We report an investigation of humans' musical learning ability using a novel musical system. We designed an artificial musical system based on the Bohlen-Pierce scale, a scale very different from Western music. Melodies were composed from chord progressions in the new scale by applying the rules of a finite-state grammar. After exposing participants to sets of melodies, we conducted listening tests to assess learning, including recognition tests, generalization tests, and subjective preference ratings. In Experiment 1, participants were presented with 15 melodies 27 times each. Forced choice results showed that participants were able to recognize previously encountered melodies and generalize their knowledge to new melodies, suggesting internalization of the musical grammar.
Preference ratings showed no differentiation among familiar, new, and ungrammatical melodies. In Experiment 2, participants were given 10 melodies 40 times each. Results showed superior recognition but unsuccessful generalization. Additionally, preference ratings were significantly higher for familiar melodies. Results from the two experiments suggest that humans can internalize the grammatical structure of a new musical system following exposure to a sufficiently large set size of melodies, but musical preference results from repeated exposure to a small number of items. This dissociation between grammar learning and preference will be further discussed.
AslinR.N.SaffranJ.R.NewportE.L. (1998). Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 9 (4), 321–24.
2.
BerlyneD. E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiohgy. New York: Applecon-Century-Crofts.
3.
BessonM.FaïtaF. (1995). An event-related potential (ERP) study of musical expectancy: Comparison of musicians with nonmusicians. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 1278–96.
4.
BigandE.MadurellF.TillmannB.PineauM. (1999). Effect of global structure and temporal organization on chord processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25 (1), 184–97.
5.
BigandE.TillmannB.PoulinB.D'AdamoD.A.MadurellF. (2001). The effect of harmonic context on phoneme monitoring in vocal music. Cognition, 81, B11–B20.
6.
BharuchaJ.J.StoeckigK. (1986). Reaction time and musical expectancy: Priming of chords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 12, 4, 403–10.
7.
BornsteinR. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research 1968–1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265–89.
8.
BornsteinR. F.D'AgostinoP. R. (1992). Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63 (4), 545–52.
9.
BornsteinR. F.D'AgostinoP. R. (1994). The attribution and discounting of perceptual fluency: Preliminary tests of a perceptual fluency/attributional model of the mere exposure effect. Social Cognition, 12, 103–28.
10.
CastellanoM.A.BharuchaJ.J.KrumhanslC.L. (1984) Tonal hierarchies in the music of north India. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113 (3), 394–412.
11.
CreelS.C.NewportE.L.AslinR.N. (2004). Distant melodies: Statistical learning of nonadjacent dependencies in tone sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 30 (5), 1119–30.
12.
DienesZ.Longuet-HigginsC. (2004). Can musical transformations be implicidy learned?Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal28 (4), 531–58.
13.
GomezR.L.SchvaneveldtR.W. (1994). What is learned from artificial grammars? Transfer tests of simple association. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 20 (2), 396–410.
14.
HuronD. (2006). Sweet anticipation: Music and the psychology of expectation. MIT Press.
15.
JustusT. C.BharuchaJ. J. (2001). Modularity in musical processing: The automaticity of harmonic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27 (4), 1000–11.
16.
LerdahlF.JackendoffR. (1983). A generative theory of tonal music. MIT Press.
17.
LevitinD. J.RogersS.E. (2005). Absolute pitch: Perception, coding, and controversies. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 26–33.
18.
LouiP.Grent-‘t-JongT.TorpeyD.WoldorffM.G. (2005). Effects of attention on the neural processing of harmonic syntax in Western music. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 678–87.
19.
LouiR.WesselD.L.KamC.L. Hudson (2007). Humans rapidly learn grammatical structure in a new musical scale. In review.
20.
KoelschS.GunterT.C.FriedendA.D.SchrögerE. (2000). Brain indices of music processing: “Non-musicians” are musical. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 520–41.
21.
KrumhanslC.L. (1987). General properties of musical pitch systems: Some psychological considerations. In SundbergJ. (ed), Harmony and Tonality, Stockholm: Royal Swedish Academy of Music, publ. no. 54.
22.
KrumhanslC.L. (1990). Cognitive Foundations of Musical Pitch. NY: Oxford University Press.
23.
KrumhanslC.L.ToivanenP.EerolaT.ToiviainenP.JarvinenT.LouhivuoriJ. (2000). Cross-cultural music cognition: Cognitive methodology applied to North Sami yoiks. Cognition, 14, 76(1), 13–58.
24.
KuhnG.DienesZ. (2005). Implicit learning of nonlocal musical rules: Implicidy learning more then chunks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31 (6), 1417–32.
25.
KuhnG.DienesZ. (2007). Learning non-local dependencies. Cognition, in press.
26.
MeyerL. (1956). Emotion and meaning in music. University of Chicago Press.
27.
MeyerM. (1903). Experimental studies in the psychology of music. The American Journal of Psychology, 14(3/4), 192–214.
28.
MindaJ. P.SmithJ. D. (2001). Prototypes in category learning: The effects of category size, category structure, and stimulus complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, Cognition, 27 (3), 775–99.
29.
PeretzI.GaudreauD.BonnelA. (1998). Exposure effects on music preference and recognition. Memory & Cognition, 26 (5), 884–902.
30.
ReberA. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118 (3), 219–35.
31.
SaffranJ.R.AslinR.N.NewportE.L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month old infants. Science, 274, 1926–28.
32.
SaffranJ.R.JohnsonE.K.AslinR.N.NewportE.L. (1999). Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults. Cognition, 70, 27–52.
33.
SchellenbergE. G.TrehubS. E. (1996). Natural musical intervals: Evidence from infant listeners. Psychological Science, 7 (5), 272–77.
34.
TanS.L.SpackmanM.P.PeasleeC.L. (2006). The effects of repeated exposure on liking and judgment of intact and patchwork compositions. Music Perception, 23 (5), 407–21.
35.
TenenbaumJ. B.GriffithsT. L. (2001). Generalization, similarity, and Bayesian inference. Behavioural & Brain Sciences, 24(4), 629–40; discussion 652–791.
36.
TillmannB.BharuchaJ. J. (2002). Effect of harmonic relatedness on the detection of temporal asynchronies. Perception & Psychophysics, 64 (4), 640–49.
37.
TillmannB.BigandE.EscoffierN.LalitteP. (2006). The influence of musical relatedness on timbre discrimination. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18 (3), 343–458.
38.
TillmannB.McAdamsS. (2004). Implicit learning of musical timbre sequences: Statistical regularities confronted with acoustical (dis)similarities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30 (5), 1131–42.
39.
TrainorL.TrehubS. E. (1994). Key membership and implied harmony in Western tonal music: Developmental perspectives. Perception & Psychophysics, 56 (2), 125–32.
40.
TramoM. J. (2001). Enhanced: Music of the hemispheres. Science, 291, 54–6.
41.
ZajoncR.B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2, Pt. 2), 1–27.
42.
ZajoncR. B. (2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 224–28.
43.
ZakiS. R.NosofskyR. M.StantonR. D.CohenA. L. (2003). Prototype and exemplar accounts of category learning and attentional allocation: A reassessment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 29 (6), 1160–73.
44.
ZicarelliD. (1998). An extensible real-time signal processing environment for Max. Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference, 1998.
