Throughout the history of electroacoustic music, creative collaboration has been a constant feature due to the complexity of the technology. All laboratories and electronic music studios involved the presence of different individuals with diverse, intertwined competencies. In particular, the embedding of technological tools into the process of musical creation prompted the rise of a new “agent” called the Computer Music Designer (CMD), who can work in writing, creating new instruments, recording and/or performance. Audiences as well as the academia have long been unaware of this emerging profession and its crucial role in the creative process of electroacoustic, electronic and computer music. This study sheds light on the socio-professional profile and expertise of the CMD in order to better understand how computer music design contributes to shaping electronic music as we know it. We present the methodology and outcomes of a questionnaire submitted to several CMDs. The purpose was to investigate this emerging community by means of an instrument permitting anonymity. Findings help to understand how the CMDs perceive their profession; trace common paths and habits among CMDs; and study this community from the point of view of their age, training, tasks, legal status, recognition, skills, professional identity and involvement in technological migration. The questionnaire instrument is appended.
AdhémarJ. (1939). Les origines du nom de graveur. Bibliothèque de L’école des Chartes, 100, 234–238.
2.
BellerG. (2014). The Synekine project. In BevilacquaF.Fdili AlaouiS.FrançoisJ.PasquierP.SchiphorstT. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2014 International Workshop on Movement and Computing [MOCO’14] (pp. 66–69). New York: ACM.
3.
BornG. (1995). Rationalizing culture: Ircam, Boulez and the institutionalization of the musical avant-garde. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
BoutardG.GuastavinoC. (2012). Préservation d’artéfacts culturels numériques. Les Cahiers du Numérique, 2912/4, vol. 8.
6.
ChadabeJ. (1997). Electric sound: The past and promise of electronic music. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7.
CollinsN.d’EscrivânJ. (2007). The Cambridge companion to electronic music. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
DeanR. (2009). The Oxford handbook of computer music. New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
DemazièreD.GadéaC. (2009). Sociologie des groupes professionnels. Acquis récents et nouveaux défis. Paris, France: La Découverte.
10.
DoninN. (forthcoming 2016). Domesticating gesture: The collaborative creative process of Florence Baschet’s StreicherKreis for ‘augmented’ string quartet (2006–2008). In ClarkeE.DoffmanM. (Eds.), Creativity, improvisation and collaboration: Perspectives on the performance of contemporary music. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
DowerC.O’NeilE.HoughH. (2001). Profiling the professions: A model for evaluating emerging health professions. San Francisco, CA: Center for the Health Professions, University of California.
12.
DuranteS.ZattraL. (2002). Vent’anni di musica elettronica all’Università di Padova. Il Centro di sonologia computazionale. Palermo and Padova, Italy: CIMS/CLEUP.
13.
FaiaC. (2014). Collaborative computer music composition and the emergence of the computer music designer. Unpublished PhD thesis. London, UK: College of Business, Arts and Social Sciences, Brunel University.
LympouridisE. (2012). Design strategies for whole body interactive performance systems. Unpublished PhD thesis. Edinburgh, UK: College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Edinburgh College of Arts, The University of Edinburgh.
16.
ManningP. (2013). Electronic and computer music (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
MengerP.-M. (1989). Les laboratoires de la création musicale. Acteurs, organisations et politique de la recherche musicale. Paris, France: La Documentation Française.
18.
MengerP.-M. (2005). Les intermittents du spectacle. Sociologie d’une exception. Paris, France: Éditions de l’école des hautes études en sciences sociales.
19.
NelsonA. J. (2015). The sound of innovation: Stanford and the computer music revolution. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
20.
PearceD. S. (2014). An emerging profession: The Higher Education Philanthropy Workforce. A report to HEFCE by More Partnership and Richmond Associates. London/Bristol and Dundee, UK: Higher Education Funding Council for England and More Partnership.
21.
PlessasP.BoutardG. (2015). Transmission et interprétation de l’instrument électronique composé. Proceedings Journées d’Informatique Musicale (Montréal, 7–9May2015). Retrieved from jim2015.oicrm.org/actes/JIM15_Plessas_P_et_al.pdf
22.
PolettiM.MaysT.FaiaC. (2002). Assistant musical ou producteur? Esquisse d’un nouveau métier. Proceedings Journées d’Informatique Musicale (Marseille, 29–31 May 2002), 241–246. Retrieved from http://jim.afim-asso.org/jim2002/articles/L29_Mays.pdf
23.
PrasA.GuastavinoC. (2011). The role of music producers and sound engineers in the current recording context, as perceived by young professionals. Musicae Scientiae, 15, 73–95.
24.
RissetJ.-C. (2014). A la recherche du temps réel – Pierre Boulez et la fondation de l’Ircam. Jean-Claude Risset in interview with Gabriel Leroux and Frank Madlener. L’étincelle. Journal de la Création à L’ircam, 12, 12–15.
25.
SabatiniJ. P.DanielsM.GinsburgL.LimeulK.RussellM.StitesR. (2000). Teacher perspectives on the Adult Education Profession: National survey findings about an emerging profession (Report No. NCAL-TR00–02, 2000–10–26). SRI International, Menlo Park, CA: National Center on Adult Literacy Philadelphia, PA. Retrieved from eric.ed.gov/?id=ED446230
VidolinA. (1997). Musical interpretation and signal processing. In RoadsC.PopeS.PiccialliA.De PoliG. (Eds.), Musical signal processing (pp. 439–459). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
28.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29.
ZattraL. (2013). Les origines du nom de RIM (Réalisateur en Informatique Musicale). Proceedings Journées d’Informatique Musicale (Paris, 13–15 May 2013, pp. 113–120). Retrieved from www.mshparisnord.fr/JIM2013/actes/jim2013_14.pdf
30.
ZattraL. (2014a). A colloquio con Roberto Fabbriciani. Rassegna Musicale Curci, 3, LXVII – September2014, 45–51. Milan, Italy: Curci.
31.
ZattraL. (2014b). Interdisciplinarità, collaborazione, didattica e diffusione a Torino (1963), Firenze (1964) e Padova (1965). In ValleA.BassaneseS. (Eds.), Enore Zaffiri. Saggi e materiali (pp. 124–148). Venezia, Italy: IUAV; AIMI, Associazione Informatica Musicale Italiana.
32.
ZattraL. (2015). Collaboration in computer music. An analysis of the role played by musical assistants obtained through semi-structured interviews. TCPM – Tracking the Creative Process in Music (Paris, 8–9October2015). Oral presentation.
33.
ZattraL. (forthcoming 2016). Collaborating on composition: The role of the musical assistant at IRCAM, CCRMA and CSC. In SallisF.ZattraL.BurleighI. (Eds.), Live-electronic music: Composition, performance and study. London, UK: Routledge.
