Abstract
Missing data are inevitable in quantitative research, yet the issue of missing data does not always receive adequate attention. Unless researchers report missing data, research consumers are left to assume default software protocols handled missing data—protocols that are frequently inappropriate, risk compromising a study's conclusions, and needlessly discard data shared by participants. This study reviews missing data reporting practices within the internationalization of higher education literature to determine how often researchers address missing data due to survey item nonresponse and which methods they used. Among the 35 sampled studies from the literature, only 37% explicitly addressed missing data and only 3% used a modern method endorsed by missing data researchers, signally the need to improve missing data reporting practices. To that end, this study concludes with a discussion on guidelines for reporting missing data, how missing data can be used to researchers’ advantage, and areas for future research.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
