BerlyneD. E. (1974). Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics: Steps Towards an Objective Psychology of Aesthetic Appreciation. Washington: Hemisphere Publishing Co.
3.
BodenM. A. (1990). The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. London: Weidenfield and Nicholson.
4.
ConklinD.WittenI. H. (1995). Multiple viewpoint systems for music prediction. Journal of New Music Research, 24 (1), 51–73.
5.
DownieJ. S. (2003). Music information retrieval. In CroninB. (ed), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, volume 37 (pp. 295–340). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
6.
HewlettW. B.Selfridge-FieldE. (eds.) (1998). Melodic Similarity. In Computing in Musicology, Number 11. Cambridge, MA: CCARH and MIT Press.
7.
HewlettW. B.Selfridge-FieldE. (eds.) (2004). Music Query: Methods, Models, and User Studies. In Computing in Musicology, Number 13. Cambridge, MA: CCARH and MIT Press.
8.
HuronD. (2001). Tone and voice: A derivation of the rules of voice-leading from perceptual principles. Music Perception, 19(1, 1–64.
9.
HuronD. (2006). Exploring how music works its wonders. Cerebrum: The Dana Forum on Brain Science, 8 (4), 1–6.
10.
JustusT.HutslerJ. J. (2005). Fundamental issues in the evolutionary psychology of music: Assessing innateness and domain specificity. Music Perception, 23(1, 1–27.
11.
KrumhanslC. L. (1990). Cognitive Foundations of Musical PitchOxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
LerdahlF.JackendoffR. (1983). A Generative Theory of Tonal Music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13.
ManzaraL. C.WittenI. H.JamesM. (1992). On the entropy of music: An experiment with Bach chorale melodies. Leonardo, 2(1, 81–8.
14.
NarmourE. (1990). The Analysis and Cognition of Basic Melodic Structures: The Implication-realisation Model. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
NorthA. C.HargreavesD. J. (1997). Experimental aesthetics and everyday music listening. In HargreavesD. J.NorthA. C. (eds), The social psychology of music (pp. 84–103). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
16.
OrioN. (2006). Music retrieval: A tutorial and review. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 1(1, 1–90.
17.
PearceM. T.ConklinD.WigginsG. A. (2005). Methods for combining statistical models of music. In WiilU. K. (ed), Computer Music Modelling and Retrieval (pp. 295–312). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Verlag.
18.
PearceM. T.WigginsG. A. (2004). Improved methods for statistical modelling of monophonic music. Journal of New Music Research, 33(4, 367–85.
19.
PinkerS.JackendoffR. (2005). The faculty of language: What's special about it? Cognition, 95(2, 201–36.
20.
RitchieG. (2003). The Linguistic Analysis of Jokes. London/New York: Routledge.
21.
SaffranJ. R.JohnsonE. K.AslinR. N.NewportE. L. (1999). Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults. Cognition, 70(1, 27–52.
22.
SaltonG. (1983). Introduction to modern information retrieval. New York: McGraw-Hill.
23.
UitdenbogerdA. L. (2002). Music Information Retrieval Technology. Doctoral dissertation, RMIT University of Melbourne, Australia.
24.
von HippelP. T. (2002). Melodic-expectation rules as learned heuristics. In StevensC.BurnhamD.SchubertE.RenwickJ. (eds), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition (pp. 315–17). Adelaide, Australia: Causal Productions.
25.
von HippelP. T.HuronD. (2000). Why do skips precede reversals? The effects of tessitura on melodic structure. Music Perception, 18(1, 59–85.
26.
VosP. G.TroostJ. M. (1989). Ascending and descending melodic intervals: Statistical findings and their perceptual relevance. Music Perception, 6(4, 383–96.
27.
WigginsG. A. (2006). A preliminary framework for description, analysis and comparison of creative systems. Journal of Knowledge Based Systems, 19(7, 449–58.