It has been said that participation in master classes provides an initiation into a community of practice (Hanken, 2008; Creech et al., 2009) and that contemporary practices in higher music education are strongly informed by those of the past (Froehlich, 2002, cf. Heikinheimo, 2009). This is certainly true of public master classes which provide students with the opportunity to perform in public and to receive feedback on their performance from a high-profile master musician. In terms of expertise, the master musician is perceived to possess an exceptional blend of musical knowledge derived first from rigorous training in the values and methods of a particular tradition (or traditions) of musical performance, and second from their own career as a high-profile performer. In this study we investigated conservatoire students’ experiences and perceptions of public master classes as articulated through the instrument they study, their gender and year in college. The findings revealed a significant main effect for the instrument studied and a statistically significant interaction effect between instrument studied, gender and year at college. The findings suggested that perspectives on the concept of musical excellence were articulated through gender. Further, having examined students’ performing and listening experiences and perceptions of public master classes, we concluded that these were to some extent determined by intrinsically exclusive or inclusive attitudes towards music, originating in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries respectively. We discuss these mechanisms in terms of implicit transmission during years of training in the students’ principal instrument of study.
AbeleA. (2003). The dynamics of masculine agentic and feminine communal traits: Findings from a prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(4), 768–776.
2.
ArnoldD. (1980). Education in music. In SadieS. (Ed.), The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, Vol. 6 (pp. 18–58). London, Macmillan.
3.
BlackingJ. (1995). Music, Culture and Experience: Selected papers of John Blacking, ByronR. (Ed.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
BlaukopfK. (1992). Musical life in a changing society. Portland, OR.: Amadeus Press.
5.
BrownS.MerkerB.WallinN. (2001). An introduction to evolutionary musicology. In WallinN.MerkerB.BrownS. (Eds.), The origins of music (pp. 3–24). London: Bradford.
6.
BujićB. (1988). Music in European thought, 1850–1912. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BusseyK.BanduraA. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106(4), 676–713.
8.
CitronM. (1993). Gender and the musical canon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
CorkhillD. (2005). A young person’s guide to the orchestral profession. British Journal of Music Education, 22(3), 269–285.
10.
CreechA.GauntH.HallamS.RobertsonL. (2009). Conservatoire students’ perceptions of master classes. British Journal of Music Education, 26(3), 315–331.
11.
CreechA.PapageorgiI.DuffyC.MortonF.HaddonE.PotterJ.de BezenacC.WhytonT.HimonedesE.WelchG. (2008). From music student to professional: The process of transition. British Journal of Music Education, 25(3), 315–331.
12.
DavidsonJ. W.HoweM. J.SlobodaJ. A. (1997). Environmental factors in the development of musical performance skill over the lifespan. In HargreavesD. J.NorthA. C. (Eds.). The social psychology of music (pp. 188–208). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
DavidsonJ. W.KingE. (2004). Strategies for ensemble practice. In WilliamonA. (Ed.), Musical excellence: Strategies and techniques to enhance performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
DawkinsR. (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
ElliottD. (1990). Music as culture: Towards a multicultural concept of arts education. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 24(1), 147–166.
16.
EricssonK. A.KrampeR.Tesch-RoemerC. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406.
17.
FreemanW. (2001). A neurobiological role of music in social bonding. In WallinN. L.MerkerB.BrownS.The origins of music (pp. 411–424). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
18.
FroehlichH. (2002). Thoughts on schools of music and colleges of education as places of ‘Rites and Rituals’: Consequences for research on practising. In HankenI. M.NielsenS. G.NerlandM. (Eds.), Research in and for higher music education: Festchrift for Harald Jørgensen (pp. 149–165). Oslo: Norwegian Academy of Music.
19.
GiddensA. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
20.
GreenL. (2003). Why ‘ideology’ is still relevant for critical thinking in music education, Action, Criticism and Theory for Music Education. Retrieved from www.act.maydaygroup.org.
21.
GreenL. (2007). Music, informal learning and the school: A new classroom pedagogy. Aldershot: Ashgate.
22.
HallamS. (1995). Professional musicians’ approaches in the learning and interpretation of music. Psychology of Music, 23(2), 111–128.
23.
HallamS. (2001). ‘The development of metacognition in musicians: implications for education’, The British Journal of Music Education, 18(1), 27–39.
24.
HankenI. M. (2008). Teaching and learning music performance: The master class. The Finnish Journal of Music Education, 11(1), 26–36.
25.
HauserM. D.ChomskyN.FitchW. T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?Science, 298, 1569–1579.
26.
HeikinheimoT. (2009). Intensity of interaction in instrumental music lessons. Helsinki: Studia Musica 40, Sibelius Academy.
27.
JørgensenH. (1995). Music education as community. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 29(3), 71–84.
28.
KennellR. (1989). Three teacher scaffolding strategies in college applied music instruction. Dissertation Abstracts International, 50, 2822-A (University microfilms No 89–17656).
29.
KennellR. (2002). Systematic research in studio instruction in music, In ColwellRichardson (Eds), The new handbook of research on music teaching and learning (pp. 243–256). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
KingsburyH. (1988). Music, talent and performance: A conservatory cultural system. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
31.
KoopmanC.SmitN.de VugtA.DeneerP.den OudenJ. (2007). Focus on practice-relationships between lessons on the primary instrument and individual practice in conservatoire education. Music Education Research, 9(3), 373–397.
32.
L’HommidieuR. L. (1992). The management of selected educational variables by master studio teachers in music performance (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
33.
LangnerD. (2003). Flawed expertise: Exploring the need to overcome the discrepancy between instrumental training and orchestral work – the case of string players. In DavidsonJ (Ed), The Music Practitioner (pp. 251–259). Aldershot: Ashgate.
34.
LalliR. (2004). Master plan: How to get the most out of a master class. Opera News, 69(1),24–26.
LongM.HallamS.CreechA.GauntH.RobertsonL. (2011). Do prior experience, gender, or level of study influence music students’ perspectives on master classes?Psychology of Music. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0305735610394709.
37.
MaehrM. L.PintrichP. R.LinnenbrinkE. A. (2002). Motivation and achievement. In ColwellRichardson (Eds.), The new handbook of research on music teaching and learning (pp. 348–372). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
McCarthyM. (2007). Narrative inquiry as a way of knowing in music education. Research Studies in Music Education, 29, 3–12.
39.
MilderJ. (2010, September). Teaching improvisers – an oral tradition through trial and error: What is the significance of ‘error’ in the development of a musical language that no one else but the improvising musician will ‘speak’? Students’ Ownership of Learning. Symposium. The Royal College of Music in Stockholm, Sweden.
40.
MolinoJ. (2001). Towards an evolutionary theory of music and language. In WallinN. L.MerkerB.BrownS. (Eds.), The origins of music (pp. 165–176). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
41.
NerlandM. (2007) One-to-one teaching as cultural practice: Two case studies from an academy of music, Music Education Research, 9(3), 399–416.
42.
NerlandM.HankenI. M. (2002). Academies of music as arenas for education: Some reflections on the institutional construction of teacher-student relationships. In HankenI. M.NielsenS. G.NerlandM. (Eds.), Research in and for higher music education. Festschrift for Harald Jørgensen (pp. 167–186). Oslo: Norwegian Academy of Music.
43.
NielsenS. (1999). Regulation of learning strategies during practice: A case study of a single church organ student preparing a particular work for a concert performance, Psychology of Music, 32(4), 418–431.
44.
NielsenS. G. (2004). Strategies and self-efficacy beliefs in instrumental and vocal individual practice: A study of students in higher music education. Psychology of Music, 32(4), 418–431.
45.
NielsenS. G. (2008). Achievement goals, learning strategies and instrumental performance. Music Education Research, 10(2), 236–247.
46.
OdamG.BannonN. (2005). The reflective conservatoire. Aldershot: Ashgate.
47.
SalgadoA. G. (2003) Rethinking voice evaluation in singing. In DavidsonJ (Ed.), The music practitioner (pp. 193–199). Aldershot: Ashgate.
48.
SchwabH. W. (1980). Guilds. In SadieS. (Ed.), The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, Vol. 7 (pp. 809–811). London: Macmillan.
49.
SchwartzB. (1980a). Paganini, Nicolo. In SadieS. (Ed.), The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, Vol. 14 (pp. 86–91). London: Macmillan.
50.
SchwartzB. (1980b). Wienaiwski. In SadieS. (Ed.), The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, Vol. 20 (pp. 404–406). London: Macmillan.
SlobodaJ. A.HoweM. (1991). Biographical precursors of musical excellence: An interview study. Psychology of Music, 19, 3–21.
53.
SwanwickK. (1988). Music, mind and education. London and New York: Routledge.
54.
SwanwickK. (1994). Musical knowledge: Intuition, analysis and music education. London: Routledge.
55.
TaetleL.CutiettaR. (2002) Learning theories as roots of current musical practice and research. In ColwellRichardson (Eds.), The new handbook of research on music teaching and learning (pp. 279–298). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56.
TorffB. (2002). A comparative review of human ability theory. In ColwellRichardson (Eds.), The new handbook of research on music teaching and learning (pp. 509–521). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57.
TriantafyllakiA. (2010). Performance teachers’ identity and professional knowledge in advanced music teaching, Music Education Research, 12(1), 71–87.
58.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
59.
WesterlundH. (2006). Garage rock bands: A future model for developing musical expertise?International Journal of Music Education, 24(2), 119–125.
