The Form of Performance: Analyzing Pattern Distribution in Select Recordings of Chopin's Mazurka Op. 24 No. 2

Abstract

Performances of the same piece can differ from one another in innumerable ways and for many different reasons. The aim of the current study is to analyze the timing and dynamic patterns of a large sample of performances in order to explore the musical reasons for both the occurrence of such patterns and the differences in their location and characteristics. The investigation focuses on twenty-nine performances of Chopin's Mazurka Op. 24 No. 2, which features clear four-bar phrases and correspondingly consistent sectional units, but which also has characteristics such as a steady crotchet accompaniment that remain constant throughout. This results in a potential tension between “through-performed” and sectionalized features. In this study we examine the performances accordingly, investigating the relationship between the work's structural and thematic characteristics on the one hand and the timing and dynamic characteristics of performances on the other. Following this, we narrow our investigation of these and other features by undertaking a comparative analysis of three recordings by the same performer, Artur Rubinstein. A toolkit of methods is employed, including an approach that has been little used for this purpose: Self-Organizing Maps. This method enables the systematic analysis and comparison of different performances by identifying recurrent expressive patterns and their location within the respective performances. The results show that, in general, the structure of the performed music emerges from and is defined by the performance patterns. Particular patterns occur in a range of contexts, and this may reflect the structural and/or thematic status of the locations in question. Whereas the performance patterns at section ends seem to be most closely related to the large-scale structural context, however, those within some sections apparently arise from typical features of the mazurka genre. Performances by the same performer over a 27-year span are characterized by striking similarities as well as differences on a global level in terms of the patterns themselves as well as the use thereof.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chaffin

Lemieux

A. F.

Chen

(2007). It's different each time I play: Variability in highly prepared musical performance. Music Perception, 24, 455–472.

Clarke

E. F.

(1988). Generative principles in music performance. In Sloboda

J.A.

(Ed.), Generative processes in music: The psychology of performance, improvisation, and composition (pp. 1–26). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Clarke

E. F.

(1995). Expression in performance: Generativity, perception and semiosis. In Rink

(Ed.), The practice of performance (pp. 21–54). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cook

(2009). Squaring the circle: Phrase arching in recordings of Chopin's mazurkas. Musica Humana, 1, 5–28.

Cook

Sapp

(2008). Une pure coïncidence? Joyce Hatto et les Mazurkas de Chopin, trans. Jean-François Cornu. L'étincelle: Le journal de la création à l'IRCAM, 3, 19–21.

Friberg

Battel

G.U.

(2002). Structural communication. In Parncutt

McPherson

G.E.

(Eds.), The science and psychology of music performance: Creative strategies for teaching and learning (pp. 199–218). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gabrielsson

(1987). Once again: The theme from Mozart's piano sonata in A major (K.331). In Gabrielsson

(Ed.), Action and perception in rhythm and music (pp. 81–103). Stockholm: Royal Swedish Academy of Music.

Gjerdingen

R.O.

(1988). Shape and motion in the microstructure of song. Music Perception, 6, 35–64.

Juslin

P. N.

(2000). Cue utilization in communication of emotion in music performance: Relating performance to perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1797–1813.

10.

Kohonen

Hynninen

Kangas

Laaksonen

(1996). SOM_PAK: The self-organizing map program package, technical report A31. Helsinki University of Technology, Laboratory of Computer and Information Science, FIN-02150. Espoo, Finland.

11.

Kohonen

(2001). Self-organizing maps (3rd ed.). Berlin, Heidelberg and New York: Springer.

12.

Leech-Wilkinson

(2009). Recordings and histories of performance style. Recordings and histories of performance style. In Cook

Leech-Wilkinson

Clarke

Rink

(Eds.), The Cambridge companion to recorded music (pp. 246–262). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

13.

Lerdahl

Jackendoff

R.A.

(1983). A generative theory of tonal music. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London: MIT Press.

14.

Palmer

(1996). Anatomy of a performance: Sources of musical expression. Music Perception, 13, 433–454.

15.

Palmer

(1997). Music performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 115–138.

16.

Pampalk

Widmer

Chan

(2004). A new approach to hierarchical clustering and structuring of data with self-organizing maps. Intelligent Data Analysis, 8, 131–149.

17.

Réti

(1961). The thematic process in music. New York: Faber and Faber.

18.

Rink

Spiro

Gold

(forthcoming). Motive, gesture and the analysis of performance. In Gritten

King

(Eds.), New perspectives on music and gesture. Farnham: Ashgate.

19.

Sapp

(2007). Comparative analysis of multiple musical performances. In Dixon

Bainbridge

Typke

(Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th international conference on music information retrieval, Vienna, Austria, September 23–27, 2007 (pp. 497–500). Vienna: Österreichische Computer Gesellschaft.

20.

Seashore

C.E.

(1938). Psychology of music. New York: McGraw-Hill.

21.

Shaffer

L.H.

(1981). Performances of Chopin, Bach and Bartók: Studies in motor programming. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 326–376.

22.

Shaffer

L.H.

(1995). Musical performance as interpretation. Psychology of Music, 23, 17–38.

23.

Spiro

Gold

Rink

(2008). Plus ça change: Analyzing performances of Chopin's mazurka op. 24 no. 2. In Miyazaki

Hiraga

Adachi

Nakajima

Tsuzaki

(Eds.), Proceedings of 10th international conference on music perception and cognition (pp. 418–427). Sapporo: ICMPC10.

24.

Sundberg

Friberg

Frydén

(1991). Common secrets of musicians and listeners—An analysis-by-synthesis study of musical performance. In Howell

West

Cross

(Eds.), Representing Musical Structure (pp. 161–197). London: Academic Press.

25.

Todd

(1985). A model of expressive timing in tonal music. Music Perception 3/1, 33–58.