This comparative case study explored the motives and goals of two American students participating in short-term study abroad (SA). Findings, interpreted from an activity theory perspective, demonstrated that despite similar language-learning histories and demographic characteristics, the students were learning French and participating in SA for different reasons. Dissimilarities between their language-learning motives and goals for SA led to differences in their experiences using French and interacting with host families and, later, to shifts in goals and language-learning strategies. These findings offer support for a relational definition of the context of learning during SA wherein context is emergent from individuals’ language-learning motives and reasons for engaging in SA, goals for SA, and resulting actions. Practical implications of this study include the need for intervention in student learning during SA.
Allen, H.W. ( 2002). Does study abroad make a difference? A study of motivational and linguistic outcomes (Doctoral dissertation, Emory University, 2002). Dissertation Abstracts International, 63, 1279.
2.
Allen, H.W., & Herron, C.A. ( 2003). A mixed methodology investigation of the linguistic and affective outcomes of summer study abroad. Foreign Language Annals, 36, 370-384.
3.
Davidson, D.E. ( 2007). Study abroad and outcomes measurements: The case of Russian . Modern Language Journal, 91, 276-280.
4.
Douglass, K. ( 2007). From the learner’s perspective: A case study on motives and study abroad. In S. Wilkinson (Ed.), AAUSC issues in language program direction: Insights from study abroad for language programs (pp. 116-132). Boston: Heinle.
5.
Dwyer, M.M. ( 2004). More is better: The impact of study abroad program duration . Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad , 10, 151-163.
6.
Engeström, Y. ( 1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
7.
Engeström, Y. ( 1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation . In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R-L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19-38). Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Freed, B.F. ( 1990). Language learning in a study abroad context: The effects of interactive and non-interactive out-of-class contact on grammatical achievement and oral proficiency. In J. Atlantis (Ed.), Linguistic, language teaching and language acquisition: The interdependence of theory, practice and research (pp. 459-477). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
9.
Freed, B.F., Segalowitz, N., & Dewey, D.P. ( 2004). Context of learning and second language fluency in French . Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 275-311.
10.
Gillette, B. ( 1994). The role of learner goals in L2 success. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 195-213). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
11.
Institute of International Education. (2008 ). Open doors: Report on international educational exchange . New York: Author. Retrieved November 17, 2008, from http://opendoors.iienetwork.org/
12.
Kim, T-Y. ( 2007). Second language learning motivation from an activity theory perspective: Longitudinal case studies from Korean ESL students and recent immigrants in Toronto (Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, 2007). Dissertation Abstracts International, A68-06.
13.
Kinginger, C. ( 2004). Alice doesn’t live here anymore: Foreign language learning and identity reconstruction. In A. Pavlenko & A. Blackledge (Eds.), Negotiation of identities in multilingual contexts (pp. 219-242). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
14.
Koester, J. ( 1985). A profile of the U.S. student abroad. New York: Council on International Educational Exchange .
15.
Lantolf, J.P., & Appel, G. ( 1994). Theoretical framework: An introduction to Vygotskian approaches to second language research. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 1-28). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
16.
Lantolf, J.P., & Pavlenko, A. ( 2001). (S)econd (L)anguage (A)ctivity theory: Understanding second language learners as people. In M. Breen (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 141-158). London: Longman.
17.
Lantolf, J.P., & Thorne, S.L. ( 2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Lompscher, J. ( 1999). Motivation and activity. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 11-22.
20.
Markova, A.K. ( 1990). Ways of investigating motivation for learning in school children. Soviet Psychology, 28 (6), 21-42.
21.
McMurtrie, B. ( 2007, November 16). Study-abroad numbers continue to climb, trips are shorter, report says. Chronicle of Higher Education , p. A36. Retrieved November 14, 2008, from http://chronicle.com/weekly/v54/i12/12a03601.htm
22.
Vande Berg, M. ( 2007). Intervening in the learning of U.S. students abroad. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11, 392-399.
23.
Vygotsky, L.S. ( 1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
Wilkinson, S. ( 1998). Study abroad from the participants’ perspectives: A challenge to common beliefs. Foreign Language Annals, 31, 23-39.
