The collaborative processes of jazz improvising are of considerable academic interest as a unique form of creativity. While recent work highlights the utility of interviewing practitioners with the aim of gaining an authoritative view, there is still a need for research to apprehend the gamut of what can be constituted as “jazz”. A previous study has shown how understandings of the music arising in focus group interviews with jazz improvisers are shaped by the need to establish identities (MacDonald and Wilson, 2005; Wilson and MacDonald, 2005). This paper reports on a further series of semi-structured individual interviews with 10 (6 male and 4 female) professional UK jazz musicians on the theme of jazz and musical identity. Specifically, the interviews investigated the social and psychological implications of the collaborative nature of this music. Discursive analysis of the interview transcripts shows how understandings of the music were constructed in relation to identity positions for the speaker. Identity as a jazz musician was negotiated with other individual identities; the relationship between gendered identities and identity as a jazz musician is examined as an instance of how conflict between these identities may allow hegemonic influences to operate. These findings are discussed in relation to current debates in identity theory, and implications for music education.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AielloR. (1994). Music and language: Parallels and contrasts. In AielloR.SlobodaJ. A. (ed.), Musical perceptions (pp. 40–64). New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
AntakiC.WiddicombeS. (1998). Identity as an achievement and as a tool. In AntakiC.WiddicombeS. (eds), Identities in talk (pp. 1–14). London: Sage.
3.
BastienD. T.HostagerT. J. (1988). Jazz as a process of organizational innovation. Communication Research, 15(5, 582–602.
4.
BeckerH. S. (2000). The etiquette of improvisation. Mind Culture and Activity, 7(3, 171–6.
5.
BeckerH. S. (1984). Art Worlds. San Francisco: University of California Press.
6.
BerlinerP. (1994). Thinking in jazz: The infinite art of improvisation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
BilligM. (1997). Rhetorical and discursive analysis: How families talk about the royal family. In HayesN. (ed.), Doing qualitative analysis in psychology (pp. 39–54). Hove: Psychology Press.
8.
CookeM.HorneD. (2002). The Cambridge companion to jazz. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
DaviesB.HarreR. (2001). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. In WetherellM. (ed.), Discourse theory and practice: A reader (pp. 380–99). London: Sage.
10.
DibbenN. (2002). Gender identity and music. In MacDonaldR. A. R.MiellD.HargreavesD. (eds), Musical identities (pp. 117–33). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
EdleyN. (2001). Conversation analysis, discursive psychology and the study of ideology: A response to Susan Speer. Feminism & Psychology, 11(1, 136–40.
12.
EdleyN.WetherellM. (1999). Imagined futures: Young men's talk about fatherhood and domestic life. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 181–94.
FaircloughN. (2003). Analysing Discourse: Text Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
15.
FaircloughN.ChouliarakiL. (1999). Discourse in Late Modernity — Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
16.
FischlinD.HebleA. (2004). The other side of nowhere: Jazz, improvisation and communities in dialogue. Connecticut: Wesleyan University Press.
17.
FolkestadG. (2002). National identity and music. In MacDonaldR. A. R.MiellD.HargreavesD. (eds), Musical identities (pp. 151–62). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
FryG.ButtT.BellR. (2003). Joint Action and Core Construing. In ChiariG.NuzzoM. L. (eds), Psychological constructivism and the social world (pp. 67–78). Milano: FrancoAngeli.
19.
GilbertN.MulkayM. (1984). Opening Pandora's box: A sociological analysis of scientists' discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
GreenB.GallweyW. T. (1987). The inner game of music. London: Pan.
21.
HargreavesD.MacDonaldR. A. R.MiellD. (2002). What are musical identities, and why are they important? In MacDonaldR. A. R.MiellD.HargreavesD. (eds), Musical Identities (pp. 1–21). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
JamesW. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Henry Holt & Co.
23.
KennyB. J.GellrichM. (2002) Improvisation. In ParncuttR.McPhersonG. E. (eds), The science and psychology of musical performance: Creative Strategies for teaching and learning (pp. 117–34). New York: OUP.
24.
KernfeldB. (1997). What to listen for in jazz. New York: Yale University Press.
25.
LewisG. (2004). Improvised music after 1950: Afrological and Eurological perspectives. In FischlinD.HebleA. (eds), The other side of nowhere: Jazz, improvisation and communities in dialogue (pp. 131–63). Connecticut: Wesleyan University Press.
26.
MacDonaldR. A. R.MiellD.HargreavesD. (2002). Musical identities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
MacDonaldR. A. RWilsonG. B. (2005). The musical identities of professional jazz musicians: A focus group investigation. The Psychology of Music, 33(4, 395–417.
28.
MacDonaldR. A. R.MiellD. (2002). Music for individuals with special needs: A catalyst for developments in identity, communication and musical ability. In MacDonaldR. A. R.HargreavesD. J.MiellD. E. (eds), Musical Identities (pp. 163–79). Oxford: Oxford University.
29.
MadiotB. (1996). Identité Sociale et Positionnement dans le Champ Professionel: Le Cas des Musiciens de Jazz. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 32, 33–53.
30.
MiellD.MacDonaldR. A. R.HargreavesD. (2005). Musical Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
MonsonI. (1996). Saying something: Jazz improvisation and interaction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
OliverosP. (2004). Harmonic anatomy: Women in improvisation. In FischlinD.HebleA. (eds), The other side of nowhere: Jazz, improvisation and communities in dialogue (pp. 50–71). Connecticut: Wesleyan University Press.
33.
PomerantzA. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9, 219–29.
34.
PressingJ. (1988). Improvisation: Methods and models. In SlobodaJ. A. (ed.), Generative processes in music: The psychology of performance, improvisation and composition (pp. 129–78). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
35.
PykeK. D. (1996). Class-based masculinities: The interdependence of gender, class, and interpersonal power. Gender & Society, 10(5, 527–49.
36.
SawyerR. K. (1992). Improvisational Creativity: An Analysis of Jazz Performance. Creativity Research Journal, 5(3, 253–63.
37.
SawyerR. K. (2003). Group Creativity: Music, Theater. Collaboration, NJ: Erlbaum.
38.
SawyerR. K. (2004). Group creativity: Musical performance and collaboration. Keynote presentation at The Biannual International Conference of the Society for Education Music and Psychology Research, The Open University, Milton Keynes. April.
39.
SharronA. (1985). The mainstream of consciousness: An interactionist analysis of a phenomenological concept. Symbolic Interaction, 8(1, 47–62.
40.
SpeerS. (2001a). Reconsidering the concept of hegemonic masculinity: Discursive psychology, conversation analysis and participants' orientations. Feminism & Psychology, 11(1, 107–35.
41.
SpeerS. (2001b). Participants' orientations, ideology and the ontological status of hegemonic masculinity: A rejoinder to Nigel Edley. Feminism & Psychology, 11(1, 141–4.
42.
StanyekJ. (2004). Transmissions of an interculture: Pan-African jazz and intercultural improvisation. In FischlinD.HebleA. (eds), The other side of nowhere: Jazz, improvisation and communities in dialogue (pp. 87–131). Connecticut: Wesleyan University Press.
43.
TuckerS. (2004). Playing like a girl: The queer laughter of the feminist improvising group. In FischlinD.HebleA. (eds), The other side of nowhere: Jazz, improvisation and communities in dialogue (pp. 224–44). Connecticut: Wesleyan University Press.
44.
WernerK. (1996). Effortless mastery. New York: Jamey Aebersold.
