What makes an artificial musical instrument such as the flute, trombone or cello sound like the human voice, and which of all instruments is the most voicelike? This article reviews acoustical and psychological arguments that might explain why a musical instrument would be likened to the singing human voice. The authors could find no evidence to support the idea of any single instrument being systematically, and consistently, regarded as voicelike. The human voice is frequently referred to as an ideal to which a well-played musical instrument should aspire. However, investigations are few that go beyond speculation and introspection regarding what instrument or instruments sound voicelike and why. Although no single instrument emerged as being systematically and consistently voicelike, a program of empirical research is suggested to determine whether there currently exist (possibly culturally promulgated) beliefs about what instrument is considered most voicelike and why.
AskenfeltA. (1991). Voices and strings: Close cousins or not? In SundbergJ.NordL.CarlsonR. (Eds.), Music, Language, Speech and Brain: Proceedings of an International Symposium at the Wenner-Gren Center, Stockholm, 5–8 September 1990 (pp. 243–256). New York, NY: Macmillan.
2.
AtkinsonJ. E. (1978). Correlation analysis of the physiological factors controlling fundamental voice frequency. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 63, 211–222.
3.
BelloJ. P.DaudetL.AbdallahS.DuxburyC.DaviesM.SandlerM. B. (2005). A tutorial on onset detection in music signals. Speech and Audio Processing, IEEE Transactions on, 13, 1035–1047.
4.
BergerK. W. (1964). Some factors in the recognition of timbre. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 36, 1888–1891.
5.
BishopL.GoeblW. (2014). Context-specific effects of musical expertise on audiovisual integration. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01123
6.
ChartrandJ.-P.BelinP. (2006). Superior voice timbre processing in musicians. Neuroscience letters, 405, 164–167.
7.
ChenJ.-M.SmithJ.WolfeJ. (2009). Pitch bending and glissandi on the clarinet: Roles of the vocal tract and partial tone hole closure. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126, 1511–1520.
8.
ClarkJ.YallopC.FletcherJ. (2007). An introduction to phonetics and phonology. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
9.
CookP. R. (1996). Singing voice synthesis: History, current work, and future directions. Computer Music Journal, 20, 38–46.
10.
CookP. R. (1998). Toward the perfect audio morph? Singing voice synthesis and processing. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Digital Audio Effects (DAFX), Barcelona. Retrieved 29 January 2016 from https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~serafin/UVA/MUSI445/Cook98.pdf
11.
DahlhausC. (1989). The idea of absolute music (LustigR., Trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1978)
12.
DanksH. (1979). The viola d’amore. Halesowen, UK: Stephen Bonner.
13.
DolanE. I. (2008). ETA Hoffmann and the ethereal technologies of “nature music”. Eighteenth Century Music, 5, 7–26.
14.
FabianD.TimmersR.SchubertE. (Eds.). (2014). Expressiveness in music performance: A cross cultural and interdisciplinary approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
15.
FantG. (1960). Acoustic theory of speech production (Vol. 2). The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton & Co. N. V.
16.
FeugèreL.d’AlessandroC.DovalB. (2013). Performative voice synthesis for edutainment in acoustic phonetics and singing: A case study using the “Cantor Digitalis”. In Intelligent technologies for interactive entertainment (Vol. 124, pp. 169–178). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.
17.
FletcherN. H.RossingT. D. (1998). The physics of musical instruments. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
18.
GalantucciB.FowlerC. A.TurveyM. T. (2006). The motor theory of speech perception reviewed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 361–377.
19.
GarnierM.HenrichN.SmithJ.WolfeJ. (2010). Vocal tract adjustments in the high soprano range. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127, 3771–3780.
20.
GoehrL. (1998). The quest for voice: On music, politics, and the limits of philosophy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
21.
GreyJ. (1977). Multidimensional perceptual scaling of musical timbres. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61, 1270–1277.
22.
HadlockH. (2000). Sonorous bodies: Women and the glass harmonica. Journal of the American Musicological Society, 53, 507–542.
23.
HankinsT. L.SilvermanR. J. (1995). Instruments and the imagination. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
HeldG. F. (1998). Weaving and triumphal shouting in Pindar, Pythian 12.6–12. The Classical Quarterly (New Series), 48, 380–388.
25.
HelmholtzH. L. F. (1912). On the sensations of tone as a physiological basis for the theory of music (EllisA. J., Trans., 4th ed.). London, UK: Longmans, Green, and Co.
26.
HirschbergA.PelorsonX.GilbertJ. (1996). Aeroacoustics of musical instruments. Meccanica, 31, 131–141.
27.
HirtK. M. (2010). When machines play Chopin: Musical spirit and automation in nineteenth-century German literature (Vol. 8). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
28.
HondaK.HiraiH.MasakiS.ShimadaY. (1999). Role of vertical larynx movement and cervical lordosis in F0 control. Language and Speech, 42, 401–411.
JuslinP. N. (2000). Vocal expression and musical expression: Parallels and contrasts. In KappasA. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixteenth Conference of the International Society for Research on Emotions (pp. 281–284): Quebec City, Canada: ISRE Publications.
31.
JuslinP. N.HarmatL.EerolaT. (2014). What makes music emotionally significant? Exploring the underlying mechanisms. Psychology of Music, 42, 599–623.
32.
JuslinP. N.LaukkaP. (2003a). Communication of emotions in vocal expression and music performance: Different channels, same code?Psychological Bulletin, 129, 770–814.
33.
JuslinP. N.LaukkaP. (2003b). Emotional expression in speech and music. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1000, 279–282.
34.
JuslinP. N.VästfjällD. (2008). Emotional responses to music: The need to consider underlying mechanisms. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 559–575.
35.
KellerP. E. (2012). Mental imagery in music performance: Underlying mechanisms and potential benefits. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1252, 206–213.
36.
KendallR. A.CarteretteE. C.HajdaJ. M. (1999). Perceptual and acoustical features of natural and synthetic orchestral instrument tones. Music Perception, 16, 327–363.
37.
LakatosS. (2000). A common perceptual space for harmonic and percussive timbres. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1426–1439.
38.
LawsonC.StowellR. (1999). The historical performance of music: An introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39.
LevyD. A.GranotR.BentinS. (2001). Processing specificity for human voice stimuli: Electrophysiological evidence. Neuroreport, 12, 2653–2657.
40.
LevyD. A.GranotR.BentinS. (2003). Neural sensitivity to human voices: ERP evidence of task and attentional influences. Psychophysiology, 40, 291–305.
41.
LiW.ChenJ.-M.SmithJ.WolfeJ. (2015). Vocal tract resonances and the timbre of the saxophone. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 101, 270–278.
42.
MithenS. (2005). The singing neanderthals: The origins of music, language, mind and body. London, UK: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
43.
MithenS. (2009). Holistic communication and the coevolution of language and music: Resurrecting an old idea. In BothaR.KnightC. (Eds.), The prehistory of language (pp. 58–76). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
44.
NisbettR. E.WilsonT. D. (1977). The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 250.
45.
NovembreG.TiciniL. F.Schütz-BosbachS.KellerP. E. (2012). Distinguishing self and other in joint action: Evidence from a musical paradigm. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 2894–2903.
46.
PatelA. D. (2008). Music, lanugage, and the brain. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
47.
PatelA. D.IversenJ. R. (2003). Acoustic and perceptual comparison of speech and drum sounds in the North Indian tabla tradition: An empirical study of sound symbolism. In SoléJ.RecasensD.RomeroJ. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS) (pp. 925–928). Barcelona, Spain: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
48.
PrestonS. D.De WaalF. (2002). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 1–20.
49.
PriceU.LauderT. D. (1842). The picturesque: With an essay on the origin of taste and much original matter. Edinburgh, UK: Caldwell, Lloyd & Co.
50.
PrinzW. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129–154.
51.
ReadG. (1993). Compendium of modern instrumental techniques. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
52.
ReillyE. R. (1997). Quantz and the transverse flute: Some aspects of his practice and thought regarding the instrument. Early Music, 25, 429–438.
53.
ReuterC. (2002). Klangfarbe und Instrumentation. Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.
54.
SammlerD.KoelschS.BallT.BrandtA.ElgerC. E.FriedericiA. D.… WellmerJ. (2009). Overlap of musical and linguistic syntax processing: Intracranial ERP evidence. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1169, 494–498.
55.
SammlerD.KoelschS.BallT.BrandtA.GrigutschM.HuppertzH.-J.… ElgerC. E. (2013). Co-localizing linguistic and musical syntax with intracranial EEG. Neuroimage, 64, 134–146.
56.
SarrisH.TzevelekosP. (2008). “Singing like the gaida (bagpipe)”: Investigating relations between singing and instrumental playing techniques in Greek Thrace. Journal of Interdisciplinary Music Studies, 2, 33–57.
57.
SchererK. R. (1995). Expression of emotion in voice and music. Journal of Voice, 9, 235–248.
58.
SchubertE.FabianD. (2014). A taxonomy of listeners’ judgments of expressiveness in music performance. In FabianD.TimmersR.SchubertE. (Eds.), Expressiveness in music performance: A cross cultural and interdisciplinary approach (pp. 283–303). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
59.
SchubertE.WolfeJ. (2013). The rise of fixed pitch systems and the slide of continuous pitch: A note for emotion in music research about portamento. Journal of Interdisciplinary Music Studies, 7, (1–2), 1–28.
60.
SmithR.MercerD. (1974). Possible causes of woodwind tone colour. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 32, 347–358.
61.
Standards Secretariat (1994). American National Standard Acoustical Terminology (12.41), ANSI S1.1–1994 (R2004) C.F.R. Melville, NY: Acoustical Society of America.
62.
SteinerD. (2013). The Gorgons’ lament: Auletics, poetics, and chorality in Pindar’s Pythian 12. American Journal of Philology, 134, 173–208.
63.
SulzerJ. G.BakerN. K.ChristensenT. S. (1995). Aesthetics and the art of musical composition in the German enlightenment: Selected writings of Johann Georg Sulzer and Heinrich Christoph Koch. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
64.
SundbergJ. (1989). Synthesis of singing by rule. In MathewsM.PierceJ. (Eds.), Current directions in computer music research (pp. 45–55). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
65.
SwerdlinY.SmithJ.WolfeJ. (2010). The effect of whisper and creak vocal mechanisms on vocal tract resonances. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127, 2590–2598.
66.
TarnopolskyA.FletcherN.HollenbergL.LangeB.SmithJ.WolfeJ. (2005). The vocal tract and the sound of a didgeridoo. Nature, 39, 436.
67.
TarnopolskyA. Z.FletcherN. H.HollenbergL. C.LangeB. D.SmithJ.WolfeJ. (2006). Vocal tract resonances and the sound of the Australian didjeridu (yidaki) I. Experiment. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 1194–1204.
68.
ThayerR. C. (1974). The effect of the attack transient on aural recognition of instrumental timbres. Psychology of Music, 2, 39–52.
69.
TitzeI. R. (1994). Principles of voice production. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
70.
TraubeC.D’AlessandroN. (2005). Vocal synthesis and graphical representation of the phonetic gestures underlying guitar timbre description. In 8th International Conference on Digital Audio Effects (DAFx’05) (pp. 104–109), Madrid, Spain.
71.
TraubeC.DepalleP. (2004). Phonetic gestures underlying guitar timbre description. In LipscombS. D.AshleyR.GjerdingenR. O.WebsterP. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, August 3–7 (pp. 658–661). Adelaide, Australia: Causal Productions.
72.
TraubeC.DepalleP. (2004b). Timbral analogies between vowels and plucked string tones. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP’04) (pp. 293–296vol. 294). New York, NY: IEEE.
73.
TurnerD. W.MooreA. (1852). The odes of Pindar. London, UK: Henry G. Bohn.
74.
WedinL.GoudeG. (1972). Dimension analysis of the perception of instrumental timbre. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 13(3), 228–240.
75.
WeissM. W.TrehubS. E.SchellenbergE. G. (2012). Something in the way she sings enhanced memory for vocal melodies. Psychological Science, 23, 1074–1078.
76.
WolfeJ. (2002). Speech and music, acoustics and coding, and what music might be “for”. In StevensD. B. K.McPhersonG.SchubertE.RenwickJ. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition (pp. 10–13). Adelaide, Australia: Causal.
77.
WolfeJ. (2007). Speech and music: Acoustics, signals and the relation between them. Proceedings of ICoMCS December, Sydney, Australia (pp. 176–179).
78.
WolfeJ.SchubertE. (2012). Stable, quantised pitch in singing and instrumental music: Signals, acoustics and possible origins. Acoustics 2012 Fremantle: Acoustics, Development and the Environment. Perth, Australia: The Australian Acoustical Society, Western Australian Division.
