The aim of this article is to explain how internationalization that is so widespread today has developed into an accepted standard in local contexts. This study demonstrates that internationalization of higher education can be regarded as a norm-building process that is facilitated through the active behavior of institutional agents. By using the illustrative case of Estonia, the article identifies different stages, actors, motives, and mechanisms that played a crucial role in establishing internationalization practices in Estonia’s higher education system. Informed by the data gathered through 28 interviews and three focus groups, the study also reveals the specific contextual conditions that may influence a country’s internationalization practices.
AcharyaA. (2004). How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism. International organization, 58, 239-275.
2.
AltbachP. G.KnightJ. (2007). The internationalization of higher education: Motivations and realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11, 290-305.
3.
Archimedes Foundation. (2008). Bologna protsess Eestis 2004-2008. [The Bologna Process in Estonia 2004-2008]. Ed. A. Valk. Retrieved from www.hm.ee/index.php?popup=download&;id=8966
BjörkdahlA. (2006). Promoting norms through peacekeeping: UNPREDEP and conflict prevention. International Peacekeeping, 13, 214-228.
6.
BjörkdahlA. (2008). Norm advocacy: A small state strategy to influence the EU. Journal of European Public Policy, 15, 135-154.
7.
BurnettS. A.HuismanJ. (2009). Universities’ responses to globalisation: The influence of organisational culture. Journal of Studies in International Education, 14, 117-142.
8.
ByunK.KimM. (2011). Shifting patterns of the government’s policies for the internationalization of Korean higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 15, 467-486.
9.
CheckelJ. T. (2001). The Europeanization of citizenship? In CowlesM. G.CaporasoJ. A.RisseT. (Eds.), Transforming Europe: Europeanization and domestic change (pp. 180-197). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
10.
CowenR. (2009). Then and now: Unit ideas and comparative education. In CowenR.KazamiasA. M. (Eds.), International handbook of comparative education (pp. 1277-1294). Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York.
11.
CreswellJ. W. (2014). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
DenmanB. (2002). Globalisation and its impact on international university cooperation. Globalization, 2(1), 1-14.
13.
de WitH. (2002). Internationalization of higher education in the United States of America and Europe: A historical, comparative and conceptual analysis. Westport. CT: Greenwood.
14.
de WitH. (2011). Internationalization of higher education: Nine misconceptions. Available from https://htmldbprod.bc.edu
15.
DunnM.NilanP. (2007). Balancing economic and other discourses in the internationalization of higher education in South Africa. International Review of Education, 53, 265-281.
16.
ElgströmO. (2000). Norm negotiations. The construction of new norms regarding gender and development in EU foreign aid policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 7, 457-476.
17.
EndersJ. (2004). Higher education, internationalisation, and the nation-state: Recent developments and challenges to governance theory. Higher Education, 47, 361-382.
FeldmannM. (2006). Emerging varieties of capitalism in transition countries industrial relations and wage bargaining in Estonia and Slovenia. Comparative Political Studies, 39, 829-854.
20.
FinnemoreM.SikkinkK. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52, 887-917.
21.
Gacel-AvilaJ. (2005). The internationalisation of higher education: A paradigm for global citizenry. Journal of Studies in International Education, 9, 121-136.
22.
GurowitzA. (1999). Mobilizing international norms: Domestic actors, immigrants, and the Japanese state. World Politics, 51, 413-445.
23.
HughesR. (2008). Internationalization of higher education and language policy: Questions of quality and equity. Higher Education Management and Policy, 20(1), 1-18.
24.
KälvermarkT.Van der WendeM. C. (1997). National policies for internationalisation of higher education in Europe. Stockholm, Sweden: National Agency for Higher Education.
KnightJ. (2006). Internationalization: Concepts, complexities, and challenges. In ForestJ. F.AltbachP. G. (Eds). International handbook of higher education (pp. 207-227). Springer: Netherlands.
27.
KnightJ. (2008). Higher education in turmoil: The changing world of Internationalization. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
28.
KnightJ. (2011). Five myths about internationalization. International Higher Education, 62(Winter), 14-15.
29.
KnightJ.de WitH. (Eds.). (1997). Internationalization of higher education in Asia Pacific countries. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: European Association for International Education.
KrippendorfK. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
32.
LavankuraP. (2013). Internationalizing higher education in Thailand government and university responses. Journal of Studies in International Education, 17, 663-676.
33.
Luijten-LubA. (2007). Choices in internationalisation: How higher education institutions respond to internationalisation, Europeanisation, and globalisation. University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
34.
Luijten-LubA.Van der WendeM.HuismanJ. (2005). On cooperation and competition: A comparative analysis of national policies for internationalisation of higher education in seven Western European countries. Journal of Studies in International Education, 9, 147-163.
35.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
Ministry of Education and Research. (2004). Strategies. Available from http://hm.ee/en
37.
Ministry of Education and Research. (2006). Estonian higher education internationalization strategy, 2006-2015. Available from http://hm.ee/en
38.
Ministry of Education and Research. (2011). Strategies. Available from http://hm.ee/en
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2014). Country statistical profile. Estonia. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/estonia/
41.
PayneR. A. (2001). Persuasion, frames, and norm construction. European Journal of International Relations, 7, 37-61.
42.
RisseT. (1999). International norms and domestic change: Arguing and communicative behavior in the human rights area. Politics & Society, 27, 529-559.
43.
RivzaB.TeichlerU. (2007). The changing role of student mobility. Higher Education Policy, 20, 457-475.
44.
StraussA. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
45.
TamtikM.KirssL.BeerkensM.KaarnaR. (2011). Kõrghariduse rahvusvahelistumise strateegia vahehindamine. Lõpparuanne. Interim evaluation of the strategy of the higher education internationalization. Final report. Tartu, Estonia: PRAXIS.
46.
TrilokekarR. D. (2010). International education as soft power? The contributions and challenges of Canadian foreign policy to the internationalization of higher education. Higher Education, 59, 131-147.
47.
Van der WendeM. (2007). Internationalization of Higher Education in the OECD Countries: Challenges and opportunities for the coming decade. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11, 274-289.
48.
VerbikL.LasanowskiV. (2007). International student mobility: Patterns and trends. World Education News & Reviews, 20(10), 1-16.
