Listeners attribute a positive or negative value to music. This aesthetic experience is known to be observable over the individuals’ entire life span, from early childhood to old age, and in every culture. It is then often concluded that such an aesthetic experience constitutes part of the human nature, having an important biological foundation. This assumption leads to the question of how aesthetic experience of music originated in the biological evolution. In this paper, we will explore this question in the light of evolutionary psychology, cognitive science, and systems neuroscience. After reviewing the existing proposals, we conclude that the explanation of the origin of aesthetic experience in music is likely to involve a more heterogeneous set of biological mechanisms than what is often assumed.
BalkwillL.-L., & ThompsonW. F. (1999). A cross-cultural investigation of the perception of emotion in music: psychophysical and cultural cues. Music Perception, 17, 43–64.
4.
BerlyneD. E. (1971). Aesthetics and Psychobiology.New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
5.
BessonM., & SchönD. (2003). Comparison between language and music. In PeretzI., & ZatorreR. (eds), The Cognitive Neuroscience of Music (pp. 269–93). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
6.
BloodA. J., & ZatorreR. J. (2001). Intensely pleasurable responses to music correlate with activity in brain regions implicated in reward and emotion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 11818–23.
7.
BloodA. J., ZatorreR. J., BermudezP., & EvansA. C. (1999). Emotional responses to pleasant and unpleasant music correlate with activity in paralimbic brain regions. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 382–87.
8.
BratticoE. (2006). Cortical Processing of Musical Pitch as Reflected by Behavioural and Electrophysiological Evidence.Helsinki: Yliopistopaino.
9.
BratticoE., JacobsenT., De BaeneW., NakaiN., & TervaniemiM. (2003). Electrical brain responses to descriptive vs. evaluative judgments of music. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 999, 155–57.
10.
BratticoE., NäätänenR., & TervaniemiM. (2001). Context effects on pitch perception in musicians and non-musicians: Evidence from ERP recordings. Music Perception, 19, 1–24.
11.
BratticoE., PallesenK.J., VaryaginaO., BaileyC., AnourovaI., JärvenpääM., EerolaT., & TervaniemiM. (2008). Neural Discrimination of Nonprototypical Chords in Music Experts and Laymen: An MEG Study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. Oct. 14 Epub ahead of print.
ConradC., NiessH., JauchK.-W., BrunsC. J., HartlW. H., & WelkerL. (2007). Overture for growth hormone: Requiem for interleukin-6?, Critical Care Medicine, 35, 2709–13.
14.
CosmidesL., & ToobyJ. (2000). Evolutionary psychology and the emotions. In LewisM., & Haviland-JonesJ. M. (eds), Handbook of Emotions (pp. 91–115). New York: Guilford.
15.
CrossI. (2003). Music, cognition, culture, and evolution. In PeretzI., & ZatorreR. J. (eds), The Cognitive Neuroscience of Music (pp. 42–56). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
DarwinC. (1859). On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection (Murray, London).
17.
DarwinC. (1871). The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex.London: Murray.
18.
DissanayakeE. (2007). What art is and what art does: An overview of contemporary evolutionary hypotheses. In MartindaleC., LocherP., & PetrovV. (eds), Evolutionary and Neurocognitive Approaches to Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts.Amityville, NY: Baywood, pp. 1–14.
19.
DissanayakeE. (2000). Antecedents of the temporal arts in early mother-infant interaction. In WallinN. L., & MerkerB., & BrownS. (eds), The Origins of Music (pp. 389–410). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
DrakeC., & BertrandD. (2003). The quest for universals in temporal processing in music. In PeretzI., & ZatorreR. J. (eds), The Cognitive Neuroscience of Music (pp. 21–31). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
DraynaD., ManichaikulA., de LangeM., SniederH., & SpectorT. (2001). Genetic correlates of musical pitch recognition in humans. Science, 291, 1969–72.
22.
FechnerG. T. (1876). Vorschule der Aesthetik [Experimental Aesthetics; “Pre-school” of aesthetics].Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.
23.
FreemanW. (2000). A neurobiological role of music in social bonding. In WallinN. L., & MerkerB., & BrownS. (eds), The Origins of Music (pp. 411–24). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24.
FujiokaT., TrainorL. J., RossB., KakigiR., & PantevC. (2004). Musical training enhances automatic encoding of melodic contour and interval structure. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1010–21.
25.
GeissmannT. (2000). Gibbon songs and human music from an evolutionary perspective. In WallinN. L., & MerkerB., & BrownS. (eds), The Origins of Music (pp. 103–24). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
26.
GouldS. J. (1989). Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History.New York: W. W. Norton.
27.
GouldS. J. (2002). The Structure of Evolutionary Theory.Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
28.
GreweO., NagelF., KopiezR., & AltenmüllerE. (2005). How does music arouse “chills”? Investigating strong emotions, combining psychological, physiological, and psychoacoustical methods. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1060, 446–49.
29.
Griffiths. (2004). “When the feeling's gone”: A selective loss of musical emotion. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 75, 344–45.
30.
HalderG., CallaertsP., GehringW.J.1995. Induction of ectopic eyes by targeted expression of the eyeless gene in Drosophilia. Science267, 1788–92.
31.
HannonE. E., & TrainorL. J. (2007). Music acquisition: Effects of enculturation and formal training on development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 466–72.
32.
HauserM. D. (2000). The sound and the fury: Primate vocalizations as reflections of emotion and thought. In WallinN. L., & MerkerB., & BrownS. (eds), The Origins of Music (pp. 77–102). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33.
HauserM. D., & McDermottJ. (2003). The evolution of the music faculty: A comparative perspective. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 663–68.
34.
HensonR. N. A., RuggM. D., ShalliceT., JosephsO., & DolanR. J. (1999). Recognition and familiarity in recognition memory: An event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study. The Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 3962–72.
35.
HöfelL., & JacobsenT. (2007). Electrophysiological indices of processing symmetry and aesthetics: a result of judgment categorization or judgment report?Journal of Psychophysiology, 21, 9–21.
HuronD. (2003). Is music an evolutionary adaptation? In PeretzI., & ZatorreR. (eds), The Cognitive Neuroscience of Music (pp. 57–75). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
ImbertyM. (2000). The question of innate competencies in musical communication. In WallinN. L., MerkerB., & BrownS. (eds), The Origins of Music (pp. 449–62). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39.
JackendoffR., & LerdahlF. (2006). The capacity for music: What is it, and what's special about it?Cognition, 100, 33–72.
40.
JacobsenT. (2004). The primacy of beauty in judging the aesthetics of objects. Psychological Reports, 94, 1253–1260.
41.
JacobsenT. (2006). Bridging the arts and sciences: A framework for the psychology of aesthetics. Leonardo, 39, 155–162.
42.
JacobsenT., & HöfelL. (2003). Descriptive and evaluative judgment processes: Behavioral and electrophysiological indices of processing symmetry and aesthetics. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 3, 289–99.
43.
JacobsenT., SchubotzR. I., HöfelL., & CramonD. Y. V. (2006). Brain correlates of aesthetic judgment of beauty. NeuroImage, 29, 276–85.
44.
JustusT., & HutslerJ. J. (2005). Fundamental issues in the evolutionary psychology of music: Assessing innateness and domain specificity. Music Perception, 23, 1–27.
45.
KameokaA., & KuriyagawaM. (1969). Consonance theory Part I: Consonance of dyads. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 45(6), 1451–59.
46.
KoelschS., & SiebelW. A. (2005). Towards a neural basis of music perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 578–84.
47.
KrumhanslC. L. (1997). An exploratory study of musical emotions and psychophysiology. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 336–53.
48.
LederH., BelkeB., OeberstA., & AugustinD. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgements. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 489–508.
49.
LenskiR. E., OfriaC., PennockR. T., & AdamiC. (2003). The evolutionary origin of complex features. Nature, 423, 139–44.
50.
LynnR., WilsonR. G., & GaultA. (1989). Simple musical tests as measures of Spearman's g. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 25–8.
51.
McDermottJ., & HauserM. D. (2005). Probing the evolutionary origins of music perception. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1060, 6–16.
52.
MâcheF.-B. (2000). The necessity of and problems with a universal musicology. In WallinN. L., MerkerB., & BrownS. (eds), The Origins of Music (pp. 473–79). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
53.
Maynard SmithJ., BurianR., KauffmanS., AlberchP., CampbellJ., GoodwinB., LandeR., RaupD., & WolpertL. (1985). Developmental Contraints and Evolution. The Quarterly Review of Biology60: 265–87.
54.
MeyerL. B. (1956). Emotion and Meaning in Music.Chicago – London: The University of Chicago Press.
55.
MilinskiM. (2003). Perfumes. In VolandE., & GrammerK. (eds), Evolutionary Aesthetics (pp. 325–39). Berlin - Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
56.
MillerG. (2000). Evolution of human music through sexual selection. In WallinN. L., MerkerB., & BrownS. (eds), The Origins of Music (pp. 329–60). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57.
MithenS. (2005). The Singing Neanderthals: The Origins of Music, Language, Mind and Body.London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
58.
MonahanJ. L., MurphyS. T., & ZajoncR. B. (2000). Subliminal mere exposure: Specific, general, and diffuse effects. Psychological Science, 11, 462–66.
59.
MooreB. C. J. (1989). An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing.London - San Diego – New York: Academic Press.
60.
MünteT. F., AltenmüllerE., & JänckeL. (2002). The musician's brain as a model of neuroplasticity. Nature Review Neuroscience, 3, 473–78.
61.
NettlB. (2000). An ethnomusicologist contemplates universals in musical sound and musical culture. In WallinN. L., MerkerB., & BrownS. (eds), The Origins of Music (pp. 463–72). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
62.
PankseppJ., & BernatzkyG. (2002). Emotional sounds and the brain: The neuro-affective foundations of musical appreciation. Behavioral Processes, 60, 133–55.
63.
PantevC., EngelienA., CandiaV., & ElbertT. (2003). Representational cortex in musicians. In PeretzI., & ZatorreR. J. (eds), The Cognitive Neuroscience of Music (pp. 383–95). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
64.
PantevC., RobertsL. E., SchultzM., EngelienA., & RossB. (2001). Timbre-specific enhancement of auditory cortical representations in musicians. NeuroReport, 12, 169–74.
65.
PattersonR. D., UppenkampS., JohnsrudeI. S., & GriffithsT. D. (2002). The processing of temporal pitch and melody information in auditory cortex. Neuron, 36, 767–76.
66.
PeretzI. (2003). Brain specialization for music: New evidence from congenital amusia. In PeretzI., & ZatorreR. (eds), The Cognitive Neuroscience of Music (pp. 192–203). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
67.
PeretzI. (2006). The nature of music from a biological perspective. Cognition, 100, 1–32.
68.
PeretzI., BratticoE., & TervaniemiM. (2005). Abnormal electrical brain responses to pitch in congenital amusia. Annals of Neurology, 58, 478–82.
69.
PeretzI., & ColtheartM. (2003). Modularity of music processing. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 688–91.
70.
PeretzI., CummingsS., & DubæM. P. (2007). The genetics of congenital amusia (tone deafness): A family aggregation study. American Journal of Human Genetics, 81, 582–88.
71.
PeretzI., & ZatorreR. (eds). (2003). The Cognitive Neuroscience of Music.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
72.
PinkerS. (1994). The Language Instinct — The New Science of Language and Mind.London – New York: Penguin Group.
73.
PlompR., & LeveltJ. M. (1965). Tonal consonance and critical bandwidth. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 38, 549–60.
74.
RauscheckerJ. P. (1999). Auditory cortical plasticity: A comparison with other sensory systems. Trends in Neurosciences, 22, 74–80.
SacksO. (2006). The power of Music. Brain, 129, 2528–32.
77.
SchererK. R., & ZentnerM. R. (2001). Emotional effects of music: Production rules. In JuslinP. N., & SlobodaJ. A. (eds), Music and Emotion: Theory and Research (pp. 361–92). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
78.
SchneiderP., SchergM., DoschH. G., SpechtH. J., GutschalkA., & RuppA. (2002). Morphology of Heschl's gyrus reflects enhanced activation in the auditory cortex of musicians. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 688–94.
79.
SmithC. U. (2005). Evolutionary neurobiology and aesthetics. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 48, 17–30.
80.
SteinbeisN., KoelschS., & SlobodaJ. A. (2006). The role of harmonic expectancy violations in musical emotions: Evidence from subjective, physiological, and neural responses. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 1380–93.
81.
TafuriJ. (2006). Processes and teaching strategies in musical improvisation with children. In DeliègeI., & WigginsG. A. (eds), Musical Creativity — Multidisciplinary Research in Theory and Practice (pp. 134–57), Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
82.
TerhardtE. (1974). Pitch, consonance, and harmony. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 55, 1061–69.
83.
TervaniemiM., IlvonenT., KarmaK., AlhoK., & NäätänenR. (1997). The musical brain: Brain waves reveal the neurophysiological basis of musicality in human subjects. Neuroscience Letters, 226, 1–4.
ThainM., & HickmanM. (2004). Dictionary of Biology.London, New York: Penguin Reference (11th edition).
86.
ThornhillR. (2003). Darwinian aesthetics informs traditional aesthetics. In VolandE., & GrammerK. (eds), Evolutionary Aesthetics (pp. 9–35). Berlin - Heidelberg - New York: Springer-Verlag.
87.
ToddP. (2000). Simulating the evolution of musical behavior. In WallinN. L., & MerkerB., & BrownS. (eds), The Origins of Music (pp. 361–88). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
88.
TrainorL. J., TsangC. D., & CheungV. H. W. (2002). Preference for sensory consonance in 2– and 4–month-old infants. Music Perception, 20, 187–94.
89.
TrainorL. J. (2006). Innateness, learning, and the difficulty of determing whether music is an evolutionary adaptation. Music Perception, 24, 105–9.
90.
TrehubS. (2000). Human processing predispositions and musical universals. In WallinN. L., MerkerB., & BrownS. (eds), The Origins of Music (pp. 427–48). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
91.
TrehubS. (2003). Musical predispositions in infancy: An update. In PeretzI., & ZatorreR. J. (eds), The Cognitive Neuroscience of Music (pp. 3–20). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
92.
TrehubS. E., & HannonE. E. (2006). Infant music perception: Domain-general or domain-specific mechanisms?, Cognition, 100, 73–99.
93.
TrehubS. E., SchellenbergE. G., & KamenetskyS. B. (1999). Infants’ and adults’ perception of scale structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 965–75.
94.
UjhelyiM. (2000). Social organization as a factor in the origins of language and music. In WallinN. L., & MerkerB., & BrownS. (eds), The Origins of Music (pp. 125–34). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
95.
VartanianO., & GoelV. (2004). Neuroanatomical correlates of aesthetic preference for paintings. NeuroReport, 15, 893–97.
WagnerG. P., & AltenbergL. (1996). Perspective: Complex Adaptations and the Evolution of Evolvability. Evolution50: 967–76.
98.
WallinN. L., MerkerB., & BrownS. (2000). The Origins of Music.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
99.
WrightC. I., MartisB., SchwartzC. E., ShinL. M., FischerH., McMullinK., & RauchS. L. (2003). Novelty responses and differential effects of order in amygdala, substantia innominata, and inferior temporal cortex. NeuroImage, 18, 660–69.
100.
öhmanA., FlyktA., & LundqvistD. (2000). Unconscious emotion: Evolutionary perspectives, psychophysiological data and neuropsychological mechanisms. In LaneR. D., & NadelL. (eds), Cognitive Neuroscience of Emotion (pp. 296–327). Oxford - New York: Oxford University Press.
101.
ZatorreR. J., BelinP., & PenhuneV. B. (2002). Structure and function of auditory cortex: Music and speech. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 37–46.
