Scholars have critiqued the current understanding of international students for glossing over its diversity, resulting in the reification of the “international student experience” as either homogeneous or clustered along nationality. Through a qualitative case study of 18 Chinese international students, this article examines the heterogeneity of their experiences despite a common nationality. Findings reveal that Chinese international students’ communication in English, engagement with subject content, preparation for the future, and participation in extracurricular activities vary by year of study, field of study, and, to a small extent, gender. Even within a single nationality, experiences of students are uneven and intersect across various categorical lines, suggesting the possibility that other international students may encounter diverse and intersectional experiences as well. Findings point to how we need to re-conceive and research international students by examining the heterogeneous nature of their experiences, and how higher education institutions can differentiate support given to internationals.
AbdullahD.Abd AzizM. I.Mohd IbrahimA. L. (2014). A “research” into international student-related research: (Re)visualising our stand?Higher Education, 67, 235-253. doi:10.1007/s10734-013-9647-3
2.
Abu-LugbodL. (1991). Writing against culture. In FoxR. (Ed.), Recapturing anthropology: Working in the present (pp. 137-162). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
3.
AltbachP. G.KnightJ. (2007). The internationalization of higher education: Motivations and realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11, 290-305.
4.
BistaK.FosterC. (2011). Issues of international student retention in American higher education. International Journal of Research and Review, 7(2), 1-10.
5.
ChenT.-H.BennettS. (2012). When Chinese learners meet constructivist pedagogy online. Higher Education, 64, 677-691. doi:10.1007/s10734-012-9520-9
6.
ChoudahaR. (2017). Three waves of international student mobility (1999–2020). Studies in Higher Education, 42, 825-832.
7.
ChowP.BhandariR. (2010). Open doors 2010 report on international educational exchange. New York, NY: Institute of International Education.
8.
CrawfordI.WangZ. (2015). The impact of individual factors on the academic attainment of Chinese and UK students in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 40, 902-920.
9.
DaviesC. A. (2008). Reflexive ethnography: A guide to researching selves and others (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
10.
EricksonF. (2011). Culture. In LevinsonB. A. U.PollockM. (Eds.), A companion to the anthropology of education (pp. 25-33). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
11.
FrydenbergE.LewisR. (1993). Boys play sport and girls turn to others: Age, gender and ethnicity as determinants of coping. Journal of Adolescence, 16, 253-266.
GlassC. R.KociolekE.WongtriratR.LynchR. J.CongS. (2015). Uneven experiences: The impact of student-faculty interactions on international students’ sense of belonging. Journal of International Students, 5, 353-367.
14.
GuoY.GuoS. (2017). Internationalization of Canadian higher education: Discrepancies between policies and international student experiences. Studies in Higher Education, 42, 851-868.
15.
GutiérrezK. D.RogoffB. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19-25.
16.
HanassabS. (2006). Diversity, international students, and perceived discrimination: Implications for educators and counselors. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10, 157-172.
17.
HatchA. J. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. Albany: State University of New York Press.
18.
HegginsW. J.IIIJacksonJ. F. L. (2003). Understanding the collegiate experience for Asian international students at a Midwestern research university. College Student Journal, 37, 379-391.
19.
HengT. T. (2017). Voices of Chinese international students in USA colleges:‘I want to tell them that…’. Studies in Higher Education, 42(5), 833-850.
20.
HengT. T. (2018a). Coping strategies of Chinese international undergraduates in response to challenges in U.S. colleges. Teachers College Record. Online publication. http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=21989
21.
HengT. T. (2018b). Different is not deficient: Contradicting stereotypes around Chinese international students in U.S. higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 43(1), 22-36.
22.
HengT. T. (2018c). Exploring the complex and non-linear evolution of Chinese international students’ experiences in USA Colleges. Higher Education Research and Development, 37(6), 1141-1155.
23.
HengT. T. (Forthcoming). The case for more theoretical engagement and diversification in higher education qualitative research on Chinese international students.
IwamotoD. K.LiuW. M. (2010). The impact of racial identity, ethnic identity, Asian values, and race-related stress on Asian Americans and Asian international college students’ psychological well-being. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57, 79-91.
26.
JonesE. (2017). Problematising and reimagining the notion of “international student experience.” Studies in Higher Education, 42, 933-943.
27.
KimH. S. (2002). We talk, therefore we think? A cultural analysis of the effect of talking on thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 828-842.
28.
KlemenčičM. (2015). What is student agency? An ontological exploration in the context of research on student engagement. In KlemenčičM.BerganS.PrimožičR. (Eds.), Student engagement in Europe: Society, higher education and student governance (pp. 11-29). Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe Publishing.
29.
LeCompteM. D.SchensulJ. (1999). Designing and conducting ethnographic research. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
30.
LeeJ. J. (2014). Understanding international students: Beyond U.S.-centrism and towards international consciousness. In HarperS.QuayeS. (Eds.), Student engagement in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and practical approaches for diverse populations (pp. 105-120). New York, NY: Routledge.
31.
MooresL.PopadiukN. (2011). Positive aspects of international student transitions: A qualitative inquiry. Journal of College Student Development, 52, 291-306.
32.
NasirN. i. S.HandV. M. (2006). Exploring sociocultural perspectives on race, culture, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 76, 449-475.
PykeK. D.JohnsonD. L. (2003). Asian American women and racialized femininities: “Doing” gender across cultural worlds. Gender & Society, 17, 33-53.
35.
RogoffB. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
36.
RubleR. A.ZhangY. B. (2013). Stereotypes of Chinese international students held by Americans. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 37, 202-211.
37.
RyanJ. (2011). Teaching and learning for international students: Towards a transcultural approach. Teachers and Teaching, 17, 631-648.
38.
ShentonA. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research. Education for Information, 22, 63-75.
39.
SkyrmeG. (2007). Entering the university: The differentiated experience of two Chinese international students in a New Zealand university. Studies in Higher Education, 32, 357-372.
40.
TranL. T. (2008). Unpacking academic requirements: International students in Management and Education disciplines. Higher Education Research & Development, 27, 245-256.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
WangY. (2012). Mainland Chinese students’ group work adaptation in a UK business school. Teaching in Higher Education, 17, 523-535.
44.
WarnerS.DixonM. A. (2013). Sports and community on campus: Constructing a sports experience that matters. Journal of College Student Development, 54, 283-298.
45.
WillisP. (1981). Cultural production is different from cultural reproduction is different from social reproduction is different from reproduction. Interchange, 12, 48-67.
46.
WongY. J.OwenJ.TranK. K.CollinsD. L.HigginsC. E. (2012). Asian American male college students’ perceptions of people’s stereotypes about Asian American men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 13, 75-88.
47.
WuQ. (2015). Re-examining the “Chinese learner”: A case study of mainland Chinese students’ learning experiences at British universities. Higher Education, 70, 753-766. doi:10.1007/s10734-015-9865-y
48.
YanK.BerlinerD. C. (2009). Chinese international students’ academic stressors in the U.S. College Student Journal, 43, 939-960.
49.
ZhaoT.BourneJ. (2011). Intercultural adaptation—It is a two-way process: Examples from a British MBA programme. In JinL.CortazziM. (Eds.), Researching Chinese learners: Skills, perceptions, and intercultural adaptations (pp. 250-273). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
50.
ZhouY.TodmanJ. (2009). Patterns of adaptation of Chinese postgraduate students in the United Kingdom. Journal of Studies in International Education, 13, 467-486. doi:10.1177/1028315308317937
