The Mimetic Hypothesis and Embodied Musical Meaning

Abstract

German

Spanish

French

Italian

Research into the bodily basis of musical meaning has focused on conceptual metaphor and image schemata, but the processes whereby embodied experience becomes relevant to music conceptualization remains largely unexplained. This paper offers an account of music conceptualization that helps explain how embodied experience motivates and constrains the formation of basic musical meaning.

The core of the “mimetic hypothesis” holds that 1) we understand sounds in comparison to sounds we have made ourselves, and that 2) this process of comparison involves tacit imitation, or mimetic participation, which in turn draws on the prior embodied experience of sound production. Evidence for the hypothesis comes from developmental and neuropsychological studies, and from speech imagery, motor imagery, and musical imagery studies. The embodied experience activated during mimetic participation motivates and constrains the cross-domain mappings on which so many musical concepts depend. For example, the metaphoric concept of musical verticality cannot be accounted for without acknowledging the role of mimetic participation. If this participation is as fundamental to musical experience as the hypothesis suggests, not only will it allow us to account for music's most fundamental concepts, but it will also help account for the affective features of musical experience and meaning. Furthermore, the proposed view of mimetic participation helps establish a physical grounding for theories of musical gesture, semiotics, music and gender, music and drama, aural skills pedagogy, music and society, music and dance, and music therapy.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aldridge

. (2000). Musicality and rehabilitation in music therapy. In Woods

Luck

G.B.

Brochard

O'Neill

S. A.

Sloboda

J. A.

(eds), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition [CD-ROM]. Keele, Staffordshire, UK: Department of Psychology.

Armstrong

D. F.

Stokoe

W. C.

Wilcox

S. E.

(1995). Gesture and the nature of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Baddeley

Logie

(1992). Auditory imagery and working memory. In Reisberg

(ed.), Auditory imagery (pp. 179–97). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Carpenter

. (1967). The musical object. Current Musicology, 5, 56–87.

Clifton

. (1983). Music as heard New Haven: Yale University Press.

Cox

. (1998). As time goes by: The past, present, and future of musical motion. Paper presented at the 21st Annual Meeting of the Society for Music Theory, Chapel Hill, NC, December 2–6.

Cox

. (1999). Verticality, conceptual blending, and the mimetic hypothesis. Paper presented at the 22ndt Annual Meeting of the Society for Music Theory, Atlanta, GA, November 10–14.

Crowder

R. G.

Pitt

M.A.

(1992). Research on memory/imagery for musical timbre. In Reisberg

(ed.), Auditory imagery (pp. 29–44). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Cumming

. (1997). The subjectivities of “Erbarme Dich”. Music Analysis, 16 (1), 5–44.

10.

Fadiga

Buccino

Craighero

Fogassi

Gallese

Pavesi

(1998). Corticospinal excitability is specifically modulated by motor imagery: A magnetic stimulation study. Neuropsychologia, 37 (2), 147–58.

11.

Fadiga

Gallese

(1997). Action representation and language in the brain. Theoretical Linguistics, 23 (3), 267–80.

12.

Gallese

Fadiga

Fogassi

Rizzolatti

. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain, 119, 593–609.

13.

Gallese

Goldman

(1998). Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends In Cognitive Sciences, 2 (12), 493–501.

14.

Gathercole

S. E.

Baddeley

A. D.

(1993). Working memory and language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

15.

Gibson

E. J.

Levin

(1975). The psychology of reading. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

16.

Guck

. (1991). Two types of metaphoric transfer. In Kassler

J. C.

(ed.), Metaphor: A musical dimension (pp. 1–12). Sydney: Currency Press.

17.

Hess

E. H.

(1965). Attitude and pupil size. Scientific American, 212, 46–54.

18.

Hess

E.H.

(1975). The role of pupil size in communication. Scientific American, 233, 110–19.

19.

Kagen

Havemann

Segal

(1984). Psychology: An introduction. New York Harcourt, Brace, and Jovanovich.

20.

Lakoff

Johnson

(1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

21.

Larson

. (1993). Modeling melodic expectation: Using three “musical forces” to predict melodic continuations. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 629–34). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

22.

Lidov

. (1987). Mind and body in music. Semiotica, 66 (1), 66–97.

23.

Lochhead

Fisher

(1997). Performance and gesture: On the projection and apprehension of musical meaning. Paper presented at the 20th Annual Meeting of the Society for Music Theory, Phoenix, AZ, 30 November − 2 December.

24.

Malloch

S. N.

(1999/2000). Mothers and infants and communicative musicality. Musicœ Scientiœ, Special Issue, 29–57.

25.

McClary

. (1991). Feminine endings: Music, gender, and sexuality. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

26.

Mead

. (1996). Bodily hearing. Paper presented at the 19th Annual Meeting of the Society for Music Theory, Baton Rouge, L. A, 30 October − 4 November.

27.

Neisser

. (1976). Cognition and Reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. New York: Freeman.

28.

Papoušek

. (1996). Intuitive parenting: A hidden source of musical stimulation in infancy. In Deliège

Sloboda

(eds), Musical Beginnings: Origins and development of musical competence (pp. 88–112). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

29.

Rizzolatti

Fadiga

Gallese

Fogassi

(1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3 (2), 131–41.

30.

Smith

J. D.

Reisberg

Wilson

(1992). Subvocalization and auditory imagery: Interactions between the inner ear and inner voice. In Reisberg

(ed.), Auditory imagery (pp. 95–119). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

31.

Smith

J. D.

Wilson

Reisberg

(1995). The role of subvocalization in auditory imagery. Neurospychologia, 33 (11), 1433–54.

32.

Spencer

. (1951). The origin and function of music. In Spencer

(ed.), Literary style and music (pp. 45–106). New York: Philosophical Library.

33.

Stern

D. N.

(1985). The interpersonal world of the infant: A view from psychoanalysis and developmental psychology. New York: Basic Books.

34.

Trevarthen

. (1999/2000). Musicaliry and the intrinsic motive pulse: Evidence from human psychobiology and infant communication. Musics Scientiœ, Special Issue, 115–211.

35.

Vaneechoutte

Skoyles

J. R.

(1998). The memetic origin of language: Modern humans as musical primates. Journal of Memetics – Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission, 2. http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit/1998/vol2/vaneechoutte_m&skoyles_jr.html.

36.

Walton

. (1993). Understanding humor and understanding music. In Krausz

(ed.), The interpretation of music: Philosophical essays (pp. 259–70). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

37.

Walton

. (1997). Listening with imagination: Is music representational? In Robinson

(ed.), Music and meaning (pp. 57–82). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

38.

Young

. (1990). Throwing like a girl and other essays in feminist philosophy and socialtheory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

39.

Zuckerlandl

. (1956). Sound and Symbol: Music and the external world Transl. W. Trask. Princeton: Princeton University Press.