This qualitative study examines how four academic departments responded to the presence of large numbers of graduate international students. Results focus on faculty members’ responses to international students as advisors, instructors, and supervisors; departmental policies established to address their presence; and the unresolved issues that often remained for faculty. The study also examines the role that international students played in shaping departments’ responses to them.
Altbach, P. G. (1986). The foreign student dilemma. Teachers College Record, 87, 589-609.
2.
Barber, E. G., & Morgan, R. P. (1984). Engineering education and the international student: Policy issues. Engineering Education, 74, 655-659.
3.
Barber, E. G., & Morgan, R. P. (1988). Boon or bane: Foreign graduate students in U.S. engineering programs (IIE Research Report Series No. 15). New York: Institute of International Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 295 542)
4.
Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 195-203.
5.
Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
Davis, T. M. (Ed.). (2002). Open doors 2001/2002: Report on international educational exchange. New York: Institute of International Education.
7.
Deressa, B., & Beavers, I. (1988). Needs assessment of international students in a college of home economics. Educational Research Quarterly, 12, 51-56.
8.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550.
9.
Fallon, G., & Brown, R. B. (1999). What about the workers? Academic staff opinion about working with non-UK postgraduate students in higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 23, 41-52.
10.
Fasheh, M. (1984). Foreign students in the United States: An enriching experience or a wasteful one?Contemporary Educational Psychology, 9, 313-320.
11.
Fisher, M. (1985). Rethinking the ‘foreign TA problem’. In J. D. W. Andrews (Ed.), Strengthening the teaching assistant faculty (pp. 63-73) (New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 22). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12.
Fletcher, J. F. & Stren, R. E. (1989). Language skills and adaptation: A study of foreign students in a Canadian university. Curriculum Inquiry, 19, 293-308.
13.
Goodwin, C. D., & Nacht, M. (1983). Absence of decision: Foreign students in American colleges and universities. New York: Institute of International Education.
14.
Goodwin, C. D., & Nacht, M. (1986). Decline and renewal: Causes and cures of decay among foreign-trained intellectuals and professionals in the third world (IIE Report No. 9). New York: Institute of International Education.
15.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
16.
Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. Berkshire, UK: McGraw-Hill.
17.
Jacobs, L. C., & Friedman, C. B. (1988). Student achievement under foreign teaching associates compared with native teaching associates. Journal of Higher Education, 5, 551-563.
18.
Johnson, I. A. (1992). Different perspectives—Different purposes: Some issues relating to the education of overseas students. Education for Information, 10, 269-277.
19.
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 965-990.
20.
Kaplan, R. B. (1987). Foreign students: Developing institutional policy. The College Board Review, No. 143, 7-9, 28-30.
21.
Lee, M., Abd-Ella, M., & Burks, L. (1981). Needs of foreign students from developing nations at U.S. colleges and universities. Washington, DC: National Association for Foreign Student Affairs.
22.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
23.
Lulat, Y. G.-M., & Altbach, P. G. (1985). International students in comparative perspective: Toward a political economy of international study. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education handbook of theory and research (Vol. 1, pp. 439-495). New York: Agathon Press.
24.
Mestenhauser, J. A. (1998). International education on the verge: In search of a new paradigm. International Educator, 7, 2-3. Retrieved from http://www.nafsa.org/publicatons/ie/spring98/verge.html
25.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
O’Malley, M., & Bowman, J. (2001, June). Language in Quebec. Retrieved from http://www.cbc.ca/news/indepth/language/
27.
Perrucci, R., & Hu, H. (1995). Satisfaction with social and educational experiences among international graduate students. Research in Higher Education, 36(4), 491-508.
28.
Rubin, D. L. (1992). Nonlanguage factors affecting undergraduates’ judgments of nonnative English-speaking teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education, 33, 511-531.
29.
Seeger, J. S. (1993). Contrasting views of U.S. graduate education: Indonesian students and their American mentors. (Doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, 1994). Dissertation Abstracts International, 54/07, 2487A.
30.
Trice, A. G., & Yoo, J. E. (2003). An examination of the relationship between graduate international students’ academic satisfaction and post-graduation work plans. Manuscript submitted for publication.
31.
Urch, G. E. (1992). Global education: The time is now. Educational Horizons, 71(1), 15-17.
32.
Weiler, H. N. (1984). The political dilemmas of foreign study. Comparative Education Review, 28(4), 168-179.
33.
Wierzbicka, A. (1997). Understanding cultures through their key words: English, Russian, Polish, German, and Japanese. New York: Oxford University.
