Phenomenology and Meaning Making: Student Voices and Understandings of Cultural Difference

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine international school secondary students’ understandings of intercultural sensitivity and the life experiences they attribute as influencing their own development of intercultural sensitivity, including participation in four models of service programs offered at their school. With practitioners in the field of service-learning claiming that service-learning influences students’ personal development, this study uses semistructured interviews and qualitative analysis to gain insights from students’ perspectives about the influence of participation in service-learning programs and other life factors on their intercultural sensitivity. This study found that international school students have many formal and informal opportunities to experience difference; that although service-learning can influence the development of intercultural sensitivity, it does not necessarily do so; and that students are able to develop intercultural sensitivity through a variety of life experiences.

Keywords

intercultural sensitivity international education service-learning international schools Milton Bennett Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allport, G. W. (1979). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.

American School Foundation, Mexico City . (2004). ASF mission. Retrieved from http://www.asf.edu

Bennett, M. J. (1993). Toward a developmental model of intercultural sensitivity. In R. M. Paige (Ed.), Education for the intercultural experience (pp. 21-71). Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.

Billig, S. H. (2000). Research on K-12 school-based service-learning: The evidence builds. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(9), 676-677.

Conrad, D. , & Hedin, D. (1991). School-based community service: What we know from research and theory. Phi Delta Kappan, 72(10), 754-757.

Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Denzin, M. K. , & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998). Strategies of qualitative inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Dunlap, M. R. (1998). Voices of students in multicultural service-learning settings. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 5, 58-67.

Eyler, J. , & Giles, D. (1999). Where’s the learning in service-learning? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

10.

Friedman, T. L. (2000). The Lexus and the olive tree. New York: Random House.

11.

Hammer, M. R. , & Bennett, M. J. (1998). The Intercultural Development Inventory (IDI) manual. Portland, OR: Intercultural Communication Institute.

12.

Hammer, M. R. , & Bennett, M. J. (2001). The IDI qualifying seminar. Portland, OR: Intercultural Communication Institute.

13.

Hayden, M. , & Thompson, J. (1998). International education: Principles and practices. London: Kogan Page.

14.

Heyward, M. (2000). Intercultural literacy and the international school. International Schools Journal, 19(2), 29-36.

15.

Hong Kong International School . (2004). About HKIS. Retrieved from http:%5Cwww.dragonnet.hkis.edu.hk

16.

Intercultural Communication Institute . (2004). The Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity. Retrieved from http://www.intercultural.org

17.

International School of Brussels . (2004). Mission statement. Retrieved from http://www.isb.be

18.

International School of Kenya . (2004). School philosophy. Retrieved from http://www.isk.ac.ke

19.

International School of Kuala Lumpur . (2004). Strategic plan. Retrieved from http://www.iskl.edu.my

20.

Kellogg, W. A. (1999). Toward more transformative service-learning: Experiences from an urban environmental problem-solving class. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 6, 63-73.

21.

LeCompte, M. D. (2000). Analyzing qualitative data. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 146-154.

22.

Nathan, J. , & Kielsmeier, J. (1991). The sleeping giant of school reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 72(10), 738-742.

23.

National Society for Experiential Education. (1998). http://www.nsee.org/defh.htm%23service-learning.

24.

Paige, R. M. (1983). Cultures in contact: On intercultural relations among American and foreign students in the United States university context. In D. Landis & R. W. Brislin (Eds.), Handbook of intercultural training: Vol. III. Area studies in intercultural training (pp. 102-129). New York: Pergamon.

25.

Paige, R. M. , Jacobs-Cassuto, M. , Yershova, Y. A. , & DeJaeghere, J. (1999, April). Assessing intercultural sensitivity: A validation study of the Hammer and Bennett Paper. Presented at the International Academy of Intercultural Research conference, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio.

26.

Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

27.

Rubin, H. J. , & Rubin, I. S. (1995). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

28.

Shumer, R. , & Cook, C. (1999). The status of service learning in the United States. Minneapolis, MN: National Service Learning Clearinghouse.

29.

Westrick, J. M. (in press). The influence of service-learning on intercultural sensitivity: A quantitative study. Journal of Research in International Education.