Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article examines web comments written by Chinese learners on online open courses that are originally produced by leading universities in the United States and United Kingdom and are later introduced to China with Chinese translation. It applies the thematic discourse analysis strategy to classify the comments into themes to explore the patterns of studying behaviors of the Chinese learners. The analysis reveals that open access as the concept and practice of educational resources sharing is overwhelmingly supported. With regard to open course content, the Chinese are more interested in course materials that echo their daily experience than in courses that merely deliver knowledge and skills. A debate on the social effect of foreign open courses on Chinese ideology is discussed.

Keywords

cross-border delivery of education globalization and international higher education International cooperation in higher education Internationalization of higher education Internationalization of teaching learning research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aranzadi

(2005). Translation of OER Universia. In IIEP Open Educational Resources Forum 1, Session 3-Background note, Perspectives of the Users and Issues Related to Use. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/iiep/virtualuniversity/forumsfiche.php?queryforumspages_id=17

Aronson

(1994). A pragmatic view of thematic analysis. The Qualitative Report, 2(1). Retrieved December 16, 2011, from : http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/BackIssues/QR2-1/aronson.html

Atkins

D. E.

Brown

J. S.

Hammond

A.L.

(2007). A review of the open educational resources (OER) movement: Achievements, challenges, and new opportunities. Report to the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. Retrieved from http://learn.creativecommons.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/areviewoftheopeneducationalresourcesoermovement_bloglink.pdf

Barker

(2003). Satanic subcultures? A discourse analysis of the self-perceptions of young goths and pagans. In Waddell

(Ed.), Cultural expressions of evil and wickedness: Wrath, sex, and crime. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Rodopi.

Bateman

(2005). Open distance and eLearning initiative, African Virtual University. In IIEP Open Educational Resources Forum 1, Session 3-Background note, Perspectives of the Users and Issues Related to Use. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/iiep/virtualuniversity/forumsfiche.php?queryforumspages_id=17

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Braun

Wilkinson

(2003). Liability or asset? Women talk about the vagina. Psychology of Women Section Review, 5(2), 28-42.

Brown

J. S.

Adler

R. P.

(2008). Minds on fire: Open education, the long tail, and learning 2.0. EDUCAUSE Review, 43(1). Retrieved from http://webpages.csus.edu/~sac43949/PDFs/minds_on_fire.pdf

Caswell

Henson

Jensen

Wiley

(2008). Open educational resources: Enabling universal education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(1). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/viewArticle/469/1001

10.

Chmiel

Holyst

J.A.

(2010). Flow of emotional messages in artificial social networks. International Journal of Modern Phycics C, 5, 593-602.

11.

Chmiel

Sobkowicz

Sienkiewicz

Paltoglou

Buckley

Thelwall

Holyst

J. A.

(2010). Negative emotions boost users activity at BBC Forum. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 390, 2936-2944.

12.

Dewey

(1998). Experience and education (The 60th anniversary edition). Indianapolis, IN: Kappa Delta Pi.

13.

Diamant

(2009). Embattled glory: Veterans, military families, and the politics of patriotism in China, 1949–2007. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

14.

Downes

(2007). Models for sustainable open educational resources. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3, 29-44. Retrieved from http://ijklo.org/Volume3/IJKLOv3p029-044Downes.pdf

15.

d’Antoni

(2008). Open educational resources: The way forward (UNESCO Report). Retrieved from http://www.icde.org/filestore/Resources/Taskforce_on_OER/OERWayForward.pdf

16.

Evans

J. A.

Reimer

(2009). Open access and global participation in science. Science, 323, 1025.

17.

Fang

Zhu

(2006). The open access movement in China. Interlending & Document Supply, 34, 186-193.

18.

Furukawa

Ishizuka

Matsuo

Ohmukai

Uchiyama

(2007). Analyzing reading behavior by blog mining. AAAI’07 Proceeding of the 22nd National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2, 1353-1358.

19.

Geser

(2007). Open educational practices and resources: The OLCOS roadmap 2012. RUSC, 4(1), 1-9.

20.

Gee

J. P.

(1999). An introduction to discourse analysis. London, UK: Routledge.

21.

Gries

P. H.

Zhang

Crowson

H. M.

Cai

(2011). Patriotism, nationalism and China’s US policy: Structures and consequences of Chinese national identity. The China Quarterly, 206, 1-17.

22.

Habermas

(1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

23.

Hamelink

C. J.

(2000). The ethics of cyberspace. London, UK: Sage.

24.

Harnad

(1990). Scholarly skywriting and the prepublication continuum of scientific inquiry. Psychological Science, 1, 342-343.

25.

Heath

(2006). The amazing freebie economy. The Spectator. Retrieved from http://www.spectator.co.uk/business/26458/the-amazing-freebie-economy.thtml

26.

Herring

S.C.

Kouper

Paolillo

J.C.

Scheidt

L.A.

Tyworth

Welsch

Wright

(2005). Conversations in the blogosphere: An analysis ‘from the bottom up’. Proceedings of the Thirty-Eight Hawaii International Conference on System Science. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Press.

27.

Hylén

(2006). Open educational resources: Opportunities and challenges. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/5/47/37351085.pdf

28.

Hsu

C. F.

Khabiri

Caverlee

(2009). Ranking comments on the social web. CSE ‘09 Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering, 4, 90-97. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.

29.

Sun

Lim

E. P.

(2008, July 20-24). Comments-oriented document summarization: Understanding documents with readers’ feedback. SIGIR’08 Proceedings, Singapore.

30.

Johnstone

S. M.

(2005). Open educational resources serve the world. Educause Quarterly, 3, 11-18. Retrieved from: http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/EQM0533.pdf

31.

Koohang

Harman

(2007). Advancing sustainability of open educational resources. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 4, 535-544. Retrieved from http://proceedings.informingscience.org/InSITE2007/IISITv4p535-544Kooh275.pdf

32.

LaFraniere

(2010, January 6). Fighting trend, China is luring scientists home. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/07/world/asia/07scholar.html?_r=1

33.

(n.d.). Brand culture and consumption: Chinese consumers and the foreign brands (Doctoral thesis), Université d’Aix- Marseille, France. Retrieved from http://www.cerdi.org/uploads/sfCmsContent/html/253/LI_Chen.pdf

34.

Mishne

Glance

(2006, May 22-26). Leave a reply: An analysis of weblog comments. WWW2006 Proceedings, Edinburgh, UK.

35.

Mulder

(2007). The advancement of lifelong learning through open educational resources in an open and flexible (self)learning context. Paper presented at the ICDE Standing Conference of Presidents SCOP, Open Universiteit, Heerlen, Netherlands. Retrieved from http://www.ou.nl/Docs/Campagnes/SCOP/OER_paper_by_Fred_Mulder.pdf

36.

Parer

M.S.

(1993). Developing open courses, Center for Distance Learning. Monash University, Victoria, Australia.

37.

Sabry

(2005). Adaptation of OER for Egypt, Universite Francaise d’Egypte. In IIEP Open Educational Resources Forum 1, Session 3-Background note, Perspectives of the Users and Issues Related to Use. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/iiep/virtualuniversity/forumsfiche.php?queryforumspages_id=17

38.

Schweitzer

Garcia

(2010). An agent-based model of collective emotions in online communities. The European Physical Journal B, 77, 533-545.

39.

Shen

Breslin

, eds. (2010). Online Chinese nationalism and China’s blateral relations. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

40.

Smith

M. S.

Casserly

C. M.

(2006). The promise of open education resources. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 38(5), 8-17. Retrieved from http://learn.creativecommons.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/changearticle.pdf

41.

Sobkowicz

(2010). Dynamics of hate based Internet user networks. The European Physical Journal B, 73, 633-643.

42.

Stacey

(2007). Open educational resources in a global context. First Monday, 12(4). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1769/1649

43.

Suber

(2009). Timeline of the open access movement. Retrieved from http://oad.simmons.edu/oadwiki/Timeline

44.

van Dijk

T. A.

(1977). Text and context: Explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse. London, UK: Longman.

45.

Vest

C. M.

(2006). Open content and the emerging global meta-university. Educause Review, 41(3),18-30. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM0630.pdf

46.

Vollmer

(2011). New federal education fund makes available $2 billion to create OER resources in community colleges. Retrieved from https://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/26100

47.

Wiley

(2007). On the sustainability of open educational resource initiatives in higher education. Paper commissioned by the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI). Retrieved from: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/33/9/38645447.pdf

48.

Wilson

(2008). New ways of mediating learning: Investigating the implications of adopting open educational resources for tertiary education at an institution in the United Kingdom as compared to one in South Africa. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(1), 1-19. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/485/1000

49.

Xia

(2008). Scholarly communication in China, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea and Taiwan. Oxford, UK: Chandos Publishing.

50.

Xia

(2009). Extreme human powered Web search: Renrou. Online, 33(1), 33-36.

51.

Xia

(2010). A longitudinal study of scholars attitudes and behaviors in open access publishing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 61(3), 615-624.

52.

Xia

(2011). An anthropological emic-etic perspective of open access practices. Journal of Documentation, 67(1), 75-94.

53.

Xia

(2012). Diffusionism and open access practices. Journal of Documentation, 68(1), 72-99.

54.

Xia

Liu

(2011, October 24). Usage of open data repositories: The case of genomic dataset. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Global Collaboration of Information Schools, Beijing.

55.

Xia

Spotts

L. C.

(2011). A user-centered perspective of open educational resources. Ubiquitous Learning: An International Journal, 3(3), 71-84.

56.

Yang

(2003). The internet and the civil society in China: A preliminary assessment. Journal of Contemporary China, 12, 453-475.

57.

Zhang

H. Y.

(2010), CrossCheck: An effective tool for detecting plagiarism. Learned Publishing, 23(1), 9-14.

58.

Zhang

Zheng

, Eds. (2009). China’s information and communications technology revolution. London, UK: Routledge.

Commenting on Western Open Courses by Chinese Learners

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References