International collaborations are frequently mentioned in university strategies as a way of promoting internationalization, often in relation to achieving greater connectivity among staff from different backgrounds. Much less explicit attention is paid to the underlying rationale for facilitating such connectivity, or the challenges academic staff may face in participating in such collaborations. In this article, the author argues that failure to pay adequate attention to such interaction issues can hinder the added value that international projects can offer and that much greater attention needs to be paid to the collaboration process itself in order to maximize benefits. The author analyzes the interaction experiences of staff who participated in a set of Sino-British collaborative e-learning projects and reports and illustrates the key challenges they faced and the ways in which they responded. The article concludes with a number of implications and recommendations for personnel involved in researching, planning, and/or participating in international education collaborations.
BadleyG. (2000). Developing globally-competent university teachers. Innovations in Education and Training International, 37(3), 244-253.
2.
BlackK. (2004). A review of factors which contribute to the internationlisation of a programme of study. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Management, 3(1), 5-18.
3.
BrookesM.BecketN. (2011). Developing global perspectives through international management degrees. Journal of Studies in International Education, 15(4), 374-394.
Canney DavisonS.WardK. (1999). Leading international teams. London: McGraw-Hill.
6.
De WitH.BeelenJ. (2013). Socrates in the Low Countries: Designing, implementing, and facilitating internationalisation of the curriculum at the Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (HvA). In RyanJ. (Ed.), Cross cultural teaching and learning for home and international students: Internationalisation of pedagogy and curriculum in higher education (pp. 156-167). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
7.
DiStefanoJ.MaznevskiM. (2000). Creating value with diverse teams in global management. Organizational Dynamics, 29(1), 45-63.
8.
DunnL.WallaceM. (2008). Intercultural communities of practice. In DunnL.WallaceM. (Eds.), Teaching in transnational higher education (pp. 249-259). London: Routledge.
9.
EarleyP. C.GardnerH. K. (2005). Internal dynamics and cultural intelligence in multinational teams. In ShapiroD.von GlinowM. A.ChengJ. L. C. (Eds.), Managing multinational teams: Global perspectives (pp. 1-31). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
HangesP. J.LyonJ. S.DorfmanP. W. (2005). Managing a multinational team: Lessons from Project Globe. In ShapiroD.von GlinowM. A.ChengJ. L. C. (Eds.), Managing multinational teams: Global perspectives (pp. 337-360). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
12.
KimT. (2009). Transnational academic mobility, internationalization and interculturality in higher education. Intercultural Education, 20(5), 395-405.
13.
LeaskB. (2004, July7-9). Transnational education and intercultural Learning: Reconstructing the offshore teaching team to enhance internationalisation. Paper presented at the Australian Universities Quality Forum, “Quality in a time of change,”Adelaide, Australia. Retrieved from http://www.unisanet.unisa.edu.au/staff/homepage.asp?Name=betty.leask
14.
LeaskB. (2007). International teachers and international learning. In JonesE.BrownS. (Eds.), Internationalising higher education (pp. 86-94). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
15.
LunnJ. (2008). Global perspectives in higher education: Taking the agenda forward in the United Kingdom. Journal of Studies in International Education, 12(3), 231-254.
16.
McNicollY. R.ClohessyJ. M.LuffA. R. (2005, July6-8). Auditing offshore partnerships: Lessons from reviewing nursing and psychology courses offered in Singapore. In Proceedings of the 2005 Australian Universities Quality Forum, “Engaging communities” (pp. 108-112). Sydney, Australia. Retrieved from http://www.auqa.edu.au/files/publications/full_proceedings.pdf
17.
Spencer-OateyH. (Ed.). (2007). e-Learning initiatives in China. Pedagogy, policy and culture. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
18.
Spencer-OateyH.FranklinP. (2009). Intercultural interaction. A multidisciplinary approach to intercultural communication. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
19.
Spencer-OateyH.Işık-GülerH.StadlerS. (2011). Intercultural communication. In HandfordM.GeeJ. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 572-586). London: Routledge.
20.
StohlM. (2007). We have met the enemy and he is us: The role of the faculty in the internationalization of higher education in the coming decade. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3/4), 359-372.
21.
TeagardenM. B.DrostE. A.von GlinowM. A. (2005). The life cycle of academic international research teams: Just when you thought “virtual” teams were all the rage . . . here come the AIRTS! In ShapiroD.von GlinowM. A.ChengJ. L. C. (Eds.), Managing multinational teams: Global perspectives (pp. 303-336). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
22.
Ting-ToomeyS. (1999). Communicating across cultures. New York, NY: Guilford.
