This study explores the issue of mutual understanding between musicians in improvised performance. It attempts to describe how improvising musicians indicate to each other that they have grasped each other's expressive intentions in order to collaboratively negotiate common expressive trajectories. The process of moment-to-moment monitoring of shared understanding is referred to as “grounding”. Shared knowledge, beliefs and assumptions provide an important basis for grounding and grounding in turn reinforces a “common ground” of shared representation. Based on research on “grounding” in conversational exchange and on studies of nonverbal mother-infant interaction, some possible indices of “grounding” in musical interaction are discussed. Grounding in conversational exchange is attained through acknowledgement, relevance and sustained attention. It is proposed here that displays of mutual understanding between musicians are rooted in a collaboratively negotiated embodied phrasing through which repetition, mirroring and matching, punctuation, and completion and synchronisation might constitute the musical basis for grounding.
AshleyR. (2002). Do[n't] change a hair for me: the art of jazz rubato. Music perception, 19(3), 311–332.
2.
AuerP., Couper-KuhlenE., & MüllerF. (1999). Language in time: The rhythm and tempo of spoken interaction.New York: Oxford University Press
3.
BakhtinM. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M.M. Bakhtin.HolquistM. E. (ed). C. Emerson, & M. Holquist (trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
4.
BarthesR. (1968). La mort de l'auteur. Mantæia (5), 12–16.
5.
BatesonG. (1972/1955). Steps to an ecology of mind.New York: Ballantine.
6.
BeckerH.S. (2000). The etiquette of improvisation. Mind, culture and activity, 7(3), 171–76.
7.
BerlinerP. F. (1994). Thinking in jazz: The infinite art of improvisation.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
8.
BirdwhistellR. L. (1970). Kinesics and context.Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
9.
BourdieuP. (1990). The logic of practice.Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
10.
BourdieuP. (1984). Haute couture et haute culture. In BourdieuP., Questions de sociologie (pp. 196–206). Paris: Minuit
11.
Carroll-PhelanB., & HampsonP.J. (1996). Multiple components of the perception of musical sequences: A cognitive neuroscience analysis and some implications for auditory imagery. Music perception, 13, 517–61.
12.
ClarkH.H., & MarshallC.R., (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In JoshiA. K., WebberB. L., & SagI. A. (eds), Elements of discourse understanding (pp 10–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
ClarkH. H., & BrennanS. A. (1991). Grounding in communication. In ResnickL.B., LevineJ.M., & TeasleyS.D. (eds), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127–49). Washington: APA Books.
CondonW. S. (1986). Communication: Rhythm and structure. In EvansJ. R., and ClynesM. (eds), Rhythm in psychological, linguistic and musical processes (pp. 55–78). Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas Publisher.
16.
CooperR., & AslinR. (1990). Preference for infant-directed speech in the first month after birth. Child development, 61, 1584–95.
17.
DavidsonJ. (1993). Visual perception of performance manner in the movements of solo musicians. Psychology of music, 21, 103–13.
18.
DelavenneA., GratierM., DevoucheE., & Apter-DanonG. (this issue). Phrasing and fragmented time in “pathological” mother-infant vocal interaction.
19.
DeliègeI. (1987). Grouping conditions in listening to music: A approach to Lerdahl and Jackendoff's grouping preference rules. Music perception, 4, 325–60.
20.
DeliègeI., & El AhmadiA. (1990). Mechanisms of cue extraction in musical groupings: A study of perception on Sequenza VI for viola by Luciano Berio. Psychology of music, 18, 18–44.
21.
DemanyL., Mc KenzieB., & VurpillotE. (1977). Rhythm perception in early infancy. Nature, 266, 718–19.
22.
DissanayakeE. (2000). Art and intimacy: How the arts began.Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
23.
DonaldM. (2001). A mind so rare: the evolution of human consciousness.New York: Norton.
24.
DurantiA., & BurrellK. (2004). Jazz improvisation: A search for hidden harmonies and a unique self, Ricerche di psicologia, 3, 71–101.
25.
EricksonF. (1982). Classroom discourse as improvisation: Relationships between academic task structure and social participation structure in lessons. In WilkinsonL.C. (ed), Communicating in the classroom (pp. 153–81). NY: Academic Press.
26.
EricksonF. (1996). Going for the zone: the social and cognitive ecology of teacher-student interaction in classroom conversations. In HicksD. (ed), Discourse, learning, and schooling (pp. 29–62). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
FernaldA. (1989). Intonation and communicative interest in mother's speech to infants: Is the melody the message?Child development, 60, 1497–1510.
28.
FernaldA., TaeschnerT., DunnJ., PapoušekM., de Boisson-BardiesB., & FukuiI. (1989). A cross-language study of prosodic modifications in mothers’ and fathers’ speech to preverbal infants. Journal of child development, 16, 477–501.
29.
FraisseP. (1982). Rhythm and tempo. In DeutschD. (ed), The psychology of music (pp. 149–80). New York: Academic Press.
30.
GoffmanE. (1967). Interaction ritual.Pantheon: New York.
31.
GoffmanE. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience.New York: Harper & Row.
32.
GoodwinC. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers.New York: Academic Press.
33.
GoodwinC. (2002). Time in action. Current Anthropology, 43 (Special issue “Repertoires of Timekeeping in Anthropology”), S19–S35.
34.
GoodwinC. (2003). The semiotic body in its environment. In CouplandJ., & GwynR. (eds), Discourses of the body (pp. 19–42). New York: Palgrave/Macmillan.
35.
GratierM. (2001). Rythmes et appartenances culturelles: Etude acoustique des æchanges vocaux entre mères et bæbæs autochtones et migrants. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Universitæ Renæ Descartes (Paris V).
36.
GratierM. (2003). Expressive timing and interactional synchrony between mothers and infants: cultural similarities, cultural differences, and the immigration experience. Cognitive development, 18, 533–54.
37.
GratierM., & Apter-DanonG. (in press). The musicality of belonging: Repetition and variation in mother-infant interaction. In TrevarthenC., & MallochS. (eds), Communicative musicality.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
GratierM., GreenfieldP.M., & IsaacA. (in press). Tacit communicative style and cultural attunement in classroom interaction. Mind, culture and activity.
39.
GumperzJ. J. (1977). Sociocultural knowledge in conversational inference. In Saville-TroikeM. (ed), Linguistics and anthropology (pp. 191–211). Georgetown University Roundtable on Language and Linguistics. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
40.
GumperzJ.J. (1978). The conversational analysis of interethnic communication. In Lamar RossE. (ed), Interethnic communication (pp. 13–31). Southern Anthropological Society Proceedings No.12. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
41.
GumperzJ.J., KaltmanH., & O'ConnorM. C. (1984). Cohesion in spoken and written discourse: Ethnic style and the transition to literacy. In TannenD. (ed), Coherence in written and spoken discourse (pp. 3–19). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
42.
HallidayM.A.K., & HasanR. (1976). Cohesion in English.London: Longman.
43.
HebdigeD. (1996/1979). Subculture: The meaning of style.New York: Routledge.
44.
HuronD. (2006). Sweet anticipation: Music and the psychology of expectation.Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press
45.
HymesD. (1981). “In vain I tried to tell you”: Essays in Native-American ethnopoetics.Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
46.
ImbertyM. (1979). Entendre la musique: Sæmantique psychologique de la musique (tome 1).Paris: Dunod.
47.
ImbertyM. (1981). Les æcritures du temps: Sæmantique psychologique de la musique (tome 2).Paris: Dunod.
48.
ImbertyM. (2005). La musique creuse le temps. De Wagner à Boulez: Musique, psychologie, psychanalyse.Paris: LHarmattan.
49.
IyerV. (1998). Microstructures of feel, macrostructures of sound: Embodied cognition in West African and African-American musics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.
50.
IyerV. (2002). Embodied mind, situated cognition, and expressive microtiming in African-American music. Music perception, 19 (3), 387–414.
51.
JusczykP.W., & KrumhanslC.L. (1993). Pitch and rhythmic patterns affecting infant's sensitivity to musical phrase structure. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance, 19, 627–40.
52.
KeenanE. (1971). Two kinds of presuppositions in natural language. In FillmoreC., & LangendoenT. (eds), Studies in linguistic semantics (pp. 45–54). New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
53.
KeilC. (1994). Motion and feeling through music. In KeilC., & FeldS. (eds), Music grooves (pp. 53–76). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
54.
KendonA. (1981). Nonverbal communication, interaction, and gesture.The Hague: Mouton.
55.
KonopczynskiG. (2005). Les enjeux de la voix. In CastarèdeM.-F, & KonopczynskiG. (eds), Au commencement ætait la voix (pp. 33–50). Ramonville St-Agne: Editions Erès.
56.
KristevaJ. (1986). Word, dialogue, and the novel. In MoiT. (ed), The Kristeva reader (pp. 35–61). New York: Columbia University Press.
57.
KrumhanslC. L. (1996). A perceptual analysis of Mozart's Piano Sonata K. 282: Segmentation, tension and musical ideas. Music perception, 13(3), 401–32.
58.
KrumhanslC. L., & SchenckD. L. (1997). Can dance reflect the structural and expressive qualities of music? A perceptual experiment on Balanchine's choreography of Mozart's Divertimento No.15. Musicae scientiae, 1, 63–85.
59.
KrumhanslC. L., & JusczykP. W. (1990). Infants’ perception of phrase structure in music. Psychological science, 1 (1), 70–73.
60.
KühlO. (2006). The semiotic gesture. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Music and Gesture, RNCM, Manchester, UK (20-23 July 2006).
61.
LabovW. (1972). Language in the inner city.Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
62.
LangerS. (1953). Feeling and form: A theory of art developed from Philosophy in a New Key.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
63.
LashleyK. (1951). The problem of serial order in behaviour. In JeffriesL.A. (ed), Cerebral mechanisms in behaviour: The Hixon Symposium (pp. 112–36). New York: Wiley.
64.
LaveJ., & WengerE. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation.Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
65.
LerdahlF., & JackendoffR. (1983). A generative theory of tonal music.Cambridge: MIT Press.
66.
LevinS.R. (1982). Are figures of thought figures of speech? Contemporary perceptions of language: Interdisciplinary dimensions. In, ByrnesH. (ed), Georgetown University Round Table on Language and Linguistics (pp. 112–23). Washington D.C: Georgetown University Press.
67.
LevinsonS.C. (1983). Pragmatics.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68.
LewkoviczD.J. (2000). The development of intersensory temporal perception: An epigenetic systems/limitations view. Psychological bulletin, 126 (2), 281–308.
69.
LynchM. P., OllerD. K., SteffensM. L., & BuderE. H. (1995). Phrasing in prelinguistic vocalizations. Developmental psychobiology, 28 (1), 3–25.
70.
MallochS.N. (1999-2000). Mothers and infants and communicative musicalityMusicæ Scientiæ, Special Issue: Rhythm, musical narrative, and the origins of human communication, 29–57.
71.
MartinJ.G. (1972). Rhythmic (hierarchical) versus serial structure in speech and other behaviour. Psychological review, 79, 487–509.
72.
MasatakaN. (1999). Preference for infant-directed singing in 2–day-old hearing infants of deaf parents. Developmental psychology35, 1001–5
73.
MeyerL.B. (1956). Emotion and meaning in music.Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
PapoušekM., PapoušekH., & SymmesD. (1991). The meanings of melodies in motherese in tone and stress languages. Infant behavior and development, 14, 415–40.
85.
QuinnA. (1982). Figures of speech.Salt Lake City: Gibbs M. Smith.
86.
ReinholdssonP. (1998). Making music together: an interactionist perspective on small-group performance in jazz.Studia Musicologica Upsaliensia, Nova Series 14: Uppsala.
87.
ReppB.A. (1989). Expressive microstructure in music: A preliminary perceptual assessment of fours composers’ pulses. Music perception, 6, 243–47.
88.
RuwetN. (1972). Langage, musique, poæsie.Paris: Editions du Seuil.
89.
SacksH., SchegloffE.A., & JeffersonG. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turntaking for conversation. Language, 50 (4), 696–735.
SawyerK.R. (2003). Group creativity: Music, theatre, collaboration.Mawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
92.
SawyerK. (2005). Music and conversation. In MiellD., MacDonaldR., & HargreavesD.J. (eds), Musical communication (pp. 45–60). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
93.
SchegloffE.A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American journal of sociology, 97(5), 1295–1345.
SchöglerB. (2002). The pulse of communication in improvised jazz duets. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Edinburgh, U.K.
96.
SchutzA. (1962). Collected papers (vol.1). ed. by Arvid Brodersen.The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff
97.
ScollonR. (1982). The rhythmic integration of ordinary talk. In TannenD. (ed), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk (pp. 335–49). Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
98.
SilversteinM. (1997). The improvisational performance of culture in realtime discursive practice. In SawyerR.K. (ed), Creativity in performance (pp. 265–312). Greenwich, CTAblex.
99.
SilversteinM. (1993). Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In LucyJ.A. (ed), Reflexive language (pp. 33–58). New York: Cambridge University Press.
100.
SternD.N. (1999). Vitality contours: The temporal contour of feelings as a basic unit for constructing the infant's social experience. In RochatP. (ed), Early social cognition: Understanding others in the first months of life (pp. 67–90). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
101.
SternD.N. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant: A view from psychoanalysis and developmental psychologyNew York: Basic Books.
102.
SternD.N. (2004). The present moment in psychotherapy and everyday life.New York, NY: Norton.
103.
TannenD. (1984). Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends.Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
104.
TannenD. (1987). Repetition in conversation: toward a poetics of talk. Language, 63, 574–605.
105.
TannenD. (1989). Talking voices: repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse.Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
106.
TemperleyD. (2004). Communicative pressure and the evolution of musical styles. Music perception, 21(3), 313–37.
107.
ThorpeL. A., & TrehubS. E. (1989). Duration illusion and auditory grouping in infancy. Developmental psychology, 25, 122–7.
108.
ToddN. P. M. (1994). The auditory “primal sketch”: a multiscale model of rhythmic grouping. Journal of new music research, 23, 25–70.
109.
TrainorL. J. (1996). Infant preferences for infant-directed versus non-infant-directed play songs and lullabies. Infant behavior and development, 19, 83–92.
110.
TrainorL. J., & AdamsB. (2000). Infants’ and adults’ use of duration and intensity cues in the segmentation of tone patterns. Perception & psychophysics, 62 (2), 333–40.
111.
TrehubS.E. (2003). Toward a developmental psychology of music. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 999(1), 402–13.
112.
TrehubS.E. (2000). Human processing predispositions and musical universals. In WallinN., MerkerB., & BrownS. (eds), The origins of music (pp. 427–48). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
113.
TrehubS. E., BullD., & ThorpeL. A. (1984). Infants’ perception of melodies: the role of melodic contour. Child development, 55(3), 821–30.
114.
TrehubS. E., ThorpeL. A., & MorongielloB. A. (1985). Infants’ perception of melodies: Changes in a single tone. Infant behavior and development, 8(2), 112–23.
115.
TrehubS.E., & ThorpeL.A. (1989). Infants’ perception of rhythm: Categorisation of auditory sequences by temporal structure. Canadian journal of psychology, 43, 217–29.
116.
TrehubS. E., & TrainorL. J. (1998). Singing to infants: Lullabies and playsongs. Advances in infancy research, 12, 43–77.
117.
TrehubS.E., SchellenbergE.G., & KamenetskyS.B. (1999). Infants’ and adults’ perception of scale structure. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance, 25, 965–75.
118.
TrevarthenC. (1993). The self born in intersubjectivity: An infant communicating. In NeisserU. (ed), The perceived self Ecological and interpersonal sources of selfknowledge (pp. 121–73). New York: Cambridge University Press.
119.
TrevarthenC. (1999-2000). Musicality and the intrinsic motive pulse. Musicæ Scientiæ, Special issue: Rhythm, musical narrative, and the origins of human communication, 155–215.
120.
TrevarthenC., & MallochS. (2002). Musicality and music before three: Human vitality and invention shared with pride. Zero-to-Three, 23 (1), 1–22.
121.
TurnerV. (1967). The forest of symbols: Aspects of Ndembu ritual.Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
122.
VinesB.W, KrumhanslC.L., WanderleyM.M., & LevitinD.J. (2006). Cross-modal interactions in the perception of musical performance. Cognition, 101, 80–113.
123.
WanderleyM. M. (2002). Quantitative analysis of non-obvious performer gestures. In WachsmuthI., & SowaT. (eds), Gesture and sign language in human-computer interaction (pp. 241–53). Berlin: Springer.
124.
WanderleyM.M., VinesB.W, MiddletonN., McKayC., & HatchW. (2005). The musical significance of clarinetists’ ancillary gestures: An exploration of the field. Journal of new music research, 34 (1), 97–113.
125.
WeeksP. (1990). Musical time as a practical accomplishment: A change in tempo. Human studies, 13, 323–59.
126.
ZentnerM.R., & KaganJ. (1996). Perception of music by infants. Nature, 383(6595), 29.
