This article reports findings from two experiments examining strategies utilized by professional musicians who transcribed a Mozart duet, wherein we explored the possibility that their cognitive processes would be revealed through their transcription strategies on multiple sequential presentations of the same stimulus. We hypothesized that transcription accuracy would be influenced by four factors: Scale degrees, conjunct/disjunct melodic motion, vertical consonance/dissonance, and melody position. In Experiment 1, we reduced the foreground of Mozart's 1783 B-flat Major Duo for Violin and Viola, and used three taped repetitions of the reduction as the experimental stimulus. Participants transcribed the music as the tape played, adding to their transcription during an additional three minutes following each presentation on forms permitting them to see their previous transcriptions, but precluding change of their previous work. Experiment 2 inverted the melodic lines of the stimulus. Our results examined pitch accuracy as the unit of analysis, on each note of the multiple stimuli presentations. Data analysis confirmed the influence of scale degrees, melodic motion and melodic relationship on perceptual accuracy, but showed no influence of vertical consonance/dissonance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AielloR. (1994). Can listening to music be experimentally studied? InAielloR.SlobodaJ.A. (Eds), Musical Perceptions (pp. 273–82). New York and Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
AttneaveFOlsonR. K. (1971) Pitch as a medium: A new approach to psychophysical scaling. American Journal of Psychology, 84(2), 147–66.
4.
BaczewskiP.KillamR. N. (1989). Perception of a musical construct by professional musicians. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 86. Supplement 1, S17.
5.
BalzanoG. J.LieschB. W. (1982). The role of chroma and scalestep in the recognition of musical intervals in and out of context. Psychomusicology, 2(2), 2–31.
6.
BerryW. (1986). Form in music, 2nd Ed., New York: Prentice Hall.
7.
BregmanA. S.PinkerS. (1978). Auditory streaming and the building of timbre. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 32 (1), 19–31.
8.
BregmanA. S. (1994). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
9.
BrownH. (1987). Tonal hierarchies and perceptual context: An experimental study of music behavior. Psychomusicology, 7(1), 77–90.
10.
ButlerD. (1992). The musicians guide to perception and cognition. New York: Schirmer Books.
11.
DeliegeI.Me'lenM.StammersD.CrossI. (1996). Musical schemata in real-time listening. Music Perception, 14(2), 117–60.
12.
DeutschD. (1972). Octave generalization and tune recognition. Perception and Psychophysics.
13.
11(6), 411–22.
14.
DowlingW. J.FujitaniD. S. (1971). Contour, interval-pitch recognition in memory for melodies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49, 524–53.
15.
GregoryA. H. (1990). Listening to polyphonic music. Psychology of Music, 18, 163–70.
16.
HindemithP. (1942). Craft of Musical Composition: I Theory [trans.Mendel]A. New York: Schott.
17.
HuronD. (1993). Note-onset asynchrony in J. S. Bach's two-part inventions. Music Perception, 10(4), 435–44.
18.
KillamR. N. (1984). An effective computer-assisted learning environment for aural skill development. Music Theory Spectrum, 6, 52–61.
19.
KillamR. N.BaczewskiP. (1985). The perception of music by professional musicians: A preliminary case study. Proceedings of the Research Symposium on the Psychology and Acoustics of Music (pp. 71–83), Lawrence, KA: University of Kansas.
20.
KillamR. N.LortonP. V.Jr.SchubertE.D. (1975). Interval recognition: Identification of harmonic and melodic intervals. Journal of Music Theory, 19(2), 212–34.
21.
KillamR. N.LortonP. V.Jr.SchubertE. D. (1976). Perception of triads. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 60. Supplement 1, S42.
22.
KillamR. N.LortonP. V.Jr. (1977). Recognition of tonal sequences derived from traditional triad structures. journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 62. Supplement 1, S3.
23.
KrumhanslC. L.ShepardR. N. (1979). Quantification of the hierarchy of tonal functions within a diatonic context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 579–84.
24.
KrumhanslC. L.KesslerE. J. (1982). Tracing the dynamic changes in perceived tonal organization in a spatial representation of musical keys. Psychological Review, 89(4), 334–68.
25.
LerdahlEJackendofFR. (1983). A Generative theory of tonal music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26.
LochstampforM.L. (1990). The effects of timbre on aural skills: An exploration of the attributes of timbre and spectral parsing for sounds used in aural training. Ph.D. diss., Ohio State University [Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International, 1990].
27.
MarvinE. W. (1997). Tonal/atonal: Cognitive strategies for recognizing transposed melodies. InBakerJ.BeachD.BernardJ. (Eds), Music Theory in Concept and Practice (pp. 21736). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
MeyerL. W. (1996). Commentary. Music Perception, 13(3), 455–83.
30.
PistonW. (1962). Harmony. New York: W. W. Norton and Co.
31.
PlompR.WagenaarW. A.MimpenA. M. (1973). Musical interval recognition with simultaneous tones. Acustica, 29, 101–9.
32.
RatnerL. G. (1980). Classic music: Expression, form, and style. New York: Schirmer Books.
33.
SalzerF. (1962(1960)). Structural Hearing: Tonal Coherence in Music. New York: Dover.
34.
SchenkerH. (1980). Harmony [trans.Borgese]E. M.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
(Original work published 1954).
36.
SchubertE. D. (1980). Hearing: Its Function and Dysfunction. Wien; New York: Springer-Verlag.
37.
SlobodaJ. A.EdworthyJ. (1981). Attending to two melodies at once: The effects of key- relatedness. Psychology of Music, 9(1), 39–43.
38.
SlobodaJ. A.ParkerD. H. (1985). Immediate recall of melodies. InHowellP.CrossI.WestR. (Eds), Musical Structure and Cognition (pp. 143–67). London; Orlando, Florida: Academic Press.
39.
ThostensonM. (1978). Some Characteristics of Pitch Perception as Related to Intervals, Triads and Scales. American Musicology Society and Society for Music Theory, Minneapolis, MN. October 19–22.
40.
WrightJ. K.BregmanA. S. (1987) Auditory stream segregation and the control of dissonance in polyphonic music. InMcAdamsS. (Ed.), Contemporary Music Review, Vol. 2, pan 1 (pp. 63–92). London, UK: Harwood Academic Publishers.
