Children aged 6–11 were given the one-on-one singing accuracy test, and an identical form of the test was administered again within 1–6 weeks. Pitch matching items were scored by measuring the deviation in Hertz from the stimuli. The song singing item was scored by singing teachers using an 8-point scale with acceptable inter-rater reliability (r = .86). Participants’ individual best attempt out of five was equally distributed, with overall performance increasing across subsequent attempts measured in signed cent deviation. A repeated-measures ANOVA with the task type (single, interval, and pattern) and attempt (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) as the within-subjects variables indicated no main effect for task type (p = .129), but a significant main effect for attempt (p < .001, = .087). Test-retest reliability was considered high (r = .69).
AllenM. J.YenW. M. (2001). Introduction to measurement theory. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
2.
BerkowskaM.Dalla BellaS. (2013). Uncovering phenotypes of poor-pitch singing: The Sung Performance Battery (SPB). Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 714. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00714
3.
BoersmaP.WeeninkD. (2015). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 6.0.07) [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/
4.
BrophyT. S. (1997). Authentic assessment of vocal pitch accuracy in first through third grade children. Contributions to Music Education, 24(1), 57–70.
5.
CohenA. (2015). The AIRS test battery of singing skills: Rationale, item types, and lifetime scope. Musicae Scientae, 19(3), 238–264.
6.
CohenA.PanB.StevensonL.McIverA. (2015). Does non-native language influence learning a melody? A comparison of native English and Chinese university students on the AIRS test battery of singing skills. Musicae Scientae, 19(3), 301–324.
7.
Dalla BellaS. (2015). Defining poor-pitch singing. Music Perception, 32(3), 272–282.
8.
Dalla BellaS.BerkowskaM. (2009). Singing proficiency in the majority. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1169(1), 99–107.
9.
DemorestS. M.NicholsB. E.PfordresherP. Q. (2016). The effect of focused instruction on kindergartener’s singing accuracy. Manuscript in preparation.
10.
DemorestS. M.PfordresherP. Q.Dalla BellaS.HutchinsS.LouiP.RutkowskiJ.WelchG. (2015). Methodological perspectives on singing accuracy: An introduction to the special issue on singing accuracy (Part 2). Music Perception, 32(3), 266–271.
11.
GoodA.RussoF. A. (2015, August). Singing and multi-cultural group cohesion. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Music Perception and Cognition, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
12.
HutchinsS.Larrouy-MaestriP.PeretzI. (2014). Singing ability is rooted in vocal-motor control of pitch. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 76(8), 2522–2530.
13.
Larrouy-MaestriP.LevequeY.SchonD.GiovanniA.MorsommeD. (2013). The evaluation of singing voice accuracy: A comparison between subjective and objective methods. Journal of Voice, 27(2), 251–259.
14.
MooreR.BrotonsM.FykJ.CastilloA. (1997). Effects of culture, age, gender, and repeated trials on rote learning skills of children 6-9 years old from England, Panama, Poland, Spain, and the United States. Bulletin for the Council of Research in Music Education, 133, 83–88.
15.
NicholsB. E. (2015). Critical variables in singing accuracy test construction: A review of literature. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 34. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/8755123315576764
16.
NicholsB. E. (2016). Doubling as an important variable in singing accuracy research. Manuscript submitted for publication.
17.
NicholsB. E. (in press). Task-based variability in children’s singing accuracy. Journal of Research in Music Education.
18.
Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349, 6251.
19.
PfordresherP. Q.BrownS. (2007). Poor-pitch singing in the absence of “tone deafness”. Music Perception, 25(2), 95–115.
20.
PfordresherP. Q.Larrouy-MaestriP. (2015). On drawing a line through the spectrogram: How do we understand deficits of vocal pitch imitation?Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 271. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00271
21.
PorterS. Y. (1977). The effect of multiple discrimination training on pitch matching behaviors of uncertain singers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 25(1), 68–82.
22.
RutkowskiJ.MillerM. S. (2003). The effect of teacher feedback and modeling on first graders’ use of singing voice and developmental music aptitude. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 156, 1–10.
23.
SalvadorK. (2010). How can elementary teachers measure singing voice achievement? A critical review of assessments, 1994–2009. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 29(1), 40–47.
24.
ShroutP. E.FleissJ. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420–428.
25.
SinorE. (1984). The singing of selected tonal patterns by preschool children (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (AAT 8501456)
26.
WelchG. (2015). Singer identities and educational environments. In MacDonaldR.MiellD.HargreavesD. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of musical identities. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
27.
WelchG.SergeantD.WhiteP. J. (1995). The singing competencies of five-year-old developing singers. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 127, 155–162.
28.
WiseK. J.SlobodaJ. A. (2008). Establishing an empirical profile of self-defined “tone deafness”: Perception, singing performance and self-assessment. Musicae Scientiae, 12(1), 3–26.
29.
WolfD. (2005). A hierarchy of tonal performance patterns for children ages five to eight years in kindergarten and primary grades. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 163, 61–68.
30.
YarbroughC.GreenG.BensonW.BowersJ. (1991). Inaccurate singers: An exploratory study of variables affecting pitch matching. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 107, 23–34.
