BaradK. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28, 801-831.
2.
BaronP.CorbinL. (2012). Student engagement: Rhetoric and reality. Higher Education Research & Development, 31, 759-772. doi:10.1080/07294360.2012.655711
3.
BovillC.BulleyJ.MorssK. (2011). Engaging and empowering first-year students through curriculum design: Perspectives from the literature. Teaching in Higher Education, 16, 197-209. doi:10.1080/13562517.2010.515024
4.
ConnellR. (2007). Southern theory: The global dynamics of knowledge in social science. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
DunneE.ZandstraR. (2011). Students as change agents—New ways of engaging with learning and teaching in higher education. London, England: Higher Education Academy.
7.
GreenW.WhitsedC. (Eds.). (2015). Critical perspectives on internationalising the curriculum in disciplines: Reflective narrative accounts from business, education and health. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
8.
JonesE. (2013). Internationalization and employability: The role of intercultural experiences in the development of transferable skills. Public Money & Management, 33, 95-104.
KahuE. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38, 758-773.
11.
LeaskB. (2015). Internationalising the curriculum. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
12.
MatthewsK. (2016). Students as partners as the future of student engagement. Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal, 1(1), 1-5.
13.
McInnisC.HartleyR. (2002). Managing study and work: The impact of full-time study and paid work on the undergraduate experience in Australian universities: Australian Government. Retrieved from http://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv%3A5358
14.
MezirowJ. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
15.
NearyM. (2010). Student as producer: a pedagogy for the avant-garde?Learning Exchange, 1 (1), 1-12.