This report outlines a method for learning about the internationalization processes at institutions of adult and higher education and then provides the analysis of data gathered from the researchers’ own institution and from site visits to three additional universities in the United States and the United Kingdom. It was found that campus internationalization requires a deep understanding and appreciation of the institutional context. In addition, although elements of internationalization may be implemented, the findings indicate there is a need to underpin these approaches with (a) a shared understanding of what internationalization is and the ways it should ultimately impact student learning within an institution and (b) a collection of assessment methods for evaluating internationalization efforts and learning outcomes. Implications and recommendations for further research are also offered.
Academic Ranking of World Universities. (2009). Retrieved from http://www.arwu.org/
2.
AltbachP. G.KnightJ. K. (2006). The internationalization of higher education: Motivations and realities. The NEA 2006 Almanac of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.nea.org/assets/img/PubAlmanac/ALM_06_03.pdf
3.
AltbachP. G.KnightJ. K. (2007). The internationalization of higher education: Motivations and realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11, 290-305.
ArumS. (1987). International education: What is it? A taxonomy of international education of U.S. universities. CIEE Occasional Papers on International Educational Exchange, 23, 5-22.
6.
BogdanR. C.BiklenS. K. (2003). Data analysis and interpretation of qualitative research for education (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
7.
BoucouvalasM. (2005). Forging the family of humankind through international adult education. Adult Learning, 16(1-2), 17-19.
8.
BrownS.JonesE. (2007). Introduction: Values, valuing and value in an internationalised higher education context. In JonesE.BrownS. (Eds.), Internationalising higher education (pp. 1-6). New York, NY: Routledge.
9.
Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (2005). The Carnegie classification of institutions of higher education. Retrieved from http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/
10.
ChieffoL.GriffithsL. (2009). Here to stay: Increasing acceptance of short-term study abroad programs. In LewinR. (Ed.), The handbook of practice and research In study abroad: Higher education and the quest for global citizenship (pp. 365-380). New York, NY: Routledge.
11.
De VitaG. (2007). Taking stock: An appraisal of the literature on internationalising HE learning. In JonesE.BrownS. (Eds.), Internationalising higher education (pp. 154-167). New York, NY: Routledge.
12.
de WitH. (1995). Strategies for internationalisation of higher education: A comparative study of Australia, Canada, Europe and the United States of America. Amsterdam, Netherlands: European Associate for International Education.
13.
DeardorffD. K. (2006). Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of Studies In International Education, 10, 241-266.
14.
DekaneyE. M. (2008). Students’ pre-departure expectations and post-sojourn observations In a short-term international program abroad on the culture, music, and art of Brazil. International Education, 37(2), 17-29.
15.
DolbyN.RahmanA. (2008). Research In international education. Review of Educational Research, 78, 676-727.
16.
DwyerM. M. (2004, Fall). More is better: The impact of study abroad program duration. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 10, 151-163.
17.
EdwardsR.CroslingG.Petrovic-LazarovicS.O’NeilP. (2003). Internationalisation of business education: Meaning and implementation. Higher Education Research and Development, 22, 184-192.
18.
EngleL.EngleJ. (2003, Fall). Study abroad levels: Toward a classification of program types. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 9, 1-20.
19.
FrancisA. (1993). Facing the future: The internationalization of post-secondary institutions In British Columbia. Task Force Report. Vancouver, Canada: British Columbia Centre for International Education.
20.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
21.
GrayK. S.MurdockG. K.StebbinsC. D. (2002, May/June). Assessing study abroad’s effect on an international mission. Change, 45-51.
22.
GreenM. F. (2003). The challenge of internationalizing undergraduate education: Global learning for all. Paper presented at the Global Challenges and US Higher Education Conference, Duke University, Durham, NC.
23.
GreenM. F. (2007). Internationalizing community colleges: Barriers and strategies. New Directions for Community Colleges, 138, 15-24.
24.
GreenR.ShoenbergR. (2006). Where faculty live: Internationalizing the disciplines. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
25.
HamelJ.DufourS.FortinD. (1993). Case study methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26.
HarmonG. (2004). New directions In internationalizing higher education: Australia’s development as an exporter of higher education services. Higher Education Policy, 17, 101-120.
27.
HollandT.PithersR. T. (2005, July). Making a difference: A cross-cultural challenge. Proceedings of the 35th Annual SCUTREA Conference, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
28.
IbrahimT. (2005). Global citizenship education: Mainstreaming the curriculum?Cambridge Journal of Education, 35, 177-194.
29.
JonesE. (2007). International reflections and culture change. In JonesE.BrownS. (Eds.), Internationalising higher education (pp. 25-41). New York, NY: Routledge.
30.
KnightJ.de WitH. (1995). Strategies for internationalisation of higher education: Historical and conceptual perspectives. In de WitH. (Ed.), Strategies for internationalisation of higher education (pp. 5-32). Amsterdam, Netherlands: European Associate for International Education.
31.
LaveJ. (1988). Cognition In practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture In everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
LaveJ.WengerE. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
33.
MartinI. (2006, July). “Principled positions” for adult learning: Where have all the flowers gone?Proceedings of the 36th Annual SCUTREA Conference, Trinity and All Saints College, Leeds, UK.
34.
McNamaraD.HarrisR. (Eds.). (1997). Overseas students In higher education. London, UK: Routledge.
35.
ModelskiG.DevezasT.ThompsonW. R. (2008). Assessment: What have we learnt? In ModelskiG.DevezasT.ThompsonW. R. (Eds.), Globalization as evolutionary process: Modeling global change (pp. 417-430). New York, NY: Routledge.
36.
NgR.ShanH. (2007, July). Learning to navigate the Canadian labour market: The experiences of professional Chinese immigrant women. Proceedings of the 37th Annual SCUTREA Conference, Queen’s University, Belfast, UK.
RutherN. L. (2002). Barely there, powerfully present: Thirty years of US policy on international higher education. New York, NY: Routledge-Farmer.
39.
SchoormanF. D. (2000). How is internationalization implemented: A framework for organizational practice(ED 444426). Retrieved from ERIC database.
40.
SolomonN.ZukasM. (2006, July). Globalizing academic communities: New ceremonial spaces for academic identities. Proceedings of the 36th Annual SCUTREA Conference (pp. 371-378), Trinity and All Saints College, Leeds, UK.
41.
SpencerS.MurrayT.TumaK. (2005). Short-term programs abroad. In BrockingtonJ.HoffaW.MartinP. (Eds.), NAFSA’s guide to education abroad for advisers and administrators (3rd ed., pp. 373-387). Washington, DC: NAFSA—Association of International Educators.
42.
StevensonJ.WillotJ. (2008, July). The role of cultural capital theory In explaining the absence from U.K. higher education of refugees and other non-traditional students. Proceedings of the 38th Annual SCUTREA Conference, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
43.
The University of Texas at San Antonio Fact Book. (2009, Fall). Student enrollment. Retrieved from the University of Texas at San Antonio Office of Institutional Research website http://www.UTSA.edu/ir/FactBook.html
44.
Vande BergM. (2007). Intervening In the learning of U.S. students abroad. Journal of Studies In International Education, 11, 392-399.
45.
WhalleyT.LangleyL.VillarrealL.CollegeD. (1997). Best practice guidelines for internationalizing the curriculum. Victoria, British Columbia, Canada: Ministry of Education, Skills and Training and Centre for Curriculum, Transfer and Technology. Retrieved from http://www.jcu.edu.au/teaching/idc/groups/public/documents/ebook/jcuprd_018292.pdf
46.
WilkinsonG. (2006). McSchools for McWorld? Mediating global pressures with a McDonalidizing education policy response. Cambridge Journal of Education, 1, 81-98.
47.
WoolfM. (2007). Impossible things before breakfast: Myths In education abroad. Journal of Studies In International Education, 11, 496-509.
48.
WuW. (2006, July). East Asian international postgraduate students In on U.K. university: A cross-cultural perspective. Proceedings of the 36th Annual SCUTREA Conference (pp. 446-474), Trinity and All Saints College, Leeds, UK.
49.
WylieM. (2008). Internationalizing curriculum: Framing theory and practice In international schools. Journal of Research on International Education, 7(1), 5-19.
50.
YinR. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
